Please don't give them any ideas :D MadQB sounds actually quite good.I'm in if they give it a stupid name like the MadQB. (Or at least, I'd fully support their insanity).
Mad Box is just zzzzz.
Please don't give them any ideas :D MadQB sounds actually quite good.I'm in if they give it a stupid name like the MadQB. (Or at least, I'd fully support their insanity).
Mad Box is just zzzzz.
Namco publishes Project Cars.What does Bandai Namco have to do with this? On the IGN video on lower third on the left they credit slightly mad and Namco.
Project Cars 2 was published by them.What does Bandai Namco have to do with this? On the IGN video on lower third on the left they credit slightly mad and Namco.
I'm sure they just share the same name.Ian Bell? You mean THE Ian Bell who is co-creator with David Braben in making ELITE?
Oh, for a second there. I was like is namco backing this console.
I believe that console is currently selling like hot cakes.I don't want a console where the controllers don't work properly.
Yup, it's very annoying that the joycons are affected by minimal interference.
Apparently it's a closed OSIsn't this just a branded PC?
Or is it a closed OS like the ps4/x1/switch?
Haha this is gold. Are we sure that it's not a huge joke or something ? It feels too ridiculous.
The third concept looks much more likely to make it to market.
The cube on one of its edges just doesnt seem practical:
I think the "why would anyone" applies to every single thing shown on that screen.Why would anyone want email notifications on their game console?
Man, that takes up more space then it needs to. it's probably a Micro-ITX board with an intel and an nVidia card. To be honest it might be very capable and cost around $1,000.
I think the "why would anyone" applies to every single thing shown on that screen.
There's no need for the console to tell you what game you're playing, or what you're watching on Netflix. There's even less need for a console to have a touchscreen on it allowing you to change song. What do they expect, people to get up, walk over to their TV, start fumbling around with the touchscreen until they hear a song they like, and then sit back down? It's another one of those things that could only have been designed by someone who has barely used a console and whose experience with games machines has been almost exclusively playing on a device within arm's reach.
I think this is actually the key misunderstanding right the way through the history of consoles. No matter how difficult making and shipping an electronic box might be, it's generally been a relatively easy part of the process of being a platform holder. It's always been much more difficult to provide a level of first party support that comes close to matching the key platform holders, to attract a level of third party support that means a system keeps getting new and worthwhile games, to market and publicise a system properly, and nowadays to maintain a huge back-end services infrastructure.Does this guy realise that the box isn't what makes the console nowadays. The services that run in the back ground cost billions to setup. He's going to over promise and under deliver again.
Yep, for any investor looking to fund further SMS projects this is what they should know.the reality is closer to "if you build it then you're down tens or hundreds of millions of dollars and your work has only just started".
How long until this turns into a Gizmondo/Ouya type story for the ages?