Are YOU Sony? Do you own substantial shares in Sony? Why does this trouble you this much?
Maybe there are a lot of Sony employees here. Would explain a lot lol
Are YOU Sony? Do you own substantial shares in Sony? Why does this trouble you this much?
People asked for a decent library/VC service for Switch since it was announced.Nintendos been doing this shit for two or three years. Sony decides to jump aboard and suddenly BC is brought up and everyone seems to hate the idea.
..huh?
So who is willing to bet that MS next year will do Xbox classic console ??
I honestly don't understand the PS1 classic @ $100. If there's no enhancements to the games why not just go out and get a PS1 and a bunch of games you want for chump change.
Market leader vs competitor playing catch-up. It's always the "what have you done for me lately?" scenario with gamers. The sentiment plainly ignores the reality of the hole that Microsoft dug for itself in the beginning of this generation. You know, when they "got greedy" coming off of the 360 and pulled a massive digital only overreach and Sony's PS4 was the "gamer's console" and the golden child for the gaming community. Competition is the best source of innovation and Microsoft being humbled led to their current gamer-centric focus and the BC initiative that folks love. No more TV TV TV TV.Right, but not the PS4. My Xbox 360 can play Xbox Games at no additional cost also. But current-gen should be what people are focusing on. Nintendo and Sony want to make a quick buck on nostalgia. Microsoft does also, at the cost of their newest consoles, but in a better way whether that be X enhancements, Game Pass, Games with Gold, or you simply owning the game. Microsoft's deal is the better deal in all honesty especially if your backlog is on disc or digital. You don't have to have a subscription or buy a separate console, but you can if you'd like.
But even still, if I bought an Xbox One or a PS4 I should be able to indulge in the previous gen games at no extra cost. Sony's been acting fairly greedy these days, but I couldn't pass on their games this gen.
Because many of us have already bought these old games, in some cases multiple times.
XBox is 100% right. Having to buy a novelty hunk of plastic to play old games when they could simply be part of Switch and PS4 really sucks and is really money-grubby.
Just wait and watch .they will announce it .they won't pass up on the money and this is a good way to get some funds from core fans . A small oroginal Xbox with 20 games .if they can sort out the lincensing issues that isMicrosoft has a console for people who want to play classic games...its called Xbox One.
I am, they won't.So who is willing to bet that MS next year will do Xbox classic console ??
There are people who are arguing that the original tweet was clear, instead of just accepting that the tweet was kind of sloppy written, yes.
Microsoft has a console for people who want to play classic games...its called Xbox One.
So who is willing to bet that MS next year will do Xbox classic console ??
PSX video output is limited to S-Video unless you want to invest in something like the Framemeister or OSSC and use a SCART connection to provide RGB. A better option would be a PS2 which has component video support and gets you mostly there. How many TV's have component video anymore though? So the PS Classic gives you the games in question, a quick and easy method of connecting them to modern TV's and you do get a significant improvement in clarity if your only experience was playing PSX games back in the day on a CRT.I honestly don't understand the PS1 classic @ $100. If there's no enhancements to the games why not just go out and get a PS1 and a bunch of games you want for chump change.
Some insecure people getting offended by this I see
BC is an abomination that must be squashed !
But were you actually confused at all by the tweet? Like did you actually think it meant what you're saying it was misleading you to think?
said no one everTrue, unless my preferred entertainment company is behind it, it must be bad.
Microsoft is not in a position to translate their past library and systems into a simple and high profit system like the classic consoles.
Why would they do this when BC is their main draw? Ninja Gaiden Black I bought nearly a decade ago digitally, I can play on X1 now. Every PS1 and PS2 I bought on PS3 I can't touch on PS4. Some of them they've put back on the store and want me to buy them again.Just wait and watch .they will announce it .they won't pass up on the money and this is a good way to get some funds from core fans . A small oroginal Xbox with 20 games .if they can sort out the lincensing issues that is
And why would they need to when such libraries exist on Xbox One, most seeing performance benefits, and some even with enhancements.
They're doing it and are able to do it because they dont have a valid solution for BC. It wouldn't make much sense at all for MS to release an Xbox classic.because there is an audience for simple, cheap and retro style classic systems. It isn't that complicated why Nintendo and Sony are doing this.
They're doing it and are able to do it because they dont have a valid solution for BC. It wouldn't make much sense at all for MS to release an Xbox classic.
Don't even make it a functional console, just release mini OG Xbox and 360 figurines for collectors. The Xbox One serves at the classic consoles.Release a 360bc shell with a few games.
Give it wifi and let it purchase from marketplace.
Lol, you keep hoping.You can tell this is an excellent burn cuz some of the fanboys are getting upset hahah!
Instead of backwards compatibility they're releasing a $100 stand alone console, that's stupid. Do both or just do bc on ps4.
Sony's leadership has really been making some questionable decisions lately. Anti consumer even.
Something tells me that the ps5 is going to be a train wreck shit show on the level of the Xbox one and Wii U. We'll see.
I would have it read it the same way as many people on Twitter if I didn't know how the BC feature on the Xbox works.
You can tell this is an excellent burn cuz some of the fanboys are getting upset hahah!
Instead of backwards compatibility they're releasing a $100 stand alone console, that's stupid. Do both or just do bc on ps4.
Sony's leadership has really been making some questionable decisions lately. Anti consumer even.
Something tells me that the ps5 is going to be a train wreck shit show on the level of the Xbox one and Wii U. We'll see.
Microsoft is not in a position to translate their past library and systems into a simple and high profit system like the classic consoles.
I honestly don't understand the PS1 classic @ $100. If there's no enhancements to the games why not just go out and get a PS1 and a bunch of games you want for chump change.
I would have it read it the same way as many people on Twitter if I didn't know how the BC feature on the Xbox works.
So an Xbox One, then?Release a 360bc shell with a few games.
Give it wifi and let it purchase from marketplace.
This doesn't make sense.
Well you need to pay for the console and for the games, It is not free.
Then what other purpose would there be behind your statement:
Because you're right, in a sense, that they're not in a position to do so, seeing as how they ALREADY have a competent BC program on their systems.
Unless you mean to say that Xbox couldn't get away with a collectible mini version of their original console, regardless BC. Which is bonkers, considering how much influence that console has had on modern systems.
The games themselves are not free, but the feature is offered at no additional cost to you.
Well you need to pay for the console and for the games, It is not free.