Day one for me.
Thanks for the info. I might wait for Ryzen and then go again, thanks!That's what I run right now. I have a 9600K and a GTX 1080 FTW3. I wanted to be modern and be able to run Battlefield V and The Division 2 on high settings at 1440p. It's excellent for current games.
But I'll be perfectly honest with you, I was wanting the 9700K or the 9900K when I built it. It looks like things are probably going to head to 8-core support in the near future with the next-gen consoles running on cut-down Ryzen 3000s. I'm still planning on getting a 9900K and selling my current cpu. (the newly uncovered vulnerabilities have put a damper on that plan)
It's a double-edged sword. The 9600K is one of the best/cost-effective ways to get current with PC gaming. Alas, it only has six cores. I wouldn't say that it's going to be a problem going forward anytime soon. But you might start to feel the effects of it in a few years. It's def not a bad time to build a PC but I'd wait to see what the Ryzen 3000 processors bring in July, first, before buying new core components right now. If you have to build today then the 9600K for ~$229 is a great choice. All those extra cores don't do a whole lot and Intel is still on top, for gaming purposes.
Wait for the next year cards.Would you guys upgrade from a 1080Ti FTW OC to a EVGA RTX 2080ti FTW3 Ultra for 1k$. I could probably get $500 for my card.
A couple thoughts:Finished my build last night and tried out a couple of games this afternoon, but I'm noticing performance isn't quite what it should be.
The system has an i9 9900k stock with a RTX 2080 and 16GB DDR4 3000mhz, running my games off a Samsung 970 Evo SSD.
Assassin's Creed: Odyssey (one of the main reasons I upgraded from my old crappy processor) is running rather badly. In both the benchmark and ingame, I never hit 100% usage on either my GPU or CPU and if I leave the game at standard 1440p, the framerate is all over the place. If I up it to 4k or even 5k resolution, the CPU usage still stays quite low and the GPU still doesn't hit 100% usage, it just jumps around between 80-95ish. The framerate at 1440p in the centre of Athens jumps around all over the place from around 40-80fps, completely unstable. At 4k it just continues doing the same, but with a smaller window. It's even unstable out in the countryside with nothing around.
Any ideas on why I might not be hitting 100% usage at all?
I've got some other games downloading as we speak to test further.
Next go to your nvidia control panel and click on adjust desktop size and resolution.Set both your monitors to "Perform Scaling on" to your GPU and not the display which is the default.
Temps seem mostly fine. The CPU is sitting on 50-60 and the GPU is between 70-80.A couple thoughts:
- Have you checked CPU and GPU temps during gameplay (MSI Afterburner)? Make sure nothing's getting thermal throttled.
- Are you running a dual monitor setup, with different refresh rates between primary and secondary? (Ex. 144hz + 60hz.) If so, see this thread, particularly this step:
How much of a performance boost is that? Might your budget be better spent towards something else? I asked myself this question since I was considering going from a GTX 1080 -> 2080 ti but for me, the answer was just get a 144hz 1440p monitor instead. As I explained earlier, I have 3 screens connected (TCL 4k TV, 1 1080p monitor, & old monitor). After I get the monitor I'll try to give it a few weeks and think bout my next move. Putting off the video card upgrade because I'm not too impressed with the 2080 ti benchmarks. For over 999.99 I want to be soaring way beyond 4k/60ps on my setup. I already have the intel i9-9900k but I justified that expense for productivityWould you guys upgrade from a 1080Ti FTW OC to a EVGA RTX 2080ti FTW3 Ultra for 1k$. I could probably get $500 for my card.
Turned off Win10 Gaming Mode? Let Windows finish all its updates? Updated SSD firmware, chipset drivers, etc.? Checked your Geforce Experience settings?Temps seem mostly fine. The CPU is sitting on 50-60 and the GPU is between 70-80.
It's just a single 165hz monitor, but I do have scaling turned off because of problems with getting DSR to work properly.
Yep, to all of those. I've updated everything I possibly can and Windows Update ran its course this morning and has nothing else left. Not sure what else to try.Turned off Win10 Gaming Mode? Let Windows finish all its updates? Updated SSD firmware, chipset drivers, etc.? Checked your Geforce Experience settings?
Are you running 2x8GB, DIMMs in the appropriate slots for dual channel, and XMP enabled to get to 3000 speeds?Yep, to all of those. I've updated everything I possibly can and Windows Update ran its course this morning and has nothing else left. Not sure what else to try.
I enabled XMP this morning and verified the speeds in CPU-Z, so that's fine. In terms of the channels, it's a Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro and according to the manual, the first two slots are A1 and A2 and the second two are B1 and B2. So I've got both modules in A1 and A2.Are you running 2x8GB, DIMMs in the appropriate slots for dual channel, and XMP enabled to get to 3000 speeds?
See the "Dual Channel Memory Configurations Table" in the manual. For dual channel, you want to use A1+B1 or A2+B2.I enabled XMP this morning and verified the speeds in CPU-Z, so that's fine. In terms of the channels, it's a Gigabyte Z390 Aorus Pro and according to the manual, the first two slots are A1 and A2 and the second two are B1 and B2. So I've got both modules in A1 and A2.
I've just noticed my SSDs are running kind of hot. The motherboard has the M2 slot right under the graphics card and my Samsung 970 Evo is running at 65 degrees while gaming.
I got banned last week and was bored so decided to do some upgrades lol:
Scored a 9900k for $431 out the door at Fry's
Running at 5.0ghz on a Corsair h100i Pro with cheap Thermaltake TG-7 paste. It's at least 10c cooler than my 7700k was at 4.8ghz
It's more cores if you render video, but that would most likely be a downgrade for games and general usage.That's a great price for the 9900k. I've been considering dumping mine on Ebay to prepare for AMD.
I don't really care what the 3000 series does specifically.. just want to tinker with something different. But hopefully they come thru.
Yep, you're right. I totally misread the manual. Swapped the modules around and got them in A1 and B1 now. Thank you.See the "Dual Channel Memory Configurations Table" in the manual. For dual channel, you want to use A1+B1 or A2+B2.
As for the NVMe temps, I had that same question when I did my first build with an NVMe drive last year (also a 970 EVO). Apparently they're supposed to run pretty warm. Not the temps you're used to with 2.5" SATA SSDs.
Weird, The cpu usage is high of course, but looks like mostly the same settings I use, except I'm in fullscreen mode. Is there a reason you use borderless?Yep, you're right. I totally misread the manual. Swapped the modules around and got them in A1 and B1 now. Thank you.
Performance is still really bad, though. If I turn the graphical settings down turn the resolution down, the framerate still jumps around and hovers around 60. If I turn everything to max and set it to 5k resolution, it jumps around still, albeit 20-40 instead of 20-80.
There's also a crazy amount of stuttering.
You can see here with the benchmarking tool. I was just running around in circles or standing still on the rooftop and the framerate is just constantly going up and down. In the second one, there was insane amounts of stuttering, with the framerate jumping from 20 to 80 to 60 to 20, etc.
I haven't played AC:O, and when I looked up some benchmarks, 60-ish FPS average at 1440p Ultra seems somewhat normal (even with a bleeding edge CPU), but I wouldn't think it should be dipping that low... All I can think is maybe try driver clean & reinstall, or try out some previous driver version.Yep, you're right. I totally misread the manual. Swapped the modules around and got them in A1 and B1 now. Thank you.
Performance is still really bad, though. If I turn the graphical settings down turn the resolution down, the framerate still jumps around and hovers around 60. If I turn everything to max and set it to 5k resolution, it jumps around still, albeit 20-40 instead of 20-80.
There's also a crazy amount of stuttering.
You can see here with the benchmarking tool. I was just running around in circles or standing still on the rooftop and the framerate is just constantly going up and down. In the second one, there was insane amounts of stuttering, with the framerate jumping from 20 to 80 to 60 to 20, etc.
In the first one, the GPU usage was staying low. In the second, it was sitting in the 90s but then everytime it stuttered, the CPU usage would plummet.
I put it in borderless temporarily to more easily see the sensor graphs in Afterburner to check temps and what not. It's normally full screen. When I set the resolution to 4k or 5k, it still doesn't go to 99% usage. just jumps around between 80-96ish.Weird, The cpu usage is high of course, but looks like mostly the same settings I use, except I'm in fullscreen mode. Is there a reason you use borderless?
I have a 2080ti and my GPU utilization swings between like 75-95% depending on what I'm looking at, FWIW. I think if we were playing at 4K it would be pegged at 99%
I haven't played AC:O, and when I looked up some benchmarks, 60-ish FPS average at 1440p Ultra seems somewhat normal (even with a bleeding edge CPU), but I wouldn't think it should be dipping that low... All I can think is maybe try driver clean & reinstall, or try out some previous driver version.
Are other games having the same problem?
It's more cores if you render video, but that would most likely be a downgrade for games and general usage.
Because the person was talking about selling their chip for a Ryzen 3000?I dont understand why you posted that video? Both posters are discussing the Intel i9-9900k. Neither mentions the Radeon 2700X. And we (general public) dont know the specs on the 3000
Because the person was talking about selling their chip for a Ryzen 3000?
We don't know exact specs, but we know software hasn't been optimized for its architecture for like a decade +. That video talks about different ways how the Ryzen is the better value but the Intel is the better experience. (PCI-E lanes, quick sync, gaming, clock speeds, software optimizations, etc.)
They're really not as close to each other as people often make them out to be. They all run the same apps, but it's not the same experience.
Ryzen 3000 can add more cores and make improvements on ipc and speed, but for a variety of things you can safedly assure that it's not going to totally dethrone the architecture that has been dominating the market for years. A 16 core chip getting more points in cinebench doesn't mean it's faster for scrubbing through a video timeline, zipping a file, or gaming.
Yeah I get that. I haven't played with an AMD for over a decade myself. I'm sure it'll be good and for your purposes sounds like it'll work either wayHonestly I don't really care one way or the other. The 3000's will be fine and I want to tinker with something new.
In the meantime I have a delidded 8700k that can drop in to carry the mail just fine.
THat's insane. I paid like $530 at Fry's. Was it just $431 sticker price or what??? -- editI got banned last week and was bored so decided to do some upgrades lol:
Scored a 9900k for $431 out the door at Fry's
Running at 5.0ghz on a Corsair h100i Pro with cheap Thermaltake TG-7 paste. It's at least 10c cooler than my 7700k was at 4.8ghz
Ah you're good then, that's going to play 95% of games as good as their 10-core chips that aren't even out yet
It was on sale for $479 + 10% coupon + I was in Portland so there was no sales tax. Got my RAM there too since it was also a killer deal but 'only' 3200mhz. Wanted to get my board there but they didn't have the high-end Gigabyte ones in-storeTHat's insane. I paid like $530 at Fry's. Was it just $431 sticker price or what??? -- edit
It was on sale for $479 + 10% coupon + I was in Portland so there was no sales tax. Got my RAM there too since it was also a killer deal but 'only' 3200mhz. Wanted to get my board there but they didn't have the high-end Gigabyte ones in-store
I'd wait for benchmarks if it's mostly a gaming PCI have i7 6700(no K) planning to move to ryzen5 3600x it will worth?
it will be enough for next-gen or should i wait for ryzen 4000 series?
Ha, thanks. It was a coupon I got thru their daily deal emails, FWIW. It did like 20% off everything and 10% of high end items like consoles, CPUs/GPUs, etc.
Thanks for this info, I didn't know i could overclock it.I'd wait for benchmarks if it's mostly a gaming PC
It will be better for full-core loads like video renders, but the 6700 still is a pretty fast chip in games. Have you overclocked it? (You can overclock non-K Skylake CPUs depending on what kind of board you have https://overclocking.guide/updated-msi-z170-non-k-overclocking-guide-new-bios/ )
Ha, thanks. It was a coupon I got thru their daily deal emails, FWIW. It did like 20% off everything and 10% of high end items like consoles, CPUs/GPUs, etc.
Yep, you're right. I totally misread the manual. Swapped the modules around and got them in A1 and B1 now. Thank you.
Performance is still really bad, though. If I turn the graphical settings down turn the resolution down, the framerate still jumps around and hovers around 60. If I turn everything to max and set it to 5k resolution, it jumps around still, albeit 20-40 instead of 20-80.
There's also a crazy amount of stuttering.
You can see here with the benchmarking tool. I was just running around in circles or standing still on the rooftop and the framerate is just constantly going up and down. In the second one, there was insane amounts of stuttering, with the framerate jumping from 20 to 80 to 60 to 20, etc.
In the first one, the GPU usage was staying low. In the second, it was sitting in the 90s but then everytime it stuttered, the CPU usage would plummet.
Word?! I wanted to cut down on emails so I unsubbed everyone!! Bad move!!! I cant be losing money like this. Thanks for sharing your wisdom I appreciate itHa, thanks. It was a coupon I got thru their daily deal emails, FWIW. It did like 20% off everything and 10% of high end items like consoles, CPUs/GPUs, etc.
Yeah, I can't get it to get to 100 usage at all.I don't have my 2080 Ti installed right now, but I ran the benchmark with 1080 Ti / 9900K @ 3440x1440. My GPU basically stays nailed up at 100% (roughly). I'm around 60FPS but it's bouncing, and of course settings can be a factor.
yeah welcome aboard. I just built from scratch first time myself early this month (I used to let Fry's install the cpu,cooler, and my motherboard into my case when they did it for free yrs ago).It feels really good to actually set up a pc yourself. I've never knew anything about pc stuff, my friend built my pc for me in 2012. I recently upgraded and got a new case and was gonna have him teach me how to do everything. I seen a couple of videos and decided to do it myself. Its a lot easier than I thought. Missed some stuff but I fixed it before hand. It was pretty fun though. My cable managment sucks Ill fix it eventually.
So, I'm noticing that when the stuttering occurs (particularly bad in AC:O and happens in GTA V too), the CPU is downclocking itself for like a second every time and then the framerate drops or jumps around. Yet, it's not overheating. It's still being cooled and staying around 60 degrees.
I just ran Cinebench with it and it got pegged at 100 usage across all 16 cores, the temp shot up to 90 degrees almost instantly, but didn't throttle or downclock.
Unfortunately, it didn't help. Thanks for the tip, though.Just a hunch but could it be the windows 10 standby memory bug?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/8ks8hm/psa_windows_10_when_the_standby_memory_cache/
Give this a whirl to see if it alleviates the issue.
https://www.wagnardsoft.com/content/intelligent-standby-list-cleaner-v1000-released From the same guy who created DDU.
So, I'm noticing that when the stuttering occurs (particularly bad in AC:O and happens in GTA V too), the CPU is downclocking itself for like a second every time and then the framerate drops or jumps around. Yet, it's not overheating. It's still being cooled and staying around 60 degrees.
I just ran Cinebench with it and it got pegged at 100 usage across all 16 cores, the temp shot up to 90 degrees almost instantly, but didn't throttle or downclock.
How would I go about checking that?Depending on how the CPU is setup it could be current limited, doesn't have to necessarily be a heat thing.
How would I go about checking that?
One thing I just remembered is that there are two power connectors for the CPU on my motherboard, one 2x4 connector and one 2x2. My PSU (Corsair HX850) didn't come with any 2x2 connector cables and so I only have the 2x4 connected. Could that be connected?
I haven't had need for a low-profile cooler, but liked the look of the Noctua NH-L9x65 (also available for AM4). Looks like it fits your case (65mm high with 71mm clearance).I have a Cooler Master Elite 130 (ITX) case and a Corsair H80i which is getting on for 4 years old and having a 120mm fan on 100% is kinda loud.
I am keen to move to a decent low porfile cooler, but what good ones are there? The clearance isn't the best in this case although I could be tempted in to a new case + cooler. PSU is a Corsair AX760i though which I do wanrt to keep.
Apart from enabling XMP, I basically haven't touched any settings in the BIOS.When you setup the CPU you need to decide if MCE is on/off, what type of power restrictions you place on the CPU (if any), etc. The 9900k will pull massive amounts of current if you let it. I think it's doubtful that the other power connector is a factor unless you're really overclocking significantly and don't realize it.
"Stock" settings with Z390 are usually overclocking by default. I had to work to reel mine in.