The fact that news outlets didn't immediately turn to Harris and splintered off in search of their own dream nominee should tell you how favorably people see her.
That's great, but they're both competing for the same office, so we have to equate the two. To do otherwise is to betray the severity of the situation.He's a fascist demagogue and his supporters don't give a shit. Trying to equate the two is a losing battle.
Yet the moment the opposite side falters in any way, everyone on it as well as everyone covering it eats it up like ravenous vultures.Because we've all been desensitized to his crazy shit so there's no allure in the media reporting on his gaffes and insanity
As I said earlier I genuinely think people severely underestimate what misogynoir does for a "swing voter."Okay, we switch to Kamala and what's next? Yes, she does a little better against Trump in the polls, but can we trust the electorate to back her? As an African American, I have thought about this. Can we depend on people to vote for her based on the fact that she's a woman and African American?
Yes, it's sad that I have to think like that, but this country still has along ways to go.
I'm less shocked at the way Biden sounds in that clip than him saying he didn't watch his debate performance. Granted, Obama didn't immediately watch his against Romney until his staff made him, and once he did he quickly realized where he had failed. Why hasn't any of Biden's staff sat him down and made him watch the debate, to really understand what he looked like to everyone else?
There's a growing consensus among Senate Democrats that the situation with Biden at the top of the ticket is untenable, and senators are trying to determine the best way to relay that message to an insulated president. Some senators don't think Biden has people around him who are giving him an accurate picture of the fallout, according to one Democratic senator and a senior Democratic aide.
Loading…
www.cnn.com
Harris is losing to Trump by 2, Biden is losing to Trump by 6. It's just one poll, etc etc. But she does the best against him versus anyone they tested (some of that is name rec, some of that isn't, she does much better with women, young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters).
Biden sounds like he's recovering from a serious cold and has a sore throat. Good lord are people overreacting.
Yeah there have been a few polls that shows she polls a few points better IIRC.Do we actually know that Harris polls better than Biden for the election? What admittedly little I've read seems pretty much the same as how Biden is polling.
His voice isn't great, but it sounds like his normal voice?He does not sound good. To truly change the narrative I feel like he needs to be 100% on at all times which I don't think he is capable of. It's not a cognitive deficit I'm worried about
- Had you cited a long history of her polling better than Biden, I would be inclined to agree that this has merit. But we don't have enough to say whether or not this is the case, and will be the case if it wasn't a hypothetical situation and people are worried about the election (look at how flared tensions are across this board)Harris is the best path forward because:
- In the few polls we've gotten, she polls better than Biden does against Trump (we need more)
- She can actually campaign and keep a schedule to barnstorm the country. Biden cannot.
- She can debate Trump. Biden clearly cannot.
- She can excited young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters based on her favorables versus Biden (which are better than his). Biden cannot.
- She can raise the money needed. I am not sure Biden can anymore.
- She is not one of the two most hated candidates of modern polling and 70-80% of voters don't think she's too old to serve for another 4 years.
Harris is not perfect. We cannot keep going down the route we're going on or we'll lose.
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.Do we actually know that Harris polls better than Biden for the election? What admittedly little I've read seems pretty much the same as how Biden is polling.
I just don't buy this. How many times has that happened. Those are not repeatable circumstances, and each exists with its own context.
We are running someone America desperately does not want us to run besides Democratic super faithful, and even half of them don't want Biden to run. If you're talking about fracturing your party, Biden is doing that now!
Harris is the best path forward because:
- In the few polls we've gotten, she polls better than Biden does against Trump (we need more)
- She can actually campaign and keep a schedule to barnstorm the country. Biden cannot.
- She can debate Trump. Biden clearly cannot.
- She can excited young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters based on her favorables versus Biden (which are better than his). Biden cannot.
- She can raise the money needed. I am not sure Biden can anymore.
- She is not one of the two most hated candidates of modern polling and 70-80% of voters don't think she's too old to serve for another 4 years.
Harris is not perfect. We cannot keep going down the route we're going on or we'll lose.
To be fair, stepping down for Kamala wouldn't require a brokered convention and, ideally if it were to happen, it wouldn't.
But honestly we're against two calculations that are shooting blind here. Stay with Biden -- who is massively down in the polls and highlighted some severe weaknesses in his ability to campaign in the hopes that he can pull it out. Or ditch hm for Kamala...which is something that hasn't been done before and would have to be weighed against what we do know: that every time Democrats run away from their leader, they lose.
What I mean is that they aren't held to the same standards because they don't follow the same rules. As you have seen with the erosion of protections lately, Trump is in a better position to have a firm grip on power in a way that a Democrat wouldn't, and a socialist leader would have even less influence on the government. It's the same office in name, but not in practice, so that is why it's a losing battle to equate the two, it's not that simple. Conservatives are overwhelmingly represented at higher levels of government and in the owner class, so their ability to influence and control the country is much higher than those that are trying to regulate, reform or full on revolt against this white supremacist capitalist system.That's great, but they're both competing for the same office, so we have to equate the two. To do otherwise is to betray the severity of the situation.
Yet the moment the opposite side falters in any way, everyone on it as well as everyone covering it eats it up like ravenous vultures.
What the fuck are we doing?
The man is still probably physically sick. You can't just will yourself into health. That's different than mental decline concerns.If you don't understand the optics he was facing this interview then I don't know what to tell you. The first thing millions of Americans are going to see of him since the debate is this interview where he sounds like shit.
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.
It's the firehouse treatment aka "give them something else to talk about". Biden team is completely idiotic cause they keep feeding the media more to report on and keeps the story in the news. It should be just "I'm running" and immediately switch the topic to something else. Imagine something like he went around the day after giving big checks to people with medical or student debt signifying him forgiving his debt?
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.
I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.
Now, does this ultimately mean that they shouldn't do it? Perhaps not. The only option I've seen go up that I've been completely against as pure fantasy is a truly contested convention that attempts to skip over Harris. That would be insane. But going with Harris, while there's at least a path there, is still a shot in the dark. We've got nothing but favorability polling to go on, tight polling at that, and historically we know what tends to happen to women in politics and their favorability when they're not in the driver's seat vs when they aren't.
(Seriously where was all this love for Kamala just weeks ago??? I wanna know. lol)
Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.
Thank you for the detailed reply. It's just very disheartening. All we can do is keep learning and helping others learn, I guess.What I mean is that they aren't held to the same standards because they don't follow the same rules. As you have seen with the erosion of protections lately, Trump is in a better position to have a firm grip on power in a way that a Democrat wouldn't , and a socialist leader would have even less influence on the government. It's the same office in name, but not in practice, so that is why it's a losing battle to equate the two, it's not that simple. Conservatives are overwhelmingly represented at higher levels of government and in the owner class, so their ability to influence and control the country is much higher than those that are trying to regulate, reform or full on revolt against this white supremacist capitalist system.
I mean why would they choose the VP of an historically unpopular president who barely polls any better?
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.
Democrats are ALREADY weak on Biden. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle. Multiple house Dems are now on the record in public interviews calling for him to step down.
Because we've seen the polling and Kamala Harris is the only one that polls as well (and in fact better) than Biden. Buttigieg, Newsom, Whitmer, Pritzker, etc all poll worse.In the polls I've seen she polls about a point better than Biden. That is well within margin of error. I agree that the rest of these points do have some merit but they do not outweigh any of the very real cons of choosing her or anyone else in my opinion.
If Biden withdraws, his delegates can vote for whomever. They do not have to necessarily vote for Harris. Besides Clyburn no one else as far as we know is trying to advocate for her as an alternative publicly or privately. I mean why would they choose the VP of an historically unpopular president who barely polls any better?
- yes, this is a wait and see.His voice isn't great, but it sounds like his normal voice?
- Had you cited a long history of her polling better than Biden, I would be inclined to agree that this has merit. But we don't have enough to say whether or not this is the case, and will be the case if it wasn't a hypothetical situation and people are worried about the election (look at how flared tensions are across this board)
- Sure...but Biden can also campaign? Like, sure, I have worries about his continued endurance. But his schedule thus far has not indicated an inability to campaign.
- This I agree with. But would her thumping Trump in a debate be the key to winning the election? I doubt it. I'm also going to point out, Kamala has had some shaky debate performances - she got bodied by Tulsi and honestly didn't impress against Pence.
- Her favorability for the past four years has been in-line with Biden's...?
- Sure - but money will come regardless of the nominee.
- Again...her approval rating and favorability has not historically trended higher than Biden's?
And I can tell you that if this continues, Biden will be weaker with Democrats than Kamala will.I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.
I imagine that the vast majority of people's exposure to Biden today was the Wisconsin rally.If you don't understand the optics he was facing this interview then I don't know what to tell you. The first thing millions of Americans are going to see of him since the debate is this interview where he sounds like shit.
I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.
Now, does this ultimately mean that they shouldn't do it? Perhaps not. The only option I've seen go up that I've been completely against as pure fantasy is a truly contested convention that attempts to skip over Harris. That would be insane. But going with Harris, while there's at least a path there, is still a shot in the dark. We've got nothing but favorability polling to go on, tight polling at that, and historically we know what tends to happen to women in politics and their favorability when they're not in the driver's seat vs when they aren't.
(Seriously where was all this love for Kamala just weeks ago??? I wanna know. lol)
Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.
Yes, until now. We need to wait and see, but in the one H2H polling we've gotten, she's does as well or better than Biden. Biden is also currently amidst a slide and does worse the higher quality the poll is. It's up to you whether you believe this is his floor (it probably isn't).In the polls I've seen she polls about a point better than Biden. That is well within margin of error. I agree that the rest of these points do have some merit but they do not outweigh any of the very real cons of choosing her or anyone else in my opinion.
Right, and I think the idea Democrats can only win with Biden on the ticket just isn't true, and if some of the energy convincing people Biden wasn't senile went towards convincing people to vote for Kamala (or whoever), I don't think it would go worse than Biden. People are gonna vote against Trump.I think regardless of who runs, Democrats are basically just banking on the hope that voters hate Trump enough to want to keep him out of office. I wish it weren't the case, but Biden just seems like a liability at this point to me.
Take a look at CNN's post-debate poll. You're using the AVERAGE of all polls, not post-debate polling. Granted, we need a lot more data but we haven't had much polling on Harris VS Trump.I've been searching for these polls and I cannot find them. She polls roughly the same as Biden in every poll I've seen.
I'm less shocked at the way Biden sounds in that clip than him saying he didn't watch his debate performance. Granted, Obama didn't immediately watch his against Romney until his staff made him, and once he did he quickly realized where he had failed. Why hasn't any of Biden's staff sat him down and made him watch the debate, to really understand what he looked like to everyone else?
I imagine that the vast majority of people's exposure to Biden today was the Wisconsin rally.
Biden literally reached his lowest approval rating ever on 538. I don't know how much more evidence you need!And I can tell you that if this continues, Biden will be weaker with Democrats than Kamala will.
Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.
Like, do people actually think this will get better? There is still four months of this left. You have to believe that the debate is a one-off, weird, never going to happen again scenario.Biden literally reached his lowest approval rating ever on 538. I don't know how much more evidence you need!
I imagine that the vast majority of people's exposure to Biden today was the Wisconsin rally.
What else would they have been exposed to today regarding Biden? I'm talking the average voter and not someone as terminally online as myself.
That can't be accurate, more people probably saw that 2020 misquote on TikTok than that rally.I imagine that the vast majority of people's exposure to Biden today was the Wisconsin rally.
- yes, this is a wait and see.
- Biden cannot campaign! He is doing like one rally a day. We need someone to barnstorm the country. Joe didn't even talk to any other elected officials until days after the campaign! He said he can't do events past 8pm? That is not sustainable.
- Yes, her winning a debate is good.
- No, Democratic donors are starting to withhold their money to Biden. Reed Hastings and the Disney heiress are huge signals to the donor community. It's going to get worse.
- Her approvals are now higher than Biden's are.
Take a look at both Reuters and CNN's post-debate polls. You're using the AVERAGE of all polls, not post-debate polling.
View: https://x.com/politics_polls/status/1808232545152029081?s=46&t=5q2U08gXVStIC0OkwBKlhA
View: https://x.com/politics_polls/status/1808174403231924401?s=46&t=5q2U08gXVStIC0OkwBKlhA
Mondale was at least able to win his home state. Looking at the polls, same can't be said for Scranton Joe.Debates don't win elections.
Both the media and voters agreed that Reagan utterly lost in the first debate against Mondale and yet Reagan won in a 49-state landslide.
So there's a single poll that shows her doing better than Biden? The other poll has Biden and Trump tied and Harris doing a single point better. A single poll doesn't instill any confidence that she would do any better.
I just don't buy this. How many times has that happened. Those are not repeatable circumstances, and each exists with its own context.
We are running someone America desperately does not want us to run besides Democratic super faithful, and even half of them don't want Biden to run. If you're talking about fracturing your party, Biden is doing that now!
Also as an aside people are genuinely gonna ruin their social media algorithms if they "like a moth to a flame" their way towards every single account disparaging Biden atm. How TF did Benny Johnson get posted ITT....
Debates don't win elections.
Both the media and voters agreed that Reagan utterly lost in the first debate against Mondale and yet Reagan won in a 49-state landslide.
So there's a single poll that shows her doing better than Biden? The other poll has Biden and Trump tied and Harris doing a single point better. A single poll doesn't instill any confidence that she would do any better.
No one will be perfect for four months, they just won't. Like, I honestly do not give a fuck if they dump Biden, but the rose colored glasses some people have about what that will actually look like is misguided.
This thread from Twitter sums it up pretty well, IMO: there's a structural issue in how the media and the parties work, structural issues that mean that infighting, self-destruction, and self-flagellation is what both the media and many in the party want from the Democrats. Until those issues are fixed, changing the name at the top of the ticket isn't going to magically make things better.
Thread by @drvolts on Thread Reader App
@drvolts: I haven't written much about politics since the debate, mainly because I'm so overwhelmed by disgust & contempt toward this country's media & commentariat that it has rendered me inarticulate with rage. Twi...…threadreaderapp.com