If they are serious, I would love to see them just to have a quick chuckle.
And it only seems to be further amplified when it's a Nintendo AAA release. The Nintendo fanboy hivemind is real, man. And it hasn't slowed down in 20 Goddamn years.
Oh I'm totally fine. I'm a grown up. I consider stuff like this a fun thing to witness with my morning coffee though.The Metacritic is still above 90. It's one score. Just let it pass by, haha.
7 out 10 is BS and I'm not even a diehard Mario fan
This is hella different from Zelda's 8.8 but that won't stop some people for mindlessly saying that this is a similar situation, and that a good review is just a good review.
From a purely logical stand point it doesn't make sense.
What? I'm just saying that it makes a lot of sense that a late port with relatively few major improvements over the original is going to get a lot more criticism than the original release, beyond differences in reviewer taste.
ERA had people tracking the TLOUII score weeks after release and calculating how many reviews it would take to fall from 95 and freaking out when it did. I'm not sure this is a Nintendo only thing lolAnd it only seems to be further amplified when it's a Nintendo AAA release. The Nintendo fanboy hivemind is real, man. And it hasn't slowed down in 20 Goddamn years.
Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.You realize that this is a different person reviewing the game right?
It's not a Nintendo only thing and it never has been. Anyone thinking so has blinders on.ERA had people tracking the TLOUII score weeks after release and calculating how many reviews it would take to fall from 95 and freaking out when it did. I'm not sure this is a Nintendo only thing lol
addedOne more, mazi
"Super Mario 3D World + Bowser's Fury might include the same game that was on the Wii U but it's also a title that needs to be experienced by everyone who owns a Nintendo Switch."
Console Creatures Recommended
Let's not get dubious here, that is the case with every big fandom and not specific to Nintendo.
Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
7 out 10 is BS and I'm not even a diehard Mario fan
This is hella different from Zelda's 8.8 but that won't stop some people for mindlessly saying that this is a similar situation, and that a good review is just a good review.
From a purely logical stand point it doesn't make sense.
Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
ERA had people tracking the TLOUII score weeks after release and calculating how many reviews it would take to fall from 95 and freaking out when it did. I'm not sure this is a Nintendo only thing lol
Eh, SM3DW was very easy until pretty much few final bonus levels as far as I remember. Then you get hit with the final final level and it's absolutely devilish and possibly the best level in any 3D Mario game. But getting there is a slog through a ton of easy content.
Some of them definitely are later on. Most of them are more about exploring the levels and the challenge is more about finding them than it is a hard challenge to get them. And you do occasionally need a specific power up, but it's always one they give you in that level.
I would say it is about Galaxy level in terms of difficulty if you've played that. Although game structure is quite different.
A review is by nature subjective, calling any review you disagree with attention seeking is bananas dudeSometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
I read the review. It's fine.Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
Ok, that makes sense. So I guess I'm going to have to be the host when I play with my friends that almost certainly won't play as much as I do lol.My understanding is that online is essentially just you connecting to the hosts game as if it was local, all progression is based off, and saved to, the hosts system.
Really weird take.Sometimes it's really a matter of attention seeking, sorry to say that, but a review should not be 100% subjectives on some matters. I read the review and I don't know if everyone that quoted me did the same.
Is it? Game Informer had to issue an explanation after TTYD. Fans were calling for Gerstmann to be fired in 2006. People tried to fucking DDOS Jim Sterling's site after BOTW and he basically quit doing reviews afterwards.
There's weirdos in every fandom, but Nintendo fans take it to an entirely different level with how fiercely loyal and combative they are. And I consider myself a huge fan of the company.
Just because it wasn't explicitly mentioned doesn't mean that pricing didn't play any factor in the reviewer's impressions. People are typically more lenient with their criticism if something is seen as being a particularly good value. The various expressions of disappointment about how the game was not changed from the original read to me as clear implicit criticism on the value of the game.Read my response to your original post. This being a full priced re-release 7+ years later has no bearing on the game's score. It scored a 7 because the reviewer has fundamental issues with 3D World's design, which even bleeds over to his views on Bowser's Fury. Read the review.
How's this?Has anyone found this image without the Nintendo logo? I'd like to use it as a wallpaper. It's gorgeous. But I can't find a logo-less file anywhere.
The WiiU port scam continues.
I'll buy Bowsers Fury separately but not this collection.
They also didn't threaten the lives of the actors involved in one of their biggest games in the same way certain PlayStation fans did towards the cast of TLoU2. You're going down a dumb road here by painting the Nintendo community as somehow worse than the others. This hobby is full of toxicity and it's not exclusive to one fandom.I would say that Naughty Dog and Kojima are probably the only two that came close, yes. But still, they didn't DDOS THE WEBSITES OF THE OUTLETS THAT LOWERED THE METASCORES.
Good Ol IGN providing Outlier Reviews for clicksMetacritic (90)
OpenCritic (89)
Ars Technica (no score):
Eurogamer (recommended):
Kotaku (no score):
Polygon (no score):
The Verge (no score):
Console Creatures (recommended):
God is a Geek (10/10):
Nintendo Life (10/10):
The Sydney Morning Herald (10/10):
VGC (5/5):
Vooks (5/5):
Destructoid (10/10):
VG247 (5/5):
GamesBeat (5/5):
Digitally Downloaded (5/5):
PowerUp! (9.8/10):
Atomix (98/100, review in Spanish):
Areajugones (9.5/10, review in Spanish):
Nintendo Blast (9.5/10, review in Portuguese):
SpazioGames (9.3/10, review in Italian):
Hobby Consolas (93/100, review in Spanish):
Game Informer (9.25/10):
Video Chums (9.2/10):
Multiplayer.it (9.1/10, review in Italian):
Wccftech (9.1/10):
GameSpot (9/10):
My Nintendo News (9/10):
IGN Italia (9/10, review in Italian):
Metro GameCentral (9/10):
Screen Rant (4.5/5):
Stevivor (9/10):
Twinfinite (4.5/5):
Critical Hit (9/10):
Switch Player (4.5/5):
GameMAG (9/10, review in Russian):
Nintendo World Report (9/10):
Gamer.nl (9/10, review in Dutch):
PCMag (4.5/5):
TheGamer (4.5/5):
The Digital Fix (9/10):
TheSixthAxis (9/10):
Eurogamer Italy (9/10, review in Italian):
GamePro Germany (90%):
GamesRadar (4.5/5):
Nintenderos (9/10, review in Spanish):
GAMINGbible (9/10):
Press Start Australia (9/10):
Trusted Reviews (4.5/5):
GameSpew (9/10):
Jeuxvideo.com (18/20, review in French):
Millenium (90/100, review in French):
Gameblog.fr (9/10, review in French):
Everyeye.it (8.8/10, review in Italian):
AusGamers (8.6/10):
Power Unlimited (85/100):
Telegraph (4/5):
Cubed3 (8/10):
COGconnected (80/100):
EGM (4/5):
Daily Mirror (4/5):
Enternity.gr (8/10, review in Greek):
CGMagazine (7/10):
IGN (7/10):
No one is really freaking out about the score though. People commented on it because it's an outlier score for a certified classic - then people commented on the people that commented to tell them to chill down ...even though they were calm for the most part lol. That's just the way it goes in some of these reviews threads, where the reaction to reactions often is stronger than the initial reaction. Xzbit would be proud.Excellent scores and reviews. Bowsers fury seems to be a very nice piece of new content.
Also when a game has like 92 metacritic, freaking out over a 7/10(for which some of the reviewers complaints have validity) is nuts. 7 is a good score, just leave it lmao
Sounds like you're reading something that isn't there. He criticizes s lack of meaningful gameplay changes because he had issues with the game mechanically at its foundation. If the score of 7 was actually based on value (which it isn't, as he explicitly states early on the game + Bowser's Fury is very much packed with content), he would say so.Just because it wasn't explicitly mentioned doesn't mean that pricing didn't play any factor in the reviewer's impressions. People are typically more lenient with their criticism if something is seen as being a particularly good value. The various expressions of disappointment about how the game was not changed from the original read to me as clear implicit criticism on the value of the game.
They also didn't threaten the lives of the actors involved in one of their biggest games in the same way certain PlayStation fans did towards the cast of TLoU2. You're going down a dumb road here by painting the Nintendo community as somehow worse than the others. This hobby is full of toxicity and it's it exclusive to one fandom.
Or this quick photoshop:Has anyone found this image without the Nintendo logo? I'd like to use it as a wallpaper. It's gorgeous. But I can't find a logo-less file anywhere.