Really disappointed that these three VR-Flagship games valve announced 3 years ago turned out to be VR games
Who could have seen that coming
Who could have seen that coming
Is this what Rare fans felt when they made nothing but kinect games?
Does free movement VR work without making people sick? Left 4 Dead where you move from set point to set point by teleporting sounds odd. I know HL:A has the option. But wasn't sure if it would work for everyone.
I take it this is sarcasm with the 3rd person comment.Cant Valve make real games* please ?
*3rd person action/adventure story driven linear AAA titles.
I think it's sarcasm.So any game that you're not interested in isn't a real game? Pretty bizarre reasoning. Is there a console you don't own? Is that a fake console now?
Is Valve determined to alienate the majority of their player-base across PC and console through the continuation of VR only for their fan favourite franchises?
Seems so.
So any game that you're not interested in isn't a real game? Pretty bizarre reasoning. Is there a console you don't own? Is that a fake console now?
*Not VRCant Valve make real games* please ?
*3rd person action/adventure story driven linear AAA titles.
It really felt shitty to return to flat games after I got my VR set. Why am I looking at this world in a computer screen instead of actually being there surrounded by it, touching it?
Pretty much the story of the game industry in general. Every major advancement has been forced on gamers, and thank god it was, because otherwise the luddites of the gaming world would have us all playing ATARi games in 2019.
Damm right it's hard to tell these days.Sorry, it was sarcasm. I know, it's pretty hard to tell nowadays since some people actually think that going by this thread. :")
Valve really pushing VR with big IP. Although I will probably never try VR, give me the option without VR Valve.
Who is "we" exactly? Because I'm more than happy to get more VR focused games, you don't speak for me
It's exactly what I was looking for. Every FPS franchise should evolve into VR :-)
Sounds good to me. There's also the fact that L4D3's development included VR support, so maybe asymmetrical gameplay?
I really want a non-VR Left 4 Dead game. This is such a shame.
he wasnt sure if the plan for 3 VR games was still a thing and at the time was only 100% HL was happening in VR only but yeah L4D was pretty clear to be the next game.I thought L4D has been a known thing. Was watching VNN's videos a couple of weeks ago, where Tyler talks about how the canceled / on-hold L4D3 (tentative title) would have some VR functionality for one or two of the characters.
Is this what Rare fans felt when they made nothing but kinect games?
True. I guess what threw me off with his tweet was where he said it's "real", since I thought that was already established. I guess what he meant was more along the lines of "It's still happening"?he wasnt sure if the plan for 3 VR games was still a thing and at the time was only 100% HL was happening in VR only but yeah L4D was pretty clear to be the next game.
VR is the NeoGeo of our time xDKinect was awful and high-end PCVR is beyond incredible. This is more like when an amazing company makes games for an expensive console you can't have or don't want to have for some reason.
Plenty of piss poor "advancements" have been attempted to be push on gamers and thankfully failed.Pretty much the story of the game industry in general. Every major advancement has been forced on gamers, and thank god it was, because otherwise the luddites of the gaming world would have us all playing ATARi games in 2019.
yeah like its still happening/is a full VR game. We will learn more when he posts a video about it im sureTrue. I guess what threw me off with his tweet was where he said it's "real", since I thought that was already established. I guess what he meant was more along the lines of "It's still happening"?
Yes, and it's a good thing VR isn't a piss poor advancement, by a very large consensus of people that have actually used it. All despite it being very early technology that can only get better with each iteration.Plenty of piss poor "advancements" have been attempted to be push on gamers and thankfully failed.
a more accurate comparison would be if lets say Bethesda came out and released a Bethesda VR headset, told people they are working on flagship vr games and make it clear development is moving to a Elder Scrolls VR game and then they announce Elder Scrolls: Morrowind for all VR platforms.If for example Bungie or CDProject came out and announced the sequels to Destiny & The Witcher were VR only, some of you in this thread can't understand why people would be pissed/annoyed?
Not at all the same because Valve have been researching VR for almost a decade and announced 3 VR games almost 3 years ago. They have an actual responsibility to be making VR games for the foreseeable future.If for example Bungie or CDProject came out and announced the sequels to Destiny & The Witcher were VR only, some of you in this thread can't understand why people would be pissed/annoyed?
If for example Bungie or CDProject came out and announced the sequels to Destiny & The Witcher were VR only, some of you in this thread can't understand why people would be pissed/annoyed?
Plenty of piss poor "advancements" have been attempted to be push on gamers and thankfully failed.
Couldn't say it better. It is the exact opposite of the Kinect situation.No, because actual VR is far more ambitious in term of gameplay than anything being made today in "classic games".