NASA’s approach to UFOs appears remarkably unscientific
NASA’s UAP Study Team, it would appear, has its work cut out for itself.thehill.com
On the "IC", the "IC" is the Intelligence Community, which would be the 18 intelligence agencies in the U.S. government. The Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IGIC) is who Grusch's complaint ultimately went to after he was retaliated against. The IGIC did a preliminary investigation as required and found his complaint was credible, then passed it on to Congress. When people say the "IC" was involved in the latest hit piece, they would probably be referring to someone in the agency he was a part of, or another agency that has an interest in discrediting him.
'Scientific curiosity' is a thing touted by NASA as part of its marketing. In reality it's bureaucracy and project management to the core, some even at the expense of human lives. In reality you'll lose your credibility and maybe even future jobs if you show any real curious towards the potential of unexplained phenomenon right here on Earth.
Read Diane Vaughan's book on how organizational culture was at the heart of the challenger disaster.
you don't need to read a book - it is a well-known conclusion as reached by the official investigation after the disaster and reported on widely after the fact
All I'm saying is NASA isn't perfect. Like all organizations it's prone to mistakes, bad decisions, and bad culture.
no disagreement there lol
Yeah, it was a case study in my project management class on groupthink.
Yeah, getting MAGA type people vibes sometimes here. "ALL Scientists are corrupt!!!!""""
www.reddit.com
With all sincerity, what the hell is this post? I've been banned for reporting these types of comments before, so I don't want to spark a back-and-forth, but genuinely don't understand how it's allowed.
Careful, you're gonna get flagged for conspiratorial talk.
I think it's troubling when people call people working at NASA "not curious" / lacking curiousity or a bureaucratic mess just to make them less serious or less credible. I'm not saying people here are MAGA. I'm just saying this mindset of trying to discredit/ridicule scientists whenever they don't do or say what you want is exactly like how those people react. Not saying NASA doesn't make mistakes. But that wasn't hat was implied with "they're not curious".
You're not accusing people here of being MAGA after saying "Yeah, getting MAGA type people vibes sometimes here"?
No. Exactly what i explained. It's that aspect of MAGA people. And it's a scary aspect. Be critical of NASA but to imply they're not to be taken serious is kinda scary imo.
Dude, has anyone in this thread said "ALL Scientists are corrupt!" like you exaggerated in your original post? Isn't it dangerous for you to mischaracterise the discussion here and slander other posters?
I didn't agree at all that that was being critical. How did you read that? Be critical but don't just brush them away as not to be taken seriously.
And its based off such an obviously fake video too. Theres just too many people in the ufo community that are too invested in it to see it critically imo. And it scares away legitimate discussion and investigation.
lol i'll save the long paragraph and just say ya can't let the rookies and the rooks run the roost.
There was that video a few days ago that was also posted on that reddit that had a large airliner and 3 small ufos that start to fly circles around, and then they all just blip out and disappear. I cant tell if they are thinking that that airliner was MH370 or if the same thing might have happened to it.
Redditors are presuming that airliner is the MH370. They're discussing that video.
Yeah I have seen the video, I believe that a number of members in r/ufos believe that it is flight MH370.
Unbelievable. What is it with this topic that makes people make the wildest accusations about other users.
And his claims are mainly people coming to him with information. So even in the scenario where it is all made up, Grusch doesn't have to be lying himself. People coming to him with info can still be the truth, even if the information ends up being not true.
