How did his parents not realize that their son looks identical to their really good friend from high school that brought them together?
How did his parents not realize that their son looks identical to their really good friend from high school that brought them together?
its not even a couple of weeks, its literally 1 week, they spell it out in the movie.Why do people keep saying this? It's such a dumb point. Why would they remember the face of some kid they met decades ago? And you say "really great friend" as if he isn't someone they knew for maybe a couple weeks at most
At least it's nowhere near as fucked up as other movies from the 1980s I could mention, lol. *Cough*RevengeOfTheNerds*Cough*
lol what the fuck
Man I love Mulaney and I know he's exaggerating for the bit, but I'm kind of annoyed by this routine for how often it's brought up in casual conversation by people who've clearly never seen the original movie and take it as fact that the plot of Back to the Future is about a dude who goes back in time so he can fuck his mom.
Kid was giving the cute to zoom in and pan? i think thats on the camera man who forgot
He never throws it away, he rips it up but then the cable gets unplugged so he gets distracted and puts the tornup letter in his pocket.The biggest plot hole is the torn letter that Marty gives to doc.
We're lead to believe that Doc collects the letter that he tore up and threw away and then patched it back together, which is feasible. Unfortunately Marty goes back to that very same moment again and the doc passes out removing his possibility of collecting the letter meaning he would have been killed by gangstas and the space time continum would have massively fucked up.
Damn. Wasn't expecting that so soon.
They knew him for a week. Do you clearly remember the faces of everyone you went to school with? How about everyone you went to summer camp with?How did his parents not realize that their son looks identical to their really good friend from high school that brought them together?
I really don't get why people make such a big deal of that scene.I was waiting to see how long it would take for this to come out.
But they didn't. They named their kid Marty and he introduced himself as Calvin
He told his mother that people call him Marty when she initially guessed that people called him Cal for short. He just went with letting them think Calvin Klein was his name after he asked her why she kept calling him that.
I find it funny that when he says goodbye to his teenage parents, his mom goes "Hey... Marty is a nice name."How did his parents not realize that their son looks identical to their really good friend from high school that brought them together?
How about how everyone walked by and ignored her getting molested.
The biggest plot hole is the torn letter that Marty gives to doc.
We're lead to believe that Doc collects the letter that he tore up and threw away and then patched it back together, which is feasible. Unfortunately Marty goes back to that very same moment again and the doc passes out removing his possibility of collecting the letter meaning he would have been killed by gangstas and the space time continum would have massively fucked up.
Why do people keep saying this? It's such a dumb point. Why would they remember the face of some kid they met decades ago? And you say "really great friend" as if he isn't someone they knew for maybe a couple weeks at most
I do remember that scene and yeah, it does a better job accurately representing the movie.yea, thats kind of the exact opposite of what happens in the movie
he accidentally goes back in time, and his mom inadvertently wants to fuck him
Marc Maron's character in GLOW does a much better job of describing the movie, but i cant find a clip of it
Surely something in their mind will click in the 80s when they see Calvin Klein underwear start showing up in stores, kind of a "where have I heard that name before" moment? They won't completely forget "Calvin", it's not like they were little kids, they were borderline adults at the time.
Also, Back to the Future is a great name because it subverts expectations. Marty has to go back to his own time, which is what everybody else sees as the future.I do remember that scene and yeah, it does a better job accurately representing the movie.
A lot of the stuff Mulaney complains about is explained in the movie, but it's all in good fun if you're familiar with it. Less so when your obnoxious film buff friends won't give it a chance because to them it's the movie where Michael J. Fox tries to get with his mom.
yeah that's how i perceived it. he went from jock to having to wash the car of the nerdy kid he once bullied.
Don't they think his name was Calvin Klein?Why dont they also remember they named their kid after a guy who looked exactly like the kid when he grew up. That always got me
Why dont they also remember they named their kid after a guy who looked exactly like the kid when he grew up. That always got me
If we boycotted and punished every rapist in society where would we get our presidents and movie producers?
Thats kind of where I go with it. Biff and George's relationship did a 180 so now it's George demeaning Biff. On one hand, he totally deserves it, on the other it's still kind of screwed up.George became so OP that he wanted the opportunity to flex on Biff every single weekend in front of his wife to continually assert dominance
He's cordial in public but when he and Biff are alone shit gets really fucked up
Why is Doc the same age 30 years ago? Because he is a time demon trying to steal Marty's soul into the grid dimension.
What's dumb is that article points out it's talking nonsense but kept going.In all seriousness, I've seen a few people criticize BTTF for other things.
https://thedailybanter.com/2015/10/just-how-racist-is-back-to-the-future/
You mean she looked in his underwear while he was unconscious.But they didn't. They named their kid Marty and he introduced himself as Calvin
That's earth speak.
One of Crispin Glover's problems with the film and part of the reason Zemeckis used a fake Glover in the sequel is his problem with the ending.
How focused the ending was on consumerism and being materially rewarded in cosmic ways. It is a movie of its era. It's cartoonish and represents the kind of thing which would happen in a serial. The bully ends up washing your new swanky American muscle car as you kiss your girlfriend.
I mean the chance that all three kids would be born, the exact three kids, all the exact same age is pretty much impossible anyway. I mean you have sex on a different time a different day, means a different sperm reaching mama. These two lived completely different lives. It's best not to think about it :PMy biggest mental issue with the film is understanding how even though everyone else around him changed, the new Marty Mcfly generated from the changes in the timeline still ended up living basically the same life that had him in the same exact mall parking lot with Doc Brown in 1985.
Also what happened to that marty's Memories? Do they overwrite the old marty's Memories when he returns from the the past? Or did past Marty basically end up killing future Marty by erasing all his good child hood memories and only remembering the old timeline bad ones? Or did all the memories merg together??? And when did this memory loss/gain/merg take place, the moment the photos restored itself or when he went back to the future? And why were his brother and sister in the exact same pose and cloths if they had a now different upbringing? Ugh my head hurts now.
My biggest mental issue with the film is understanding how even though everyone else around him changed, the new Marty Mcfly generated from the changes in the timeline still ended up living basically the same life that had him in the same exact mall parking lot with Doc Brown in 1985.
Also what happened to that marty's Memories? Do they overwrite the old marty's Memories when he returns from the the past? Or did past Marty basically end up killing future Marty by erasing all his good child hood memories and only remembering the old timeline bad ones? Or did all the memories merg together??? And when did this memory loss/gain/merg take place, the moment the photos restored itself or when he went back to the future? And why were his brother and sister in the exact same pose and cloths if they had a now different upbringing? Ugh my head hurts now.