Dan Thunder

Member
Nov 2, 2017
15,045
I imagine it's probably going to be a $20-30m salary for RDJ and a bigger backend percentage. I mean he got something like $75m from both IW and Endgame alone so I'd expect him to walk away with at least $100m per movie. I guess in some ways a lot of that could be offset by paying whoever ends up as the New Avengers a lot less money. I mean by the end of the IW saga I imagine that pretty much all the actors were on a hefty wedge so as there will likely be new members of the team in these films they won't get paid anywhere near as much as the original team did by the time Endgame rolled around.

Crazy that since Endgame he's only been in two theatrical releases (Dolittle & Oppenheimer) and he only starred in one of them.
 

beat

Member
Oct 28, 2017
3,316
For that much money I hope Marvel got two main Avengers movies and at least a cameo in FF outta RDJ.
 

Principate

Member
Oct 31, 2017
11,325
The usual reminder: they were always going to pay RDJ an obscene amount of money to return for their big multiversity Avengers film, whether the Kang stuff worked out or not.
Yeah but it would be significantly less as a cameo in one film versus being prime billing for both films. If Disney weren't so desperate they absolutely would not be doing this.
 
Oct 29, 2017
4,294
A quick google seems to estimate he got about 75m each for Infinity War and Endgame once receipts were counted? Sounds about right, if thats true. Not sure why people think he'd come back for less than the last two films. Regardless of who he plays.

And 80m for two directors who delivered you two films that made over 2bn dollars, one that made over a billion and one that made 700m.

Seems very desperate and sad and desperate tbh.

please dont actually be upset, anyone, i'm just mucking about.
 

Plinkerton

Member
Nov 4, 2017
6,404
This is a real hail mary to try and bring back the excitement to MCU. I think it will pay off but if this fails its more or less over for the MCU.

My guess is that it'll work for these two films and they'll make bank, but it won't impact the long-term performance/perception of MCU films overall. People will be excited to see RDJ back in Marvel films but that won't translate to them showing up for the "B tier" films that come out around those two.
 

Dust

C H A O S
Member
Oct 25, 2017
35,941
RDJ as Doom will get butts in the cinema, 100%. That part is settled. I do wonder about the hero side, how that is going to work for mass audience.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
22,504
would be hilarious if the movie doesn't do big numbers at the box office and they all just look at each other and go, "now what?" This has to be the last resort. Or Thanos returning is.

Also gonna be interesting to see how much this moves the marvel fatigue needle the other way. Infinity Saga had build up. This is just Kang being rewritten out and tossing in Doom. If people didn't know who Thanos was at the end of Avengers (2012), they don't know who Doom is.
 

SoneaB

Member
Oct 18, 2020
1,389
UK
I have nothing against Mr Downey nor am I against actors playing multiple rolls across a series but there are so many people who could play an amazing Doom without having to pay that sort of money. It's irresponsible accounting. Hopefully they know what they are doing.
 

thewienke

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,033
Considering all the people that will be in these movies plus CG…

$500 million each? Probably need $1.5 billion as a minimum for each if we use the 3x multiplier. Basically two of the original Avengers box office. That's very very doable with 2024 prices.
 

Kinthey

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
23,400
Could probably finance an entire regular MCU movie with the salary for three people. This is insane
 

Bard

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
13,236
All that for a terrible casting choice and the continuous erasure of Roma characters. Good job Marvel.
 

Gavalanche

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 21, 2021
20,797
Do people want RDJ as evil? Flawed yes, it what makes Ironman great. But would they be cool seeing RDJ committing murder and shit?
 

Min

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,209
Can't believe we're going to have the next Endgame but with a set up of multiple dead end cliffhangers, no team, no sequel character building, and a fake out villain swap last minute.
 

Alexandros

Member
Oct 26, 2017
18,485
My guess is that it'll work for these two films and they'll make bank, but it won't impact the long-term performance/perception of MCU films overall. People will be excited to see RDJ back in Marvel films but that won't translate to them showing up for the "B tier" films that come out around those two.

The X-Men aren't B tier, so if Marvel can successfully weather its rough phase then it will be much better positioned for the future.
 

Gavalanche

Prophet of Regret
Member
Oct 21, 2021
20,797
I mean, he played Strauss in Oppenheimer and people loved it so I'll say... Yes?

Strauss wasn't really evil though. He was just a political hound with a chip on his shoulder and a healthy case of narcissism. Dr Doom is a mass murdering genocidal dictator, this a little different :p

But maybe you are right.
 

Uzzy

Gabe’s little helper
Member
Oct 25, 2017
30,503
Hull, UK
Could probably finance an entire regular MCU movie with the salary for three people. This is insane

According to Wiki re the Marvels: 'The film was a box-office bomb, grossing $206 million worldwide against a gross production budget of $274.8 million, making it the lowest-grossing film in the MCU and one of the few MCU films not to break even in its theatrical run.'

If RDJ's 'significantly more' is any more than 50% up on what the Russo brothers are getting, then they're paying three men more than the entire box office of The Marvels.
 

Quinton

Staff Writer at TheGamer / Reviewer at RPG Site
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
18,802
Midgar, With Love
Can't believe we're going to have the next Endgame but with a set up of multiple dead end cliffhangers, no team, no sequel character building, and a fake out villain swap last minute.

As someone who checked out of the MCU years ago, save for Loki, could you let me know what all the dead end cliffhangers are? Spoiler tag them, maybe. But I'm curious because that's wild. One thing Phases 1 through 3 had in spades was the general ability to deliver on stuff that had been set up in prior films.
 

duckroll

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,438
Singapore
Strauss wasn't really evil though. He was just a political hound with a chip on his shoulder and a healthy case of narcissism. Dr Doom is a mass murdering genocidal dictator, this a little different :p

But maybe you are right.
Doom isn't really evil though. He is just a brilliant but unhinged dictator with a chip on his shoulder and a healthy case of narcissism. Let's not talk about mass murder and genocide when there are children around, gotta keep this PG-13!

🤣🤣
 

Mabase

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,132
Unless there's some Dr Doom = bad Tony Stark but with an ultimate redemption, I don't see how this is what any MCU fan wanted.

That's probably what they're aiming for. The last movie will end with a redeemed 'Evil Tony Stark', saying " I love you 3000!" and/or "I AM IRON MAN".

Cue the handkerchiefs and the dollar bills.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
22,504
80 million for the fucking Russo brothers. 😂 We have reached peak stupidity.
The Russo Bros may not be competent at their craft but they are capable yes men. That's what Marvel wants right now. They cannot afford to keep giving directors a bit more say in how things are done.

All that money and yet Simu Liu still hasn't been given a Shang-Chi 2.
Don't worry, you will get an entire film of side characters whose names you cannot recall.
 

kowhite

Member
May 14, 2019
5,891
I mean…RDJ isn't making significantly more than 80m for these two movies upfront. That's wrong. I asked someone who knows.
 

duckroll

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
12,438
Singapore
The Russo Bros may not be competent at their craft but they are capable yes men. That's what Marvel wants right now. They cannot afford to keep giving directors a bit more say in how things are done.
I don't even think that's remotely the case. If they just wanted yes men there are a dime a dozen everywhere. They have a bunch of them working on films right now. They don't cost 80 million. Some don't even cost 1 million.

What Marvel gets for 80 million is the public perception of safe stable marketing that allows them to say FROM THE DIRECTORS OF ENDGAME to hopefully distract the dumb mainstream from seeing that they don't have any plan or hope for the next 3 years of MCU movies.
 

entut1

Member
Mar 31, 2023
739
There is something most people don't seem to get here. Those are the salaries of two movies combined.
 

subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
22,504
I don't even think that's remotely the case. If they just wanted yes men there are a dime a dozen everywhere. They have a bunch of them working on films right now. They don't cost 80 million. Some don't even cost 1 million.

What Marvel gets for 80 million is the public perception of safe stable marketing that allows them to say FROM THE DIRECTORS OF ENDGAME to hopefully distract the dumb mainstream from seeing that they don't have any plan or hope for the next 3 years of MCU movies.
Eh, they don't have yes men who know the Marvel machine. There's probably a good reason why the Russo Bros stayed so long and it wasn't because they dreamed of creative freedom.

And the creators of Infinity War and Endgame don't carry as much weight anymore since their string of crap they made since Endgame.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,303
I am not surprised, but i also think that when you reach a certain amount it gets ridiculous. Everyone working on this should share in the success of these movies. Most of the money should go to the people doing the vfx here.
 

kowhite

Member
May 14, 2019
5,891
Eh, they don't have yes men who know the Marvel machine. There's probably a good reason why the Russo Bros stayed so long and it wasn't because they dreamed of creative freedom.

And the creators of Infinity War and Endgame don't carry as much weight anymore since their string of crap they made since Endgame.

Eh the 80m is probably wrong.
 

AndyVirus

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
3,031
The movies are guaranteed a billion each, but if you're paying this kind of money to 3 people alone, a billion won't be enough and it'll be need to be on par with the first two Avengers movies. Possible sure, but wouldn't say probable atm.
 

Strings

Member
Oct 27, 2017
32,782
Is that 80 million total for the director team for both movies, or 80 million for the director team for both movies, or 80 million per director for both movies, or 80 million per director for each movie? Makes a huge difference in the math!
It's for the two of them. No one will establish a precedent for paying a directing or writing pair more than if they were just an individual.