Well the music didn't clear anything up
But Fox News did not disclose that the female audience it selected for the event was packed with local Republican supporters and the network edited its broadcast to remove some of their vocal advocacy of Trump.
People are weird. What else can I say?
I just got home from work and saw there was an event I was missing so I quickly ran to youtube and clicked a random streami found your problem; you're watching this chucklefuck's stream for some reason
i found your problem; you're watching this chucklefuck's stream for some reason
I just got home from work and saw there was an event I was missing so I quickly ran to youtube and clicked a random stream
Yea, A.I. can never capture her face for some reason. It always just looks like some generic dark skinned woman.I don't understand why AI makes her look like Tulsi Gabbard. All I see is Tulsi in jail.
They're gonna keep him off interviews and only speeches and rallies, aren't they? The last few have been absolute disasters.. The swaying concert, the Bloomberg one, and now this Univision..
MeidasTouch has been able to identify two of these four constituents, Angelina Banks and Yanni Lambros, as being former MAGA Republican political candidates. In other words, Trump's campaign had MAGA Republican operatives posing as regular voters asking questions as his Pennsylvania town hall event, a move that mitigates his risk of holding a town hall, and reveals the entire event to be a sham.
100%. If he were a normal candidate his team would be begging him to do one. I wouldn't be surprised if we see him less and less in the next few weeks - however in that situation they'd risk Harris hogging all the spotlight and coverage. I'm sure they're racking their brains on how to curate his public appearances to best minimize damage and maximize headlines.This is normally the point a candidate as pressured as he is would attempt to get another debate. But he's deteriorating so quickly his team won't let him. So instead he goes unhinged anywhere else and looks weaker than ever
I think this might be viewed as worse. These were questions from voters, not journalists.Seems like this Univision townhall was his worst media appearance since the NABJ fiasco. But this time coming in the middle of October.
AI generated shit is frequently a reflection of the white supremacist structures it was created under. Techbro engineers and whatever prompts people put in leads to this kind of shit.Yea, A.I. can never capture her face for some reason. It always just looks like some generic dark skinned woman.
Yea, they're caught between a rock and a hard place. Every time he opens his mouth is a disaster for the campaign, but if you hide him it just lets Kamala hog the spotlight. They can try hiding him and hope people start to forget the craziness, but it's a big risk.There's no easy answer for them.100%. If he were a normal candidate his team would be begging him to do one. I wouldn't be surprised if we see him less and less in the next few weeks - however in that situation they'd risk Harris hogging all the spotlight and coverage. I'm sure they're racking their brains on how to curate his public appearances to best minimize damage and maximize headlines.
We also get split screen shots of the voters legit looking displeased with him lol like a face shot of a guy asking him wtf was up with j6 and looking like "really?"I think this might be viewed as worse. These were questions from voters, not journalists.
I'm not an expert on AI, but you'd think it'd be able to work off of the thousands of pictures of her online to create an accurate likeness.AI generated shit is frequently a reflection of the white supremacist structures it was created under. Techbro engineers and whatever prompts people put in leads to this kind of shit.
Jesus Christ. I am rabidly anti-gun but would have easily and immediately been able to come up with a better pro-gun response to that question just through the osmosis of decades of bullshit Republican talking points.
This guy doesn't even have to play the game yet is a high chance of winning it.
Jesus Christ. I am rabidly anti-gun but would have easily and immediately been able to come up with a better pro-gun response to that question just through the osmosis of decades of bullshit Republican talking points.
This guy doesn't even have to play the game yet is a high chance of winning it.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Yea, they're caught between a rock and a hard place. Every time he opens his mouth is a disaster for the campaign, but if you hide him it just lets Kamala hog the spotlight. They can try hiding him and hope people start to forget the craziness, but it's a big risk.There's no easy answer for them.
His enablers and handlers deserve the hellish prison they've made for themselves by propping up this moron for the past 9 years lol. Can you just imagine for a moment the meetings the campaign heads have when Trump isn't in the room? They most definitely have to come up with strategies for how to explain things to Trump. Madness.Yea, they're caught between a rock and a hard place. Every time he opens his mouth is a disaster for the campaign, but if you hide him it just lets Kamala hog the spotlight. They can try hiding him and hope people start to forget the craziness, but it's a big risk.There's no easy answer for them.
Sir, what are your thoughts on climate change?
"There are very important parts of climate...water...air..."
How is it a disaster? He's gonna get at least 49% of the votes. Dude can seemingly say and do whatever he wants, he doesn't lose votes.
I was thinking similarly. Reminds me of how Kinect couldn't recognize Black people worth a damn at launch.AI generated shit is frequently a reflection of the white supremacist structures it was created under. Techbro engineers and whatever prompts people put in leads to this kind of shit.
Yeah it's basically 50/50 right now and I give all the credit to Kamala and her team for giving the dems at least a fighting shot. I think she needed a clearer, more audacious plan right from the outset. Made a few errors such as her housing plan. But she/team can be very proud even if Trump wins.I don't know what will happen at this point. But if Trump wins, I'm not blaming Kamala and her campaign. I can't really see anything they could be doing differently to run a better campaign (apart from a clean break with Biden on Gaza). This isn't Hilary's 2016 campaign; Harris and her campaign are putting in the work and making what appear to be the correct moves, like this Fox News interview.
He lost the last election and he's on track to lose this one too, I'd call that a disaster for him and his campaign. Especially since it'd likely be a very winnable race for any other Republican.How is it a disaster? He's gonna get at least 49% of the votes. Dude can seemingly say and do whatever he wants, he doesn't lose votes.
I'm not an expert on AI, but you'd think it'd be able to work off of the thousands of pictures of her online to create an accurate likeness.
Perceptions of the candidates and running mates
- Harris and her running mate Tim Walz are viewed more favorably by Americans than Trump and his running mate JD Vance
- Last week, after the vice presidential debate, Vance saw an increase in popularity; now Americans' evaluations of Vance are about as negative as they were before the debate
Because he was just reciting talking points, not actually thinking about a response.I'm trying to figure out why he said "nobody was killed" literally in the same breath and by the looks of it so is the audience.
Assuming it was her turn.This campaign that Harris is running only makes me question even more wtf Hillary was doing in 2016
Completely agree.If Kamala doesn't win, I don't think the race was ever winnable. They've run a tight campaign against the worst candidate and campaign in modern history. Not perfect, but the delta between the two is enormous, and if that isn't enough to win I don't think anything is.
I'm pretty well calibrated on the Trump News Cycle Index since 2015 and I can confidently say this news will not move the needle at all for or against Trump.