First time I've ever seen proper use of the C word on ERA. Wow.Wow. First we got games ripping arts or works of others without credits and now this. This is so creepy.
First time I've ever seen proper use of the C word on ERA. Wow.Wow. First we got games ripping arts or works of others without credits and now this. This is so creepy.
What happened here????
Talk about society huhThe game industry has more severe problems than this texture or Callisto Protocol's gore that was discussed a few weeks back.
Funny how gamers talk about ethics these days. ;)
I would assume that the permission was given to the supplier of the images, so they just need to be authorized to use it. Or do you think everyone making use of those images through those licenses need be be bothering the family members of that person or any others who ended out that textbook?Maybe technically legally, but I hope they got the direct permission from the family as well. Because whether they have legal rights to use the image or not, I think it's immoral if it doesn't have the family's consent.
If they don't have permission we could be seeing a similar situation than the one that happened with RE4, so if that's the case, we will hear about that lawsuit sooner or later.Just because they took it from a medical textbook doesn't necessarily mean they have the rights to use it for the game.
But only Valve or the book publisher probably know, and I don't know if we'll ever get clarification from them.
I would assume that the permission was given to the supplier of the images, so they just need to be authorized to use it. Or do you think everyone making use of those images through those licenses need be be bothering the family members of that person or any others who ended out that textbook?
This is me too. I never played much of HL2, and now knowing this, it makes me less likely to give a proper shot.I don't really care about where it's from or the legality of it, I'm just of the strange opinion that I don't want actual real life pictures of ftortured dead people in my video games.
It depends how it was licensed. For me, if I give my body to medical science then it's fine for it to be used in a medical textbook. It's not fine for an image of it to be the basis of an enemy in a videogame.If its from a medical textbook and not sourced from some fucked up place online then its creepy, but not unethically so? Like id rather it weren't but im not sure what else can be said.
That's weird, but 🤷♂️
If the problem is people seeking virtual emulation of violence finding, in the most indirect way possible, some semblance of contact to the real thing… that's cute.
Maybe technically legally, but I hope they got the direct permission from the family as well. Because whether they have legal rights to use the image or not, I think it's immoral if it doesn't have the family's consent.
The game industry has more severe problems than this texture or Callisto Protocol's gore that was discussed a few weeks back.
Funny how gamers talk about ethics these days. ;)
I could easily imagine it being the case where modifying/referencing it was supposed to happen, the image got used as a filler reference and then it just got missed and left as is for the final master. Temporary assets becoming not-so-temporary happens in the production of pretty much every video game, and given Half-Life 2s troubled development it all adds up.Overall, I don't exactly find it ethical. They could've at least modified it to further obscure it's origin.
About two weeks ago, someone posted photographs of dead corpses that they said were taken from a medical forensic textbook, including one of a man who had his face burned off with a blowtorch by the Mafia. The images were posted on ...
That is why AI based creations is the future, it could be scary at some point but it will unshackle us from such situations. We have AI based crteaed characters, even now AI based voices so AI based gore could happen too without the need to involve any real person in the future.
That is why AI based creations is the future, it could be scary at some point but it will unshackle us from such situations. We have AI based crteaed characters, even now AI based voices so AI based gore could happen too without the need to involve any real person in the future.
You're kidding, right? Real gore would have to be fed into the model. AI doesn't just make this shit up out of things air.
That would involve dumping a whole lot of actual gore into a database to train one of their 'models'. Sounds diabolical.
You're kidding, right? Real gore would have to be fed into the model. AI doesn't just make this shit up out of things air.
I doubt the family/victim gave consent that a photo of their corpse could be used in a videogame.Why is it so wrong to use a medical text as a source for a corpse exactly?
Yeah, AI has been known to be indiscriminate with and type of nonconsensual pornographic and gruesome images. Some real person being beheaded ending up in an AI composite was possible.
It's such a basic level of human empathy that I'm legitimately shocked at how so many people are handwaving it.
Why is it so wrong to use a medical text as a source for a corpse exactly?
Assuming this is real (I didn't check those images) and that the family of this person didn't give their consent to have their loved one's charred corpse used in a video game, then this is really disgusting.
Valve need to patch this out. It's incredibly disrespectful and strips this person of their dignity.
Also, wtf at all these sort of posts:
Can't believe how many of you seem to lack a fundamental understanding of consent and empathy.
We don't know the circumstances of how the image was licensed to the medical journal. However, it is not a stretch that the family/estate didn't envision that the image would go on to be used in a violent video game many years later where people could virtually reenact the killing if they so chose. There doesn't seem to have been informed consent.
So a non-issue. Case closed.