I'm surprised it was only 300k. That seems low for a billionaire like Bloomberg.
The issue with this argument is that Bloomberg is polling like 4th nationally and Gravel was struggling to hit 1%. he does have a more support than Gravel ever did in that regard.
Trump and Republicans aren't even being accused of "buying" elections.
DNC Staffer said:We wanted everyone to get as many chances as we could and I think it's a very generous set of rules. But I think the broader issue is that we can't change them later on for the benefit of any candidate. Uh, you know that's just, kind of our rule number 1 for us here and it doesn't matter who it is. We didn't change them for senator- for governor Bullock and we can't change them for anybody. That is contrary to what people expect out of the DNC and what we have committed to in terms of running a transparent and a neutral primary.
People like booker likely wouldnt have dropped out had they applied this rule when he was still in. Instead they only did so to accomodate the billionaire giving them money.Anyone polling as high as Bloomberg should be allowed to debate and be debated. The donation seems irrelevant to me.
Nah, but if he had joined the race a few months earlier he probably would have been a formidable contender.
I hope you're rightNah, but if he had joined the race a few months earlier he probably would have been a formidable contender.
The Gravel Institute âś”
@GravelInstitute
In July 2019, the Mike Gravel campaign contacted the DNC after receiving over 65,000 unique donors.
On the call, a senior official swore that they would never change the debate rules for any candidate. Six months later, they did exactly that.
Listen to them lie to our faces:
The people defending this...just admit that there should be no rules for rich elites who can buy the process and be done with it. Stop tip toeing around it by calling people conspiracy theorists when this literally something that is indisputable.
"Wow the DCCC locking out progressive candidates and being called out by the squad? WHat conspiracy nutjobs those young women of color are"
I don't care for Bloomberg's candidacy and the rule was well-intended but it makes less than zero sense to punish Bloomberg for funding his own campaign. Instead of throwing out allegations on why they did it, do you actually have any argument on why they shouldn't have?"The DNC arbitrarily getting rid of their own debate requirements because of favorable donations from rich assholes? Take off the tinfoil hats!"
"The DNC stacking their organization with people to literally reverse the rules just made up from the so called "unity commission" right as an election comes up? Lol yeah sure, like i'd believe that factual thing that happend."
DNC members discuss rules change to stop Sanders at convention
The talks reveal rising anxiety over the Vermont senator's momentum on the eve of voting.www.politico.com
Wake up for all our sakes.
Russian bots getting their work made for free
I mean the dude's spending hundreds of millions of ads everywhere which is boosting him to 3rd/4th in national polls because low info people recongnize his name only from the ads (I think I hear 5ish ads a day here in Central PA just from the local radio stations). This donation is a pittance compared to what he's paying to get name recongition with low info voters. At least get him on the debate stage so people can see how shitty of a person he is. Maybe that can finally get him to start dropping in polls (at least I hope) and maybe just stop with all of the fucking ads everywhere..