This is really irritating. I was actually looking forward to many of these games, especially The Outer Worlds, Control and Sinking City. Guess I'll play them next year.
I wouldn't be surprised if the Epic contract prohibits them from selling the game for less than the EGS price for at least a month.
30% is the standard cut for digital storefronts. It's the same cut that Google and Apple take. Valve has done (and is doing) more for PC gaming than any other company so the 30% cut seems pretty reasonable to me. They're certainly more deserving of that cut than the 12% that Epic is taking.
The only way for Valve to "wake up" is to counter-moneyhat. That's literally the only reason why pubs and devs are signing up for EGS timed exclusivity. It has nothing to do with revenue share, curation or discoverability. Epic offers money for exclusivity and pubs/devs take it. It's that simple. If Valve offered publishers and developers millions of dollars to keep their games on Steam, these games would still be on Steam.
The last thing we want is for companies to engage in a moneyhat war that ultimately hurts consumers and undermines the core values of PC gaming.
On a side note, it's odd/refreshing that Unknown Worlds hasn't made Subnautica: Below Zero an EGS exclusive. Surely the offer was made to them, especially considering that Subnautica was one of the first free games used to promote EGS. If that's the case, they deserve props for keeping their integrity and remaining loyal to their fan-base instead of a quick paycheck. I was going to wait until Below Zero left early access before picking it up but I think I'll just buy it now to support them.
My thoughts exactly. Sometimes, this situation feels like every other company involved in the PC gaming space is trying to elbow out Steam for being an inconvenience to how they wish they could run things in the PC space. What happens if Steam is gone, if we don't have a market leader doing the right things and respecting the PC platform's openness?
I realize it sounds stupid but there's too much of a concerted effort in shutting them out, to the point where I wonder if it's even legal.
The double standard some people apply to the 70% cut is also slightly hypocritical. I'm with you if you want a higher percentage, but why aren't people taking Sony, Nintendo and Microsoft to task for taking that exact same cut? Where's the outrage here? It all feels disingenuous, especially in light of the fact you can sell keys directly and get all the moneys with Steam. None of those console manufacturer would ever dream of giving stores and developers that capability.