Ah, OK now it makes sense.I'd say it's more reserved for animals, and without the sexy connotations of 'thicc'.
Ah, OK now it makes sense.I'd say it's more reserved for animals, and without the sexy connotations of 'thicc'.
Naturally, there's a picture of someone fucking with the gigantic shark.Note, when you see a big "chonky" wild animal, don't assume that it is overweight.
In fact, assume that it is actually swole AF and you don't want to fuck with it.
I'll never understand this "scientifically accurate T-Rex is less cool" nonsense.First the feathers and now this smh. This campaign to make them less cool needs to stop.
Somebody call Darwin
Another Vore Thursday on Era I see.It would of course be too late by the time you feel that vibration because T-Rex would be upon you and the last thing you'd feel is searing pain, and then nothing as your spine breaks. The last thing you'd smell is its putrid breath and the last thing you'd see is the darkness of its mouth and then nothing.
Isn't that supposed to be Sue?The hell's he doing with a whole damn hadrosaur? He better be sharing that with the missus, 'cause his fat ass sure don't need that many hadro-burgers!
...them...First the feathers and now this smh. This campaign to make them less cool needs to stop.
That's Sue indeed.Isn't that supposed to be Sue?
Am I wrong? Isn't she the Missus?
Yep. The animals we see in film are not being given reasonable musculature because that stuff isn't preserved. For example, this is a baboon as drawn in the way that we reconstruct dinosaurs using nothing but the skeleton:As has been pointed out many times, the film versions, and previous scientific reconstructions, always just recreated the bare minimum on the bones, as if the animals were starving.
I thought it had a few tufts of fibers here and there, like elephants have a couple small spots with fur?The current scientific consensus is that the T Rex didn't have feathers
Props for talking about the probable vocalization of Rex.
Doesn't mean it is the only sound it was capable of though.
This is celebrating scientific accuracy. This is the image people should have of T-Rex, not the emaciated, genetically engineered monstrosities of the JP films.
Props for talking about the probable vocalization of Rex.
Doesn't mean it is the only sound it was capable of though.
thicc and chonk are two distinct measurements and should not be confused
It should have had wings instead.
That thing doesn't even arms to make fun of, it's all just claw!Everyone makes fun of tyrannosaur arms when they didn't even have the goofiest arm proprotions of the theropods.
That honor goes to the abelisaurids, like Carnotaurus.
Interestingly, Stephen L. Brusatte in his book The Rise and Fall of the Dinosaurs postulated that T-Rex may have hunted in groups and therefore wouldn't need to rely solely on their speed. They could plan ambushes and target specific prey and funnel them towards those lying in wait.Looks like it will tire out after a few seconds running at 25mph.
Props for talking about the probable vocalization of Rex.
Doesn't mean it is the only sound it was capable of though.
Keep in mind that these low frequency vibrations would actually be physically felt at a certain distance
Sue was gendered as a female due to being named after her discoverer Sue Hendrickson. As far as I know, I don't think we know its actual gender, so it's up to anyone really. The Chicago Field Museum has Sue as gender neutral.Isn't that supposed to be Sue?
Am I wrong? Isn't she the Missus?
Oh I didn't know.Sue was gendered as a female due to being named after her discoverer Sue Hendrickson. As far as I know, I don't think we know its actual gender, so it's up to anyone really. The Chicago Field Museum has Sue as gender neutral.
Have you seen Emu wings?