For US politics and election threads
Status
Not open for further replies.

SquirrelSr

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,392
The fact that news outlets didn't immediately turn to Harris and splintered off in search of their own dream nominee should tell you how favorably people see her.
 

JB2448

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,368
Florida
He's a fascist demagogue and his supporters don't give a shit. Trying to equate the two is a losing battle.
That's great, but they're both competing for the same office, so we have to equate the two. To do otherwise is to betray the severity of the situation.
Because we've all been desensitized to his crazy shit so there's no allure in the media reporting on his gaffes and insanity
Yet the moment the opposite side falters in any way, everyone on it as well as everyone covering it eats it up like ravenous vultures.
What the fuck are we doing?
 

Jarmel

The Jackrabbit Always Wins
Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,611
New York
Biden sounds like he's recovering from a serious cold and has a sore throat. Good lord are people overreacting.
 

B-Dubs

That's some catch, that catch-22
General Manager
Oct 25, 2017
35,146
Look, I just want to say this: you guys are having a discussion. Nothing that gets posted on Era will affect what happens next one way or another. That means you can have an honest discussion about what you believe and the reasoning that got you there. You don't need to worry about the GOP using your posts in shitty ways or convince voters of your side or whatever. It's a discussion, just treat it like one.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
56,454
Okay, we switch to Kamala and what's next? Yes, she does a little better against Trump in the polls, but can we trust the electorate to back her? As an African American, I have thought about this. Can we depend on people to vote for her based on the fact that she's a woman and African American?

Yes, it's sad that I have to think like that, but this country still has along ways to go.
As I said earlier I genuinely think people severely underestimate what misogynoir does for a "swing voter."

We live in the same country that "Couldn't get a beer with Hillary."
 

xfactor99

Member
Oct 28, 2017
799
I'm less shocked at the way Biden sounds in that clip than him saying he didn't watch his debate performance. Granted, Obama didn't immediately watch his against Romney until his staff made him, and once he did he quickly realized where he had failed. Why hasn't any of Biden's staff sat him down and made him watch the debate, to really understand what he looked like to everyone else?

It fits with the reportng earlier today where Senate Democrats say they think he is insulated and being protected from bad news by his hangers-on:

There's a growing consensus among Senate Democrats that the situation with Biden at the top of the ticket is untenable, and senators are trying to determine the best way to relay that message to an insulated president. Some senators don't think Biden has people around him who are giving him an accurate picture of the fallout, according to one Democratic senator and a senior Democratic aide.

 

Starlite

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
713
At this point I'm really starting to believe the stink of age and possible cognitive decline is too set in to fight against, especially if this interview is the sign of their best to counteract it.

Trump's base obviously doesn't care, but our base and undecideds/independents clearly do.
 

Book One

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,973
Do we actually know that Harris polls better than Biden for the election? What admittedly little I've read seems pretty much the same as how Biden is polling.
 

Allard

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,087

Loading…


Harris is losing to Trump by 2, Biden is losing to Trump by 6. It's just one poll, etc etc. But she does the best against him versus anyone they tested (some of that is name rec, some of that isn't, she does much better with women, young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters).

There is also the fact that largely she didn't really make a name for herself as the VP back in 2020, Biden camp has treated her VP position like something pre Dick Cheney, non-existent save for tie breaking vote in the senate. Which means all negatives toward Biden become her negatives because people don't know her a personal level only that she is another member of the administration. Its a gamble but I am leaning more and more they need to give Biden a chance to have a graceful end to his campaign and cede the way for his running mate to take up the mantle. I do believe there is a real narcissism level issue at hand here.

The way I think should be approached is with care basically a "Decided to fulfill my term as president and place my support and trust into the person who has had my back since the start to see things through, sometimes the bravest thing is knowing when to let someone else do the job you set out to do because they are best possible chance of fulfilling it." There is bravery in knowing when to quit and give someone else a chance. If Kamala Harris wins he will be well remembered for taking that step. They need to give a chance for it not to be a choice of punishment but in this is the best path forward for what he stands for as President. He can still be there to help make that happened.
 

Kusagari

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,681
Biden sounds like he's recovering from a serious cold and has a sore throat. Good lord are people overreacting.

If you don't understand the optics he was facing this interview then I don't know what to tell you. The first thing millions of Americans are going to see of him since the debate is this interview where he sounds like shit.
 

Rainy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,044
Do we actually know that Harris polls better than Biden for the election? What admittedly little I've read seems pretty much the same as how Biden is polling.
Yeah there have been a few polls that shows she polls a few points better IIRC.

I'd probably be more worried as to how she would do in the rust belt states as that is where the election will be decided, but you could argue that she might boost the Black vote in Detroit/Philly too.
 

Chaos Legion

The Wise Ones
Member
Oct 30, 2017
17,191
He does not sound good. To truly change the narrative I feel like he needs to be 100% on at all times which I don't think he is capable of. It's not a cognitive deficit I'm worried about
His voice isn't great, but it sounds like his normal voice?

Harris is the best path forward because:

- In the few polls we've gotten, she polls better than Biden does against Trump (we need more)
- She can actually campaign and keep a schedule to barnstorm the country. Biden cannot.
- She can debate Trump. Biden clearly cannot.
- She can excited young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters based on her favorables versus Biden (which are better than his). Biden cannot.
- She can raise the money needed. I am not sure Biden can anymore.
- She is not one of the two most hated candidates of modern polling and 70-80% of voters don't think she's too old to serve for another 4 years.

Harris is not perfect. We cannot keep going down the route we're going on or we'll lose.
- Had you cited a long history of her polling better than Biden, I would be inclined to agree that this has merit. But we don't have enough to say whether or not this is the case, and will be the case if it wasn't a hypothetical situation and people are worried about the election (look at how flared tensions are across this board)
- Sure...but Biden can also campaign? Like, sure, I have worries about his continued endurance. But his schedule thus far has not indicated an inability to campaign.
- This I agree with. But would her thumping Trump in a debate be the key to winning the election? I doubt it. I'm also going to point out, Kamala has had some shaky debate performances - she got bodied by Tulsi and honestly didn't impress against Pence.
- Her favorability for the past four years has been in-line with Biden's...?
- Sure - but money will come regardless of the nominee.
- Again...her approval rating and favorability has not historically trended higher than Biden's?
 

Rychu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,207
Utah, USA
Do we actually know that Harris polls better than Biden for the election? What admittedly little I've read seems pretty much the same as how Biden is polling.
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.
 

Royalan

Not actually the youngest mod — AP Fact Check
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
14,414
I just don't buy this. How many times has that happened. Those are not repeatable circumstances, and each exists with its own context.

We are running someone America desperately does not want us to run besides Democratic super faithful, and even half of them don't want Biden to run. If you're talking about fracturing your party, Biden is doing that now!

I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.

Now, does this ultimately mean that they shouldn't do it? Perhaps not. The only option I've seen go up that I've been completely against as pure fantasy is a truly contested convention that attempts to skip over Harris. That would be insane. But going with Harris, while there's at least a path there, is still a shot in the dark. We've got nothing but favorability polling to go on, tight polling at that, and historically we know what tends to happen to women in politics and their favorability when they're not in the driver's seat vs when they aren't.

(Seriously where was all this love for Kamala just weeks ago??? I wanna know. lol)

Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They're both fraught with their own perils.
 
Last edited:

Mr. RPG

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,742
Harris is the best path forward because:

- In the few polls we've gotten, she polls better than Biden does against Trump (we need more)
- She can actually campaign and keep a schedule to barnstorm the country. Biden cannot.
- She can debate Trump. Biden clearly cannot.
- She can excited young voters, Black voters, and Latino voters based on her favorables versus Biden (which are better than his). Biden cannot.
- She can raise the money needed. I am not sure Biden can anymore.
- She is not one of the two most hated candidates of modern polling and 70-80% of voters don't think she's too old to serve for another 4 years.

Harris is not perfect. We cannot keep going down the route we're going on or we'll lose.

In the polls I've seen she polls about a point better than Biden. That is well within margin of error. I agree that the rest of these points do have some merit but they do not outweigh any of the very real cons of choosing her or anyone else in my opinion.

To be fair, stepping down for Kamala wouldn't require a brokered convention and, ideally if it were to happen, it wouldn't.

But honestly we're against two calculations that are shooting blind here. Stay with Biden -- who is massively down in the polls and highlighted some severe weaknesses in his ability to campaign in the hopes that he can pull it out. Or ditch hm for Kamala...which is something that hasn't been done before and would have to be weighed against what we do know: that every time Democrats run away from their leader, they lose.

If Biden withdraws, his delegates can vote for whomever. They do not have to necessarily vote for Harris. Besides Clyburn no one else as far as we know is trying to advocate for her as an alternative publicly or privately. I mean why would they choose the VP of an historically unpopular president who barely polls any better?
 

Booshka

Member
May 8, 2018
4,973
Amherst, MA
That's great, but they're both competing for the same office, so we have to equate the two. To do otherwise is to betray the severity of the situation.

Yet the moment the opposite side falters in any way, everyone on it as well as everyone covering it eats it up like ravenous vultures.
What the fuck are we doing?
What I mean is that they aren't held to the same standards because they don't follow the same rules. As you have seen with the erosion of protections lately, Trump is in a better position to have a firm grip on power in a way that a Democrat wouldn't, and a socialist leader would have even less influence on the government. It's the same office in name, but not in practice, so that is why it's a losing battle to equate the two, it's not that simple. Conservatives are overwhelmingly represented at higher levels of government and in the owner class, so their ability to influence and control the country is much higher than those that are trying to regulate, reform or full on revolt against this white supremacist capitalist system.
 

Jarmel

The Jackrabbit Always Wins
Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,611
New York
If you don't understand the optics he was facing this interview then I don't know what to tell you. The first thing millions of Americans are going to see of him since the debate is this interview where he sounds like shit.
The man is still probably physically sick. You can't just will yourself into health. That's different than mental decline concerns.
 

BWoog

Member
Oct 27, 2017
40,298
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.

Kamala could get out there and hammer home the abortion issue to kingdom come, start pointing at Trump losing his mind, and have the very high benefit of being in her 50s.

Even after the debate I was fine with sticking with Biden but I think Harris is the way to go now, because as others have said, it's not like he's going to get younger in the next four months.
 

greepoman

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,068
Trump seems to be able to time and time again. How?
It's the firehouse treatment aka "give them something else to talk about". Biden team is completely idiotic cause they keep feeding the media more to report on and keeps the story in the news. It should be just "I'm running" and immediately switch the topic to something else. Imagine something like he went around the day after giving big checks to people with medical or student debt signifying him forgiving his debt?
 

Book One

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,973
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.

Do you have any links to this? I'd like to read them, see what polls they are, etc.
 

Kusagari

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,681
I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.

Now, does this ultimately mean that they shouldn't do it? Perhaps not. The only option I've seen go up that I've been completely against as pure fantasy is a truly contested convention that attempts to skip over Harris. That would be insane. But going with Harris, while there's at least a path there, is still a shot in the dark. We've got nothing but favorability polling to go on, tight polling at that, and historically we know what tends to happen to women in politics and their favorability when they're not in the driver's seat vs when they aren't.

(Seriously where was all this love for Kamala just weeks ago??? I wanna know. lol)

Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.

Democrats are ALREADY weak on Biden. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle. Multiple house Dems are now on the record in public interviews calling for him to step down.
 

JB2448

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,368
Florida
What I mean is that they aren't held to the same standards because they don't follow the same rules. As you have seen with the erosion of protections lately, Trump is in a better position to have a firm grip on power in a way that a Democrat wouldn't , and a socialist leader would have even less influence on the government. It's the same office in name, but not in practice, so that is why it's a losing battle to equate the two, it's not that simple. Conservatives are overwhelmingly represented at higher levels of government and in the owner class, so their ability to influence and control the country is much higher than those that are trying to regulate, reform or full on revolt against this white supremacist capitalist system.
Thank you for the detailed reply. It's just very disheartening. All we can do is keep learning and helping others learn, I guess.
 

Mr. RPG

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,742
Right now, in post-debate polling, she is polling 3 or 4 points better than Biden. Usually tied with Trump, 1 point below Trump or 1 point leading him. Biden has dropped to being -4 or -5 with Trump winning the election in pretty much every nationwide poll.

I've been searching for these polls and I cannot find them. She polls roughly the same as Biden in every poll I've seen.
 

Royalan

Not actually the youngest mod — AP Fact Check
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
14,414
Democrats are ALREADY weak on Biden. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle. Multiple house Dems are now on the record in public interviews calling for him to step down.

This is true. But there's a difference between Dems being weak on Biden, and Dems ditching Biden and essentially anointing Trump a kingslayer.

Just sayin' these are the things people need to be thinking about!
 

scitek

Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,142
I think regardless of who runs, Democrats are basically just banking on the hope that voters hate Trump enough to want to keep him out of office. I wish it weren't the case, but Biden just seems like a liability at this point to me.
 

Rychu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,207
Utah, USA
In the polls I've seen she polls about a point better than Biden. That is well within margin of error. I agree that the rest of these points do have some merit but they do not outweigh any of the very real cons of choosing her or anyone else in my opinion.



If Biden withdraws, his delegates can vote for whomever. They do not have to necessarily vote for Harris. Besides Clyburn no one else as far as we know is trying to advocate for her as an alternative publicly or privately. I mean why would they choose the VP of an historically unpopular president who barely polls any better?
Because we've seen the polling and Kamala Harris is the only one that polls as well (and in fact better) than Biden. Buttigieg, Newsom, Whitmer, Pritzker, etc all poll worse.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
17,101
His voice isn't great, but it sounds like his normal voice?


- Had you cited a long history of her polling better than Biden, I would be inclined to agree that this has merit. But we don't have enough to say whether or not this is the case, and will be the case if it wasn't a hypothetical situation and people are worried about the election (look at how flared tensions are across this board)
- Sure...but Biden can also campaign? Like, sure, I have worries about his continued endurance. But his schedule thus far has not indicated an inability to campaign.
- This I agree with. But would her thumping Trump in a debate be the key to winning the election? I doubt it. I'm also going to point out, Kamala has had some shaky debate performances - she got bodied by Tulsi and honestly didn't impress against Pence.
- Her favorability for the past four years has been in-line with Biden's...?
- Sure - but money will come regardless of the nominee.
- Again...her approval rating and favorability has not historically trended higher than Biden's?
- yes, this is a wait and see.
- Biden cannot campaign! He is doing like one rally a day. We need someone to barnstorm the country. Joe didn't even talk to any other elected officials until days after the campaign! He said he can't do events past 8pm? That is not sustainable.
- Yes, her winning a debate is good.
- No, Democratic donors are starting to withhold their money to Biden. Reed Hastings and the Disney heiress are huge signals to the donor community. It's going to get worse.
- Her approvals are now higher than Biden's are.
 

krazykazama89

Member
May 1, 2024
620
We seriously need more data on Kamala vs trump, favourabilty and how she would do in the swing states.

The big worry is her campaigning skills, even Biden how he is seems to be better on the stump.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
17,101
I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.
And I can tell you that if this continues, Biden will be weaker with Democrats than Kamala will.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
56,454
If you don't understand the optics he was facing this interview then I don't know what to tell you. The first thing millions of Americans are going to see of him since the debate is this interview where he sounds like shit.
I imagine that the vast majority of people's exposure to Biden today was the Wisconsin rally.
 

Allard

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,087
I mean, you can say that, and you'd be right on the context. But it's not for us to "buy it." Whenever Democrats have been weak on their nominee, they've gotten creamed by Republicans.

Now, does this ultimately mean that they shouldn't do it? Perhaps not. The only option I've seen go up that I've been completely against as pure fantasy is a truly contested convention that attempts to skip over Harris. That would be insane. But going with Harris, while there's at least a path there, is still a shot in the dark. We've got nothing but favorability polling to go on, tight polling at that, and historically we know what tends to happen to women in politics and their favorability when they're not in the driver's seat vs when they aren't.

(Seriously where was all this love for Kamala just weeks ago??? I wanna know. lol)

Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.

Hey I never hated Harris and in fact felt annoyed after having such a spirited Team with Biden and Obama that a similar thing didn't appear to manifest. There are still some aspects of Harris that are up in the air from her campaigns and even VP work back in 2020, but we haven't really even "seen" much of her doing stuff which can be both a negative and positive. Negative because it means establishing trust coming from a negative applied administration, but also positive in that she is in a position too make a name for herself separate from Biden.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
17,101
In the polls I've seen she polls about a point better than Biden. That is well within margin of error. I agree that the rest of these points do have some merit but they do not outweigh any of the very real cons of choosing her or anyone else in my opinion.
Yes, until now. We need to wait and see, but in the one H2H polling we've gotten, she's does as well or better than Biden. Biden is also currently amidst a slide and does worse the higher quality the poll is. It's up to you whether you believe this is his floor (it probably isn't).
 

Kitschy Kitty

Member
Oct 25, 2017
946
I think regardless of who runs, Democrats are basically just banking on the hope that voters hate Trump enough to want to keep him out of office. I wish it weren't the case, but Biden just seems like a liability at this point to me.
Right, and I think the idea Democrats can only win with Biden on the ticket just isn't true, and if some of the energy convincing people Biden wasn't senile went towards convincing people to vote for Kamala (or whoever), I don't think it would go worse than Biden. People are gonna vote against Trump.
 

Rychu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,207
Utah, USA
I've been searching for these polls and I cannot find them. She polls roughly the same as Biden in every poll I've seen.
Take a look at CNN's post-debate poll. You're using the AVERAGE of all polls, not post-debate polling. Granted, we need a lot more data but we haven't had much polling on Harris VS Trump.

View: https://x.com/politics_polls/status/1808232545152029081?s=46&t=5q2U08gXVStIC0OkwBKlhA

View: https://x.com/politics_polls/status/1808174403231924401?s=46&t=5q2U08gXVStIC0OkwBKlhA

View: https://x.com/politics_polls/status/1808352367131123811?s=46&t=5q2U08gXVStIC0OkwBKlhA
 

jrjo

Member
Jun 29, 2024
76
I'm less shocked at the way Biden sounds in that clip than him saying he didn't watch his debate performance. Granted, Obama didn't immediately watch his against Romney until his staff made him, and once he did he quickly realized where he had failed. Why hasn't any of Biden's staff sat him down and made him watch the debate, to really understand what he looked like to everyone else?

Maybe he doesn't want to relive the worst moments of his political career. Personally, I know I wouldn't want to watch a video of myself as I fall into senility. Overall, it would be a despairing experience. I really do pity him.
 

ZedLilIndPum

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,195
Personally, I'm not yet at the point where I'm seeing either option as the clear choice. They both fraught with their own perils.

This is where I'm at. The weight of the discussion here and online has been about the cons of Biden staying in, but I hope people aren't underestimating the shitstorm that will be triggered by forcing him out.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
17,101
Biden literally reached his lowest approval rating ever on 538. I don't know how much more evidence you need!
Like, do people actually think this will get better? There is still four months of this left. You have to believe that the debate is a one-off, weird, never going to happen again scenario.

It's not.
 

Crossing Eden

Member
Oct 26, 2017
56,454
Also as an aside people are genuinely gonna ruin their social media algorithms if they "like a moth to a flame" their way towards every single account disparaging Biden atm. How TF did Benny Johnson get posted ITT....

Do you really believe this?
What else would they have been exposed to today regarding Biden? I'm talking the average voter and not someone as terminally online as myself.
 

fragamemnon

Member
Nov 30, 2017
7,244
Agreed on the getting better part, that goes against the lived experience of aging that everyone can relate to.

Again this comes down to if you want to lose with certainty or take a bigger risk in the hopes of winning. And if you do not take that big risk, you cannot claim Trump is an existential threat. And if Trump is not an existential threat to democracy, then what else have Democrats been lying to people about?
 

Mr. RPG

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,742
- yes, this is a wait and see.
- Biden cannot campaign! He is doing like one rally a day. We need someone to barnstorm the country. Joe didn't even talk to any other elected officials until days after the campaign! He said he can't do events past 8pm? That is not sustainable.
- Yes, her winning a debate is good.
- No, Democratic donors are starting to withhold their money to Biden. Reed Hastings and the Disney heiress are huge signals to the donor community. It's going to get worse.
- Her approvals are now higher than Biden's are.

Debates don't win elections.

Both the media and voters agreed that Reagan utterly lost in the first debate against Mondale and yet Reagan won in a 49-state landslide.



So there's a single poll that shows her doing better than Biden? The other poll has Biden and Trump tied and Harris doing a single point better. A single poll doesn't instill any confidence that she would do any better.
 

jrjo

Member
Jun 29, 2024
76
Debates don't win elections.

Both the media and voters agreed that Reagan utterly lost in the first debate against Mondale and yet Reagan won in a 49-state landslide.



So there's a single poll that shows her doing better than Biden? The other poll has Biden and Trump tied and Harris doing a single point better. A single poll doesn't instill any confidence that she would do any better.
Mondale was at least able to win his home state. Looking at the polls, same can't be said for Scranton Joe.
 
Oct 26, 2017
7,718
I just don't buy this. How many times has that happened. Those are not repeatable circumstances, and each exists with its own context.

We are running someone America desperately does not want us to run besides Democratic super faithful, and even half of them don't want Biden to run. If you're talking about fracturing your party, Biden is doing that now!

Yeah even people who like Biden personally, they are extremely uncomfortable with having someone who is over 80 years old, with clear wear and tear, be the most powerful person in the world for another 4 and a half years.

When I hear people complain about Biden, 80% of time it's age related. With the remaining 20% being a mixture of inflation and Gaza (I live in California). No party in American history has run a candidate this old. This is on the heals of RBG and Dianne Feinstein who were clearly in office way past the point they should have been. The democratic party and the country suffered because they didn't step down before it got ridiculous. There are a lot of people in the Democratic party who are simply tired of old politicians refusing to relinquish power and the handlers around them who give them cover. This is being reflected in Biden's low approval numbers despite the majority of Democrats liking him personally or thinking he has done a pretty solid job all things considered.

The horrendous debate made a lot of Democrats feel Biden was less a Bernie Sanders old person and more of a RBG and Feinstein on borrowed time.

And the clips that are coming out from the ABC interview, Biden still doesn't sound great. Not debate bad, but not Dark Brandon good either. His vitality does seem to fluctuate in ways that's still unclear to the rest of us and that's a scary prospect for the fall.
 

Royalan

Not actually the youngest mod — AP Fact Check
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
14,414
Also as an aside people are genuinely gonna ruin their social media algorithms if they "like a moth to a flame" their way towards every single account disparaging Biden atm. How TF did Benny Johnson get posted ITT....

As a general rule, I would encourage this.

For example, I haven't watched any of the clips in full yet. Played one for a few seconds just to gauge his voice (which is his #1 issue, imo), heard that it was much clearer but still hoarse, but then paused the clip because I had to run to Target.

But it's surprising to me how positive my Threads feed is on Biden's interview and rally today compared to this thread, as I only follow journalists.

(and then I remember that I mostly follow Black journalists)

I'm going to wait until I can sit and watch the entire interview before I form a full opinion on it, but I think it's tough to say that people are univerally down on his performance today. That's just not what I'm seeing.
 

eyeball_kid

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,033
Debates don't win elections.

Both the media and voters agreed that Reagan utterly lost in the first debate against Mondale and yet Reagan won in a 49-state landslide.



So there's a single poll that shows her doing better than Biden? The other poll has Biden and Trump tied and Harris doing a single point better. A single poll doesn't instill any confidence that she would do any better.

Polls reflect the moment and circumstance.

You put Kamala in the driver's seat with the full backing of the Democratic party behind her, have her do a few energized rallies, and I think those numbers will go up. Perhaps that's me with delusional thinking, but I've got to believe.
 

GardenPepper

Member
Oct 28, 2017
20,478
An energized Harris out there would be a very large contrast against her opponent right now.

No one will be perfect for four months, they just won't. Like, I honestly do not give a fuck if they dump Biden, but the rose colored glasses some people have about what that will actually look like is misguided.

This thread from Twitter sums it up pretty well, IMO: there's a structural issue in how the media and the parties work, structural issues that mean that infighting, self-destruction, and self-flagellation is what both the media and many in the party want from the Democrats. Until those issues are fixed, changing the name at the top of the ticket isn't going to magically make things better.

threadreaderapp.com

Thread by @drvolts on Thread Reader App

@drvolts: I haven't written much about politics since the debate, mainly because I'm so overwhelmed by disgust & contempt toward this country's media & commentariat that it has rendered me inarticulate with rage. Twi...…

So? If the media wants Trump back, they'll do whatever they want to get him back.

This is about getting a candidate in place that the vast majority of American voters thinks can mentally and physically do the job. The media is inconsequential at that point. They'll continue doing what they do. It's up to the campaign to convince voters, as it always is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.