Bernie would be in the best position to nuke him from orbit on stage. He could easily paint picking Abrams as establishment already looking past having to be nominated, and Abrams as a token pick compared with the diverse staff of women he's hired.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
2020 Democratic Presidential Primary | OT | Hickenlooper makes it to the debate
- Thread starter pigeon
- Start date
- Status
Bernie would be in the best position to nuke him from orbit on stage. He could easily paint picking Abrams as establishment already looking past having to be nominated, and Abrams as a token pick compared with the diverse staff of women he's hired.
Calling Beto Robert can get you banned on the DailyKOS comments section, haha
Not sure on those allegations, but he also states he's a friend of Sirota's, so forgive me if I don't unilaterally believe his word on the subject. I think we'll just have to wait until the smoke clears up on this.
Hes probably got the donations lined up just because lying about it and then having your lie publicized a few weeks later is incredibly stupid. But then again maybe Yangs like a gambling addict and is absolutely SURE he will have the donors before filing time so whats the harm in saying hes got them now?
This is actually false it seems, he deleted the tweet
https://twitter.com/ResistScaryBear/status/1108771942788722688
Well, then.
I really need to stick to my policy of not using unsourced tweets from randos as a source more often.
You can do it yourself, unless maybe the tweet got deleted because it was already fixed
No, what they're saying is that the number reported is true, but there's a glitch that changes the number based on date/time. Not that it doesn't change when you change your date/time, but that the fact that it does is a glitch but the numbers themselves are real.
Yea its just a busted website, would be funny if his numbers were fake but like I said earlier it would be incredibly stupid to fake those numbers since theyre compelled by law to release them every quarter. Just a funny thing to laugh at to Take my attention off Stacey Abrahms (please be smart enough to turn Bidens offer down!!!!)
Maybe. I think the establishment angle can work to Sanders' benefit. I think it it can work too because it's an actual, real danger for Biden in doing this. It feels like Biden is trying to choke the field, trying to suppress the primary. I think it will antagonize many people, particularly in the Sanders wing.
And anyway, Harris probably would be well positioned, too. She's a black woman , and has tacked left mostly in the primary. Despite some of her record, I think she could be uniquely positioned to attack Biden on his record with black women and black people in general more broadly.
Warren already showed she is willing to go there to some level when she said virulent homophobe Mike Pence is not a decent person, disagreeing with Joe Biden.
I think it would be good if people brought the claws out.
I think Warren led the pack on this.
Glad to see Harris not going though.
Well the journalist of the article isn't really helping the credibility of his side either with shit like this:
Agreed on everything you said.
I'd also like to point out that if Abrams were smart, she would say no to this. She is going to be completely dragged by the left in an ugly primary fight, and the right because...well, they're the right.
This is not going to be some smooth coronation. Nobody is going down without a fight.
Oh wow, yeah I didn't know that. Just posted the tweet because it was relevant.
That's not the issue though. The man made an article about the lack of transparency of another journalist and posts a tweet with the date cropped out, only to 'correct' the date with an incorrect date. The journalism is just straight up sloppy.
When the article is predicated on a presumed timeline, one would hope that getting the dates right would be something the author is competent at.
EDIT: And how the hell did he mistake CHRISTMAS DAY for the 27th anyway?
Last edited:
Howard fucking Schultz isn't going? Jesus, they really fucked up, huh. Completely destroyed their brand
Bernie didn't go in 2016, no reason to expect he would've done so this time around when the tide has definitely started turning.
Wow Omar sticking her neck out really had a domino effect. Good on Warren for being the first hopeful to make the call
For what it's worth, I've never even noticed any of the text after 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary. The rest is entirely fluff that I ignore when I click the thread.
Meanwhile...
She's definitely a progressive, though.
Pete is my favorite candidate so far in the early running. When does the first debate happen?
Three months from now in June. this is going to be a very long primary season.
Abrams is a great VP candidate. But it's unfair and shitty for Biden to pick her before getting the nom. So he gets a second person to help compensate for his weaknesses, but none of the other candidates do at this point?
Perhaps posted, but I think Hickenlooper just took himself out of the race.
John Hickenlooper asks why female candidates aren't pressed about naming a male running mate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ng-mate/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6af1b9f27334
John Hickenlooper asks why female candidates aren't pressed about naming a male running mate
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ng-mate/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.6af1b9f27334
They're learning
Damn, when Howard Schultz is on the right side of things compared to you....
Most likely the other candidates who get the nomination would pick the second runner up or someone else who came close as their VP nominee. Can't really announce them as your VP at this point
- Status