But that's a thing that Microsoft is actively changing right now. It's not exactly like on PC but they are getting closer and to me that's a good thing. I also don't see why it should be different, the games are coming anyway, they are just not there at launch.
Yeah, it's not like I personally would have a problem with it. All I'm saying is that if we are solely talking about sales and adoption rates, new games are imo by far the most important factor. BCs importance, whether enhanced or not, is just way overestimated here and Game Pass is also available on current gen.
It is. However, I feel like priorities have changed. Gone are the days when you would need some hot launch title because you have a whole library of stunning looking games already really to play. On both the series x and ps5, I would love to play some older games with a frame rate and resolution boost.
I mean, it isn't that much more difficult to designate tasks to specific blocks. The intention is to save BOM while still providing incredibly fast GDDR6 for CPU crunching, a smart design consistent with the theses that Microsoft has with the Xbox Series. 338GB/s memory chunks is not a bad thing at a , and heck even 10GB at 560GB/s is nuts in comparison to XBX's 326GB/s memory. I trust the intentions behind Microsoft's specialist engineers in choosing the split memory modules.
I couldn't agree more..it's a big missed opportunity, and I had convinced myself it was going to happen cause it just made too much sense. My guess is it came down to not having a developer..or maybe MS just doesn't give a shit about the franchise.
While that's true, it's probably a little different with all of the crossgen gaas.
You could say that about the PS5 though with two of their bigger launch titles also coming to PS4. People shockingly buy consoles for all different reasons, "exclusives" is just one of them.
The selling point is exactly that though: sell your One X and move to the Series X while continuing on from where you left off with all titles accessible including saves/BC. It is the smartphone approach, of buy new thing for faster performance while still holding on to the previous content you had. It is why Apple is able to sell a new iPhone every year, because it isn't to entirely kill off the previous phone but dangle a shiny new carrot in front of the consumer that is effortless to upgrade.
History also shows that if you have some 3rd party heavy hitters on the beggining of the generation, people won't notice the rest. Indies too.
And that's perfectly fine. I personally stick to phones for as long as I can too, unless they break and its timed well within a new gen release. That was my point though, everyone has differing opinions on their needs for a console and its capabilities to consume content. Those assuming Microsoft has "lost" due to a lack of first-party, or those assuming they are perfectly fine due to titles still being available just not exclusive, are right because opinions are a wonderfully unique thought.
Exactly, it is simply up to the consumer as to what they feel is key to purchasing the product. If its first-party being prevalent then maybe they don't go Xbox, but they could also very much go for one and be just as happy.
What games do they have coming in 2021? I believe Forza and Halo, right? The rest of their games were cg trailers if i'm not mistaken.
Demon's Souls isn't new either. Neither is
Miles Morales is DLC. Said it when it was announced against statements on how it was not possible on PS4. It is DLC being sold on disc. I have seen larger content being sold cheaper.
yep, everything compelling on PS5 is also coming to PS4, I would not be surprised if God of war 2 comes to PS4 as well
Maybe the hair is just TOO realistic now and it would make us question reality.
