I think some people might have assumed since the Series S is more powerful than an X1X, it'll run and display games equal to or better than the X1X. It's targeting 1440p for next-gen games but older XB1 games that run at 4K on the X1X could do the same on the Series S given its hardware, but I imagine the RAM is probably the likely culprit there.
It's...concerning.
*slow clap* What's more, why would Microsoft design it that way? If you are buying Series S you don't seem to mind your next gen games run at 1440p, but it's a deal breaker that your BC Xbox games don't run at 4K? What? I mean sure, it's nice to have, but you benefited by saving yourself $200. What sort of logic is this?
Well yeah, but Jaguar bottlenecked everything across the board. That's not going to be a problem at least for a small subset of games this time.
The question I have is will it play Xbox 360 games at One S level as well i.e. basically Xbox 360 settings? or can it push higher resolution for it?
I mean it's no where near that catastrophic. Most of the market doesn't own a One X so this effects them in like..
this is so weird lol the only thing a One X does differently for BC is 4k but you already knew the Series S wasnt a 4K console... so what did you expect??
I'm talking more about XBOX, 360 and Early-mid gen titles, of course that demanding games shouldn't be possible, but one could expect to run RDR1 at 4K the same way as in the ONEX, I still think it's possible, but they didn't made it clear.
A system that plays all third parties and probably all upcoming games and any MS game for $299.
