pete doing what he thinks is right even if it's totally out of his league or leads to unintended consequences is a hallmark of the character
I can see JJJ running a story about that boat incident pinning it all on spidey
Have you ever read a Spider-Man comic? His entire life is punctuated by failure.
Of course part of the point of Spider Man early on is that he's a fuck up, but usually the balance is more in favor of him doing good. After Homecoming were JJ to come out and say "spider man is a menace and needs to be stopped" he is absolutely right.
Avengers should lock his ass up.
And Marvel Comics seems to be wanting to introduce new readers to this idea through the Spider-Man comics with a themed Into the Spider-Verse line of collections… and all coming out on November 13th, a month before the movie. Here are the Amazon listings.
Into the Spider-Verse: Spider-Men Paperback – November 13, 2018
Every world has its wall-crawler – and these are some of the most amazing! When Peter Parker, the original Spider-Man, journeys to the Ultimate Universe, he finds himself face-to-face with another Aunt May, a young Gwen Stacy, and an all-new web-slinger – Miles Morales! It's a landmark meeting of the Spider-Men! Elsewhere in the Spider-Verse, venture into the dark world of Spider-Man Noir, and watch as he faces the smoke and mirrors of the magnifi cent Mysterio! But you've never seen anything like SP//dr – or its pilot, Peni Parker! Things take a hammy turn as Peter Porker, Spider-Ham celebrates his 25th birthday -but who invited Doctor Octopus and the Swinester Six? Plus, Spider-Gwen, Spider-Girl and more unite as the Web-Warriors!
I mean... did they though?
Correct my if I'm wrong but I don't recall any Peter/Spider man iteration having peter be so inept and reckless, most of the movie he is constantly destroying peoples property, putting people in great danger, nearly getting a boat full of people killed, crashing a plane into a city.
He also gets handed everything by Stark.
In my opinion the absolute worst spider man movie.
In what world is Classic Peter not perfectly represented by Holland?I mean... they aren't wrong. Saying this is the best interpretation of Peter when he's the least like how he is portrayed in the comics makes it laughable when people say you can't have Miles first becausethatsnothowthecomicsdidit.
I recently watched Spider-Man homecoming, and although I liked the film, I couldn't help thinking, are we really doing this again? This is the 3rd peter Parker within 10 years, but not just a new peter Parker, as in new actor, but literally a different peter Parker, as in the interpretation of peter parker is so different across the 3 franchises of Spider-Man films.
I couldn't help thinking while watching homecoming I wish we had a clean slate so we didn't have to go over this character again.
Am I mad for thinking this?
I mean... did they though?
Correct my if I'm wrong but I don't recall any Peter/Spider man iteration having peter be so inept and reckless, most of the movie he is constantly destroying peoples property, putting people in great danger, nearly getting a boat full of people killed, crashing a plane into a city.
He also gets handed everything by Stark.
In my opinion the absolute worst spider man movie.
Nah cus this is the first time they've nailed both Peter and Spidey. Also, finally getting Sony to hand over Spidey and then doing Miles is such a waste of all the work they had to do to get him in the MCU.
Miguel O'Hara would be easier to do as totally new Spiderman. I mean all he took was the name. He came up and did it his own way
No. But there's room to Miles to eventually show up in the MCU. That's precisely why I'm sort of two minds with his animation film. While it looks great, I think that making him an "alternate universe" Spider-Man is a mistake. My hopes are that when he is introduced in the MCU, he gets an actual personality. Also, I have a feeling that Marvel Comics is going all in with the "Spider-Verse" aspect of the character, and I'm not entirely convinced that's a good idea:
The movie wasn't that interested in the stuff that makes Parker interesting as a character anyway and were happy to rip concepts from miles wholesale so I think it could have gone that way and not much would have changed.
If we going to be cashing in on Black Panther, go in on Nighthawk
Spidey's thing was tgat he was inept and reckless at the very beginning and when it screwed over people he cared about the guilt hit him so hard that he opted to do better.
I like even as a ground ass man he still fucks up, like being homeless and jobless a couple of times. Cause he put being Spiderman a head of every thing.Very early, classic Spider-Man sucked at being a hero. Ultimate Peter Parker sucked at it too. It's because he's been a young adult with tons of experience perpetually for several decades that we don't associate him with being a fuck up now.
Agree to disagree. Most of the movie he's learning about responsibility, learning how to balance his school life and hero life, and in the end he did the right thing. He didn't have any Stark tech when he fought the Vulture in the end.
No. Why?
More longevity out of the character. Do Peter Parker first for a few years, and then whether you kill Peter off or not, you can introduce Miles later and get more mileage (ha) out of the Spider-Man IP. Starting with Miles from the jump never made much sense to me, even if you were just gonna have him stand in for Peter in his storylines.
As a nigga who loves Miles and his story more than most, I've been waiting a long time to see Parker done right on the big screen.
I don't think so really, he learns basically nothing from the horrific boat accident and then proceeds to crash a plane needlessly. It takes the "Peter is a loveable bumbling idiot" to "Peter is absolutely reckless and in different to human life"
The movie turned me into JJ. Clearly that should be a huge focus of the next movie and Peter finally learning caution and prudence. But they pushed it way too far.
I don't think so really, he learns basically nothing from the horrific boat accident and then proceeds to crash a plane needlessly. It takes the "Peter is a loveable bumbling idiot" to "Peter is absolutely reckless and in different to human life"
The movie turned me into JJ. Clearly that should be a huge focus of the next movie and Peter finally learning caution and prudence. But they pushed it way too far.
Uh, Peter didn't crash the plane? Vulture attacked Peter, messed up, and Vulture destroyed the engines. Peter was able to REDIRECT the plane into a empty area. Am I missing something, isn't that what happened in the movie :/?
Is this an elaborate April Fools joke?Peter's actions lead to the play crash, otherwise Vulture would have just flew it off and stole all the goods. There was no need for Peter to get involved in that way. It's not like Vulture had some doomsday plan and was going to crash the plane somewhere and kill people. The plane crash is a result of Peter again meddling where he shouldn't have.
After the boat you'd think Peter would wanna stay clear of such things. Hell let the plane get stolen and then be like "see Tony, I told you" and then whatever. But nah 'I'm Spiderman, better bust up this vacuum seal and fight the vulture on this plane.
otherwise Vulture would have just flew it off and stole all the goods
Peter's actions lead to the play crash, otherwise Vulture would have just flew it off and stole all the goods. There was no need for Peter to get involved in that way. It's not like Vulture had some doomsday plan and was going to crash the plane somewhere and kill people. The plane crash is a result of Peter again meddling where he shouldn't have.
After the boat you'd think Peter would wanna stay clear of such things. Hell let the plane get stolen and then be like "see Tony, I told you" and then whatever. But nah 'I'm Spiderman, better bust up this vacuum seal and fight the vulture on this plane.
then proceeds to crash a plane needlessly. It takes the "Peter is a loveable bumbling idiot" to "Peter is absolutely reckless and in different to human life"
I mean... they aren't wrong. Saying this is the best interpretation of Peter when he's the least like how he is portrayed in the comics makes it laughable when people say you can't have Miles first becausethatsnothowthecomicsdidit.
I'm pretty sure if arc reactors ended up on the black market a lot of deaths would result.
I like the idea of Miles, but boy ain't got no swag or fire
Carrying the mantle comes with certain obligations and expectations
Check the date. It's April fool's day. Only explanation.
Cause "he should've just let Vulture get away and flood the streets with extremely dangerous weapons" cannot be an actual take.
At some point, but there wasn't an immediate danger that Peter needed to fuck with the Plane. If Vulture was going to crash the plane or something sure, but "taking the plane to some warehouse so he can sort through and sell the goods over a period of time" isn't a good reason to get crazy on a plane.
Retrieving stolen good is something that could wait, specially seeing as the last times Peter got involved with these stolen goods his beloved deli got demolished, a boat got cut in half... I mean how many catastrophes have to happen before Peter is smart enough to think "I should wait for Tony" cause I'm probably going to put lives in danger.