Iunno, says so in the OP at least. You'd have to track down a Founder to ask. Apparently there are 26 of them floating around here, somewhere.
They did just recently buy Typhoon Studios. Maybe they'll have something to show at E3.Wondering if Google will be at E3 and if they got a high profile exclusive (3rd Party?) up their sleeves.
Go into a PS5 thread next and port beg and wish for Sony to cancel PS5 and become publisher so you can play Ghost of Tsushima...Hopefully google just kills it and becomes another publisher with their new studios.
Id like to play Gylt too, its to bad
Just FYI, you can get FFXV for half off that at least on pretty much any other system when on sale. Like Amazon has it at a base price of $12.50 new on PS4.Didn't know about this though. That's a good deal, might pick it up.
I actually have it on Xbox already :PJust FYI, you can get FFXV for half off that at least on pretty much any other system when on sale. Like Amazon has it at a base price of $12.50 new on PS4.
Calm down man i was just stating some thoughts. The difference here is Sony actually publishes games. Which is what i said i want google to do. Stadia doesnt have a single 1st party game or timeline of when we might get one. There are multiple other ways to play the same games and better except for Gylt which i said id like to play. Just with a better experience than Stadia offers. Its my preference thats all. If you enjoy stadia that's awesome enjoy it.Go into a PS5 thread next and port beg and wish for Sony to cancel PS5 and become publisher so you can play Ghost of Tsushima...
...
You can soon play Gylt through the free sub. The service should obviously stay, they just needs to fix the economics and game library so it becomes more interesting.
I don't own Stadiouya, and I don't plan on getting it.
It just never looked like something I'd be remotely interesting in using. I don't see the appeal in streaming at all. I like locally rendered games, everything else just feels wrong to me and I have a PC + all the consoles that interest me. I'm still not sure why I would want to buy games on a service and stream them? it seems utterly pointless to me, like a watered down version of the real thing. I have uncapped fiber optic internet, so that's not even a hurdle.
The only reason I haven't forgotten yet is the Omega Cringe ads I still occasionally see on YouTube.Honestly I keep forgetting it exists. Seems like it was more popular when it was just a name and a empty display
I was going to make a virtual boy joke, but i googles and it looked like the VB got almost a year of releases. Unrelated, I miss Hudson SoftIt's the 10th of January and Stadia still doesn't have any games scheduled for release this month.
We're only into month 3 and already the releases have dried up.
I miss them too 😢I was going to make a virtual boy joke, but i googles and it looked like the VB got almost a year of releases. Unrelated, I miss Hudson Soft
Wait, what? Somebody please tell me there's been a misunderstanding here.
Honestly I keep forgetting it exists. Seems like it was more popular when it was just a name and a empty display
I think their only chance for success is finding a market outside of gamers realistically. But the problem is that non-gamers are not going to pay $20-60 for a game. A game to them is maybe $2-3. Or it's free.damn, those poll results.
and this is on a video game enthusiast website, who is even using this?
Yeah, this is why I think PS Now and GamePass/xCloud feel better to me. They're more of an addition to existing services, rather than something totally separate. I'm not required to use xCloud to stream games, I just have the option to do so, if I choose (once it's released lol).It's fine as an option, especially if it can add value to something you're paying for anyway. As the only way to play and with no games that exploit streaming's strengths then yeah, it can feel pretty pointless.
I was told they are adding games all the time.It's the 10th of January and Stadia still doesn't have any games scheduled for release this month.
We're only into month 3 and already the releases have dried up.
It's not in yet. The service is pretty much early access right now and they were foolish not to label it as such.
I was told they are adding games all the time.
Was that inaccurate?
Since I'm a competitive gamer, Stadia is not for me so I definitely won't get it.
Also, even just for gaming it's slacking.
- No messaging/group messaging
- No Party chat/Private chat
- Terrible screenshot/recording functionality
- No built in streaming to their OWN YouTube platform
But the #1 reason is the games. You need games. Simple as that.
They launched WAAAAY too early. Also, apparently some Stadia owners found the app sometimes unlocking on non-pixel phones and then locking again. So from the looks of it, Google is locking other Androids on purpose, which is stupid. Lol
I was told they are adding games all the time.
Was that inaccurate?
I don't get this? The game is great on VR, but it's still good without. Seems like an unnecessary dig.HAHAH have play it in on PSVR, and there no way that game can be payable on the stadia.....
Making my phone make any kind of noise is the opposite of a perk, Google.
Also, they really should have held off until they actually had compelling content for the service.