Whoa there
Trevorrow already said none of the art from this book leaked is related to his treatment.
See this post: https://www.resetera.com/threads/th...epublished-with-changes.166014/#post-28446757
Whoa there
Trevorrow already said none of the art from this book leaked is related to his treatment.
Except the documentary is painted as a triumph, as in "everything worked out great."
Awesome, I wanna see the Palpatine art.The OP is missing all kinds of important information.
The Art of The Rise of Skywalker was scheduled to come out the same day as the movie. A little more than a week before then it was delayed until March. Previous art books in the series had released day and date with the movie but did not include art from the climaxes of the films so as to avoid spoilers. That art was included in the next movie's art book, i.e. art from the end of The Force Awakens was published in The Art of The Last Jedi and art from the end of The Last Jedi is expected to be in The Art of The Rise of Skywalker. It's highly likely that The Art of The Rise of Skywalker was delayed so that it could include pieces from the entire movie. Why it was not originally scheduled to come out later is unknown.
The South Korean version of the art book was released a week ago, for unknown reasons. It is missing art of Palpatine, Exegol, and the end of the film. It is incredibly likely that this is the version of the book originally intended to come out last month. The delay happened late enough that it appears South Korean copies had already been printed. The publisher is recalling them. This recall is only happening in South Korea and there is no additional delay for any other territory.
There's no indication that anything in this erroneously released version will be altered or removed in the official version
Destroying unsold copies is standard operating procedure in the book business.
That still belongs to empire or new hopeI mean, everything worked out great for The Last Jedi and it is a triumph. Likely the best made Star Wars film in fact.
lol, come on, that TPM behind the scenes feature is fucking nothing like Hearts of Darkness. And I think people have always projected their own feelings about TPM onto what's seen in the doc and interpreted some more mundane moments into these supposedly grim harbingers of what a bad movie it would be. Like that infamous shot of McCallum in a screening room always gets interpreted as a "look at this shit, what have I done" look but in the actual film it just came off to me as the guy watching a movie. Or Lucas' "I may have gone too far", which iirc was more about the film's editing being paced to the point of incoherence, and cutting from scene to scene or shot to shot way too quickly. It wasn't "I may have gone too far" in the sense of "Wow this movie really sucks and everyone will hate it."
Everything "worked out great" in the Director and the Jedi because the movie was made and came out on time. How else could it have ended? The movie exists as its director intended! if Disney wanted just a portrait of the filmmaking where everything was always great, and the actors were always on board with Rian from jump, and there was nothing but smooth sailing with only the most perfunctory, superficial documenting of certain production details, they could've easily sanitized the doc to show that. They didn't. Just like they didn't scrub all of the unused ideas and characters and designs from the TFA art book either.
I mean, everything worked out great for The Last Jedi and it is a triumph. Likely the best made Star Wars film in fact.
TPM documentary is a far more "honest" documentary as it's a far more "boring" documentary as we watch the minutiae of film-making, it's not really creating a narrative as much as showing the BTS of making TPM. TLJ documentary is specifically edited towards a certain narrative and thus isn't interested in minutiae or conflict in filmmaking that doesn't fit this narrative.
Because the narrative being spun right now from leaks from South Korea is fueling the belief that it and the leaked early draft would've give us a far more satisfying story. Whether that hypothetical is true or not, it's not the narrative Disney wants out there right now with the movie still in theaters.WTF? The art book is supposed to show early concept art whether it was used or not? Why would you destroy or hide the artwork of talented artists?
Probably. It's the only thing I can think of.Probably contains art from the original cut and they don't; want to fuel the fire even more ..
The Last Jedi art book also has art from the Lucas treatment. Specifically art of an ancient Jedi planet/temple that would essentially evolve into Ahch-To in the produced films.Make sure to get your hands on the TFA book, since that still has art from the George Lucas version of 7.
Hey, at least we got Baby Yoda.I'm done with anything Disney. What a trash, empty, creepy company.
Trevorrow stated that the art book (at least what was posted in an article online) didn't contain anything from his cut, right? That makes this weirder. Maybe they'll get rid of some stuff like the (seemingly) actual screenshot of the filmed scene where Kylo approaches the Oracle.
I'm done with anything Disney. What a trash, empty, creepy company.
Yea. Doesn't seem like the OP was made in good faith given the lack of context and title.So much confusion due to this bad OP. And just bad discourse around Star Wars online. The copies being destroyed are early drafts of the book that were accidentally printed
The Art of TROS was delayed last month, from the day of the movie's release to March 2020. It was announced before the movie's release and way before the leaks of the supposed Trevorrow script, which both him and other sources have confirmnever got to the point of having any concept art that made it to the book.
The delay is most likely being done so as to add art and info about the final act of the film, which most Art of books avoid because they are delivered or released the same day as the movie.
ThreadmarkedThe OP is missing all kinds of important information.
The Art of The Rise of Skywalker was scheduled to come out the same day as the movie. A little more than a week before then it was delayed until March. Previous art books in the series had released day and date with the movie but did not include art from the climaxes of the films so as to avoid spoilers. That art was included in the next movie's art book, i.e. art from the end of The Force Awakens was published in The Art of The Last Jedi and art from the end of The Last Jedi is expected to be in The Art of The Rise of Skywalker. It's highly likely that The Art of The Rise of Skywalker was delayed so that it could include pieces from the entire movie. Why it was not originally scheduled to come out later is unknown.
The South Korean version of the art book was released a week ago, for unknown reasons. It is missing art of Palpatine, Exegol, and the end of the film. It is incredibly likely that this is the version of the book originally intended to come out last month. The delay happened late enough that it appears South Korean copies had already been printed. The publisher is recalling them. This recall is only happening in South Korea and there is no additional delay for any other territory.
There's no indication that anything in this erroneously released version will be altered or removed in the official version
Destroying unsold copies is standard operating procedure in the book business.
Don't just threadmark. Edit your OP, the OP is blatantly misleading.
Done and I've also requested a lock. Sorry for the confusion.Don't just threadmark. Edit your OP, the OP is blatantly misleading.