http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/walmart-plus-size-clothing-price-1.4796192
An ad for Joe Fresh clothing promoting the fact it charges the same price for regular and plus sizes.
Last edited:
Shoppers angry over Walmart charging more for plus-size clothing
- Thread starter FriskyCanuck
- Start date
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/walmart-plus-size-clothing-price-1.4796192
An ad for Joe Fresh clothing promoting the fact it charges the same price for regular and plus sizes.
This is at least a year old... there was already outrage over it.
it's pretty blatant in fact.
so is going from Sm, to M, to L. And let's not even get into the cost difference between infant clothing, children's clothing, and adult clothing.
it's pretty blatant in fact.
I've always been confused how all sizes are the same price. It's literally more or less production materials.
Well if you aren't going to do it across the board then it looks bad. Think about shoe sizes. You aren't charged more for wearing a size 12 versus a size 9.
...The largest sizes cost more, so yes?
They don't necessarily need to have granular prices at every size for the point above to be true.
Yes you get charged less than XXL etc and pay the normal intended price for your size. I can see the point of it being more expensive and they also put them into two groups so it's not like every shirt has different prices.
Because the cost difference is so small that is doesn't matter.
because the BOM is pretty insignificant to the COGS. On top of that.. when it comes to clothing.. IF all sizes were priced differently, a lot (majority?) of people would by a size smaller.. not only for less money but to make themselves feel better... and ill fitting clothing parading around the streets is not what manufacturers are hoping for.
This is usually the norm everywhere. I know a few people that print shirts. Once you hit the XL sizes it generally will cost another buck or so.
so why don't I get a break buying a M shirt instead of L?
aka your response is bullshit.
I imagine it would be hideously impractical to have to create signage if every single size had its own price point. Two distinct groups is a lot easier than potentially five or more.
I highly doubt it's the amount of fabric. I'm guessing it's the economies of scale, far more people wear sizes S, M and L so it's cheaper to mass produce those. The XL sizes are almost special orders so they cost more.
They're buying in such large quantities wouldn't any difference in cost in fabric be negligible?
Its probably only a cent increase with how Walmart and others buy fabric in volume.
in america... anything up to 2XL is most definitely not a special order. Nor are pants up to 44" waist.
I work in the apparel industry, and guess what? SO much fabric comes from China, and thanks to President Tarriff the price is more unstable than I've ever seen it. It fluctuates daily now, and mostly goes upward.
The factories, who sell to vendors, who sell to retailers... everyone up and down the line is feeling that burn. And now it's breaking through the final line: to the customer.
The factories, who sell to vendors, who sell to retailers... everyone up and down the line is feeling that burn. And now it's breaking through the final line: to the customer.
I wonder if it has to do with the fact that most people fall within the sizes of XS-XL, so they cost roughly the same amount to manufacture at scale, whereas sizes larger than that have smaller markets and thus don't reach the scale where they cost roughly the same
Basically an issue of economies of scale
Last edited:
I was in the US once and checked out a 3XL shirt out of curiosity (first time I'd ever seen one). I'm personally not surprised they charge extra... It's like 4 times as large as an M or S. Prices of fabric are of course still cheap, but then there's shipping/handling/packaging too. A shipment of similar quantities to a smaller size will take up more space. Maybe these things add up.
It depends really. Like you could make 2-3 of the smallest size with the material of 1 of the largest. I do think buckets of prices make more sense.
My response is fine. I'm ok if part of the idea is making a statement.
I think this is more likely. I know when my friends in bands and whatnot would order t-shirts, they tend to only offer limited designs in larger sizes because they know those will sit around for a very long time because they're much more likely to sit around for a long time.
Yeah, if I was a merchant at Walmart, everything would just be marked up to the Plus Size price. Appeases the complaints and it slightly improved the margin on the product. Win/win.
Correct. That's what the spokesperson was trying to explain in the OP.
Correct. That's what the spokesperson was trying to explain in the OP.
Some braindead replies here. Put more than a second of thought into your responses guys, holy shit. Easier to fat shame I guess.
I don't know all of the costs involved with making shirts.
More fabric is just one part. Another factor could be production size, how many S,M,L shirts do they make vs XL and up? Larger quantities may be cheaper to produce and if 2XLs are created in small quantities they may have higher costs from the supplier.
Or who knows, maybe they use 2 sweatshop workers instead of 1 at a time on those shirts.
Or it could be that the industry just knows they can get away with it because the larger sizes used to be specialty items, and as more people are needing to wear these sizes they want to keep the same margins going and give BS excuses.
More fabric is just one part. Another factor could be production size, how many S,M,L shirts do they make vs XL and up? Larger quantities may be cheaper to produce and if 2XLs are created in small quantities they may have higher costs from the supplier.
Or who knows, maybe they use 2 sweatshop workers instead of 1 at a time on those shirts.
Or it could be that the industry just knows they can get away with it because the larger sizes used to be specialty items, and as more people are needing to wear these sizes they want to keep the same margins going and give BS excuses.
Oh fuck off. I'm sorry that you're personally inconvenienced sometimes but I've had to live as a big and tall man since I was 15 years old. This is the norm and I wish I could fucking shop at a Walmart but they don't carry 5X Tall so I have to shop at places like Destination XL and pay $30 or more for one fucking shirt in a tall size.
And don't fucking get me started on shoes and socks and underwear.
I've been big, tall, and overweight for a while. I'm used to paying more for my clothes than other people and I wasn't even aware it was an issue. Going to specialty big and tall stores costs even more than a regular department store's big clothes so I'm not sure where the idea that every size should cost the same comes from. I'd imagine bigger sizes sell fewer pieces and use more material than say, the range from S to XL. But if the outrage leads to lower prices for me then I'll take it
fat shaming does nothing to help overweight people. in fact studies have regularly shown that it only makes the problem worse.
Notdissushitagain this is capitalist pricing policy at it's finest. If there is no difference between s and xl there should be none for xl to XXL. Furthermore the price difference will never be more than microcents on the dollar because that is the actual price difference in terms of fabric and production costs. This is discriminatory and the only reason people go for it is because fat shaming is socially acceptable and they'll use platitudes like more fabric to justify it.
