Lol, you want everyone on ERA to die? Might as well choose a Hammerhead in the ocean with no weapons, an Orca with nothing but a spear, or an Emperor Penguin.
If it were a leopard, then I'd go with wolf. Leopards have more dangerous claws and are strong enough to carry their prey up trees. A wolf isn't as bad as that.I was trying to think of three animals in the same weight class. And I actually thought a leopard was way heavyer than it turns out, or else I would have used that instead of the cheetah
Crocodile, easily. They very rarely attack anything in the water, preferring to attack at the water's edge. If you end up fighting them at the water's edge, the muscles that open their jaws are quite weak. They also have terrible endurance. If, and I admit that it's a big if, but if you could jump on their backs and hold on for like thirty seconds while they roll around, the fight would be over in your favor.If you win, you're instantly transported to a freshwater pond where you have to swim for 2 minutes with a crocodile, hippo, or anaconda.
Dr Forester I implore you to heed the words of your colleague Dr Mario:People who are picking the monkey are out of their minds.
I'd probably go for the Cheetah as it's the smaller than a wolf.
You know what, you're right. The only really dangerous thing about a wolf is its bites. You will lose a limb and possible bleed out, but while it's chewing off your arm, you still have your other hand free to claw its eyes out or get a hold of its windpipe. The cheetah meanwhile is raking open your stomach while you fend off its bite.
Well to be fair, you have a better chance of dealing with a bear than either of those animals. Black bear, just make noise and make yourself bigger. Grizzlies, just be in a fetal position or perhaps back away slowly or stand your ground. Polar bears meanwhile are entirely different story though.Anything but the chimp. I feel like apes and bears are the deadliest mammals other than the terrifying hippos.
You know what, you're right. The only really dangerous thing about a wolf is its bites. You will lose a limb and possible bleed out, but while it's chewing off your arm, you still have your other hand free to claw its eyes out or get a hold of its windpipe. The cheetah meanwhile is raking open your stomach while you fend off its bite.
A cat is nothing to trifle with, and keep in mind all three of these choices are equally weighted at 130lbs. 130lbs for a dog is pretty damn big, but 130lbs for a cat is gigantic.
You ever try to pick up a territorial housecat?This is what a cheetah's claws look like
They aren't gutting anyone.
House cat claws are significantly sharper because they retract and they naturally use them as a primary weapon. Neither of these things is true of cheetahs.
Oh… ok point taken.House cat claws are significantly sharper because they retract and they naturally use them as a primary weapon. Neither of these things is true of cheetahs.
For comparison, this what proper big cat claws, the kind that will gut you, look like:
Right, thanks, back to the cheetah it is.This is what a cheetah's claws look like
They aren't gutting anyone.
Cheetahs claws are not like other felines because those claws would suck at high speeds for turning. They got claws like dogs or.. wolves. The cheetah can literally only bite too but they're smaller than wolves and much less muscular, their rips look like they would break with a single punch lol. Cheetahs suck. They only get to eat a third of what they hunt because every other animal scares them away. An average adult cheetah weighs less than 60kg on the top end. Thats like your average 12 year old human male or something. And again that's the top end. The lower end is 35kg.. choosing wolf over cheetah is the objectively wrong answer, there is zero debate to be had.Figured the cheetah would be worse than the wolf because cats can claw with all four feet while a wolf can just bite. You might be able to clamp the wolf's jaws closed and survive.
Leopards are 60kg on the somewhat lower end. Cheetahs are 60kg on the high end and that's already stretching it, google say 54, leopards are like twice the size in practice. But look at that thing, it's so much muscle, on the other hand you can almost count the rips on a cheetah, they have very little muscle outside their legs, leopards and other big cats are built like trucks. That guy could take a beating. How many kicks or punches to the ribs could a cheetah take? Not many.Just curious. Those of you who picked the cheetah: Would you have voted different had it been a leopard? (still 60kg/130lbs)
Leopards are 60kg on the somewhat lower end. Cheetahs are 60kg on the high end and that's already stretching it, google say 54, leopards are like twice the size in practice. But look at that thing, it's so much muscle, on the other hand you can almost count the rips on a cheetah, they have very little muscle outside their legs, leopards and other big cats are built like trucks. That guy could take a beating. How many kicks or punches to the ribs could a cheetah take? Not many.
That's what i'm saying. Leopards are beasts compared to cheetahs.I've never fought a leopard, but I'm gonna go out on a limb and say if you're unarmed: a leopard that is determined to kill you is gonna kill you. I can't think if any situation I'd be confident in; even if you started the fight on it's back with a body triangle and choke sunk in, I don't think you have the strength to keep it from destroying you. In short bursts, cats are *insanely* strong animals.
You take that back!
Chimpanzee out of that list. The other two are very fast and have very sharp teeth and claws.
Feel like I could out maneuver a Chimpanzee.
Better odds with a cheetah or wolf.
Not the chimp. Stay far away from chimps!