Voting is still open so its not
Pretty sure it's tied to this tweet/social media campaign.I mean of course 1917 is going to sweep the technical awards.
Is this meant to be the social media managers predictions or? Because this seems a little suspect lol.
Would they even know? Doesn't some third party do all the counting and envelope stuffing?
This is clearly wrong because Joker is going to win 11 awards.
Why is that anyway? Doesn't seem like there would be too much worry about corruption if they handled it themselves and even if there was who really cares.Independent law office counts the votes. Academy finds out when we do
I don't think he should win, but that's way too harsh. 1917 has quality direction, and the "gimmick" enhances the movie.Best Picture goes to Parasite but absolute hack clinging to a gimmick for dear life Sam Mendes takes best director?
Sounds about right, actually...
Why's is Sam Mendes a hack?Best Picture goes to Parasite but absolute hack clinging to a gimmick for dear life Sam Mendes takes best director?
Sounds about right, actually...
The word has lost all meaning
I think you greatly overestimate how many people will see this tweet.If voting is still open, then wouldn't an official Academy tweet of a list of "predictions" potentially skew the voting?
How long before it's taken down and an apology issued? Imagine you were nominated, but you aren't one of their predicted "winners"?
This seems like a very poor idea.
They have 3.4 million followers. It's a very bizarre thing to do.I think you greatly overestimate how many people will see this tweet.
Best Picture goes to Parasite but absolute hack clinging to a gimmick for dear life Sam Mendes takes best director?
Sounds about right, actually...