You know, everybody else has addressed the rest of this post.
But it's hilarious how you're attempting to equate Hillary and Bloomberg to try to justify the latter.
edit: and what MizerMan said of course
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 2| Dershowitz says "Quid Pro Quo on the Go?" [See Staff Post]
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
You know, everybody else has addressed the rest of this post.
But it's hilarious how you're attempting to equate Hillary and Bloomberg to try to justify the latter.
edit: and what MizerMan said of course
I'm catching up on the last episode of Stumptown, and there was an ad for our little racist friend, trying to tie him to President Obama. He's just flooding everything with ads.
No. People voting for Trump is how we ended up with Trump in the first place.
Huh, I just heard about a friend of a friend in Memphis who just quit an 8k/month job as a Bloomberg organizer because her boss was abusive.
Looks like the source is Drudge.. but.. if this shit is true lol
Bloomberg reportedly considering Hillary Clinton as his running mate
Bloomberg’s internal polling has found the combo “would be a formidable force,” campaign sources told the Drudge Report Saturday.nypost.com
Twitter would explode.
This timeline is already fucked enough.
I suggested this as a joke the other day 😱Bloomberg reportedly considering Hillary Clinton as his running mate
Bloomberg’s internal polling has found the combo “would be a formidable force,” campaign sources told the Drudge Report Saturday.
Twitter would explode.
NY Post via Drudge. What a distinguished provenance for a story!Bloomberg reportedly considering Hillary Clinton as his running mate
Bloomberg’s internal polling has found the combo “would be a formidable force,” campaign sources told the Drudge Report Saturday.
Twitter would explode.
MSNBC heard the rumors too and Bloomberg campaign refused to deny it when asked.
If this gets idiots who believe this to vote for someone else in the primary, so be it.
I was gonna say lol, at least this would mean Bloomberg wouldn't be the nominee
i mean
do we actually know this
(whisperwhisperbrokeredconventionwhisperwhisper)
Hillary is a vortex of discomfort
If she did, we would look back and say "of course"
At this stage probably not. If she could have used it to boost her chances at the Presidency sure but that ship has sailed for her.
It's really insane that democratic voters are responding to a Trump presidency by voting for their own Trump-like candidate.
I'm as pragmatic as anybody, and i've gotten into heated debates with countless people to vote for a moderate democrat if they're the nominee, but Bloomberg is so bad that i wouldn't blame someone for not voting for him in the general. It would be a disaster if Trump won again, but at the very least it would send the message to democratic voters not to just elect a guy because you saw him in a commercial and that democrats won't really around a racist piece of shit, make them fear for the electability of their racist candidate.
I'm as pragmatic as anybody, and i've gotten into heated debates with countless people to vote for a moderate democrat if they're the nominee, but Bloomberg is so bad that i wouldn't blame someone for not voting for him in the general. It would be a disaster if Trump won again, but at the very least it would send the message to democratic voters not to just elect a guy because you saw him in a commercial and that democrats won't really around a racist piece of shit, make them fear for the electability of their racist candidate.
Shit, can you imagine who Bloomberg would nominate in RBG's stead? We'd be so, so very fucked.
Totally. The first sentence in the first draft of that post was actually 'Bloomberg is the unity candidate, just not in the way he wants...' and then I rambled on a bunch, and then I hated all of the words and started over.
That's the one thing where there isn't a possibility he's worse than Trump on. What's the venn diagram of judges that are tight on gun control, pro-choice and are also shit on LGBT+ issues and would also pass a dem controlled Senate? He certainly wouldn't be nominating heritage foundation cronies.
But nobody's voted for him yet sans some write-ins. He won't even be on the ballot in South Carolina.
Aaron Blake on Twitter
“The president of the United States RTs a video featuring a guy repeatedly farting on a hot mic”twitter.com
This was literally a scene in the Naked Gun 30 years ago
Better than who trump would nominate.
I feel like y'all don't realize the alternative is 4 more years of trump. Not one person is arguing to support Bloomberg in the primary here, but if he is the nominee he will be infinitely better than trump.
The choice wouldn't have to be worse than Trump's. He would only have to replace RBG with someone who would favor him, which automatically makes it a terrible choice that affects the SC for decades.
Our institutions have failed us on every conceivable level if Bloomberg is the nomination. The problem becomes much, much bigger than the next four years. (also lol that bloomberg wouldn't favor the rich)
I'll vote downballot if he's the nomination.
No he won't. Bloomberg will abuse his executive power just as much as Trump and be far more efficient and effective in doing so. And the Democratic Party establishment will do nothing to stop him.
I don't think better is the right word. Different, but probably not better.
The alternative in that case is a heritage foundation hack that wouldn't even entertain letting anything through the supreme court that even hints at better and strike down rights already in place.
Because otherwise McConnell will block anything and the one thing Bloomberg's completely and utterly consistent on is being anti-2nd amendment, which McConnell would not abide.
Bloomberg isn't principled enough to care about that. I could easily see him appointing someone palatable to the GOP Senate.
And you can trust Bloomberg to not create the same environment, just with a different flavor? Dude is not in this for the health of our Union. He's running for the Office of President to benefit himself, as far as I can tell, and in that way he is a lot like Trump.
Then you don't know Mitch well enough if you think he's ever letting a Dem SCOTUS pick get through, even if they do mostly align with the GOP values.
Bloomberg refused to support Roberts'
nomination to the SC, while he was a dirty Republican, because he did not believe Roberts would be a defender of Roe v Wade.
His nomination would be miles better than the next kook Trump would pick.
nomination to the SC, while he was a dirty Republican, because he did not believe Roberts would be a defender of Roe v Wade.
His nomination would be miles better than the next kook Trump would pick.
For what? What does Bloomberg gain from appointing a Republican judge after winning the democratic primary, presumably campaigning on appointing certain types of judges? He's too vain for that. He already was against Roberts when he was a pub.
You're kinda arguing past me assuming I have even a modicum of respect for Bloomberg.
Yeah but bloom is awful and that means everything will be just as bad or worse than trump, forget details or specifics. /s
I think I would rather let the bench remain empty than let Bloomberg pick somebody tbh
I feel like by arguing about Bloomberg I'm accidentally pushing people to support him more.
Fuck. This is so messed up. I think I'll just walk away now.
Fuck. This is so messed up. I think I'll just walk away now.
Bloomberg reportedly considering Hillary Clinton as his running mate
Bloomberg’s internal polling has found the combo “would be a formidable force,” campaign sources told the Drudge Report Saturday.
Twitter would explode.
I just came to post this.... saw it as a FOX News Youtube vid headline, and thought it might've been some of the usual Fox BS, but I guess not if it's also sourced by NYPost
No one is fucking supporting him in this thread. Thinking that they are... like what?
Seeing how bloomberg has been working behind the scenes for years manipulating the system has completely turned me into a big Bernie supporter. If he wants to put endless money towards stopping trump he is welcome to do so but it will be horrifying for him to win the primary.
This is strange.
twitter.com
Megan Messerly on Twitter
“BREAKING: @SenatorReid says he voted uncommitted three times during early vote, not in support of any candidate. “I have so many friends and such admiration for the work they’re doing,” he said.”
twitter.com
- Status