Jun 11, 2023
1,524
The most shocking revelation for me recently was finding out that Doctor Who was not technically wasn't a children's show. All these years I thought it was within the CBBC block of programming aimed at school kids. It made so much sense to me why the tone was the way it was, why the writing was the way it was etc. I was always so confused why people loved it outside of kids and defended it so much.
 

apocat

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,795
Not exacly a big deal. It doesn't really mean anything, and it makes it a little less daunting for new viewers.

The most shocking revelation for me recently was finding out that Doctor Who was not technically wasn't a children's show. All these years I thought it was within the CBBC block of programming aimed at school kids. It made so much sense to me why the tone was the way it was, why the writing was the way it was etc. I was always so confused why people loved it outside of kids and defended it so much.

Have you actually watched the show? It can be super gruesome at times. It's a family show with a long standing reputation of scaring the younger family members.
 
Jun 11, 2023
1,524
Have you actually watched the show? It can be super gruesome at times. It's a family show with a long standing reputation of scaring the younger family members.
I certainly have, it's kinda unavoidable in the UK. I think because it was promoted occasionally in schools and in old Newsround back in the day is where my confusion started.
 

Kschreck

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,332
Pennsylvania
I certainly have, it's kinda unavoidable in the UK. I think because it was promoted occasionally in schools and in old Newsround back in the day is where my confusion started.

RTD and Moffat had the ability to craft a show that kids can watch and enjoy but adults would also be able to watch and enjoy. They found a great balance between being easy to follow while still having awesome twists and turns and craziness throughout. Not a lot of creators can pull this off. Series 1-6 were some of my all-time favorite tv and I've watched a lot. I do think series 7 and onwards slowly lost quality (with a few exceptions like the amazing Heavent Sent episode) but I also know that Moffat explained that he had taken on way to many projects during the time and had far less time to focus on Doctor Who. Still the show remained mostly entertaining and fun until Chibnall took over. Nearly nothing redeemable about his episodes and I felt bad for the cast because they were all pretty great but the writing didn't do it for me.

Really really really hoping RTD can pull off the same magic as he did back during his first run. Doctor Who clearly is a show with basically unlimited potential with the right team working on the episodes.
 
Jun 5, 2018
3,626
Recently got into the series with the release of the magic the gathering cards around it, currently around season 11 now and I have to say this seems like a pointless arbitrary change to me. When you reboot a series after a decade+ absence it makes sense, but that's not the case here, to me it suggests the tone might shift drastically, and that it's trying to focus more on the new people it wants to attract which I've found in other series to not be that great of a decision.


I'm definitely willing to keep watching, but I need to see what this statement is about for myself, I'd still like to hope old stuff could get the odd reference here and there.
 

Kschreck

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,332
Pennsylvania
Recently got into the series with the release of the magic the gathering cards around it, currently around season 11 now and I have to say this seems like a pointless arbitrary change to me. When you reboot a series after a decade+ absence it makes sense, but that's not the case here, to me it suggests the tone might shift drastically, and that it's trying to focus more on the new people it wants to attract which I've found in other series to not be that great of a decision.


I'm definitely willing to keep watching, but I need to see what this statement is about for myself, I'd still like to hope old stuff could get the odd reference here and there.

Yeah this is kind of where I'm at as well. In my opinion, Doctor Who hasn't really been good for quite a long time now. I didn't care for the Chibnall years at all but even the later Moffat seasons were starting to drop in quality as well. Rebooting the series doesn't feel really necessary but at the same time I can understand why they are doing it. I just hope it doesn't feel like a completely total reboot ignoring the past content as that would be a huge disservice to long time fans. That being said, I don't think they will do that. I mean the Tennant specials alone have a lot of fan service in them. I remain cautiously optimistic. Can't be as bad as the Chibnall years.
 
Jun 5, 2018
3,626
Yeah this is kind of where I'm at as well. In my opinion, Doctor Who hasn't really been good for quite a long time now. I didn't care for the Chibnall years at all but even the later Moffat seasons were starting to drop in quality as well. Rebooting the series doesn't feel really necessary but at the same time I can understand why they are doing it. I just hope it doesn't feel like a completely total reboot ignoring the past content as that would be a huge disservice to long time fans. That being said, I don't think they will do that. I mean the Tennant specials alone have a lot of fan service in them. I remain cautiously optimistic. Can't be as bad as the Chibnall years.
Having been binging the series I have an interesting insight I imagine, I definitely have favouritism for everything up to pond leaving, though the episode(s) leading to the 11th dr regenerating into the 12th definitely left a mark.


I do think it's a very subjective thing though, the tone does shift throughout the series, and it's not hard to imagine people could fall off during those transitions.
 

liquidtmd

Avenger
Oct 28, 2017
6,410
'a clutching of anoraks' 😂

RTD is a kinda great / kinda annoying thing - he's a massive troll to people who care deeply about the show, whilst being at the same time someone who cares deeply at the show.

Specifically in the last two months in the PR for the 60th stuff he's deliberately winds the more hardcore fans up with super convoluted and intricate cuts and then turns to say to the wider audience 'woah there, why do geeks have to obsess so much over this'?

I get it's sarcasm and self depreciation somewhat, but it's a fine line between gentle poking and snide trolling
 

SpoonSpatula

Member
Oct 27, 2017
714
New Who, Too.

Looking forward to the upcoming specials and new season. I still need to catch up on the Capaldi and Whittaker seasons (I think I only watched the first two episodes of each).
 

Shopolic

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
7,528
Last seasons were so bad compared to previous ones in my opinion and I watched them hardly. But somehow I think new season will be great and have a good feeling about it.
I wish we could have a more mature/darker Doctor Who series. I like this series (specially Peter Capaldi era) and I know that sometimes there are dark episodes, but overall it's too childish.
 

mclem

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,053
RTD is a kinda great / kinda annoying thing - he's a massive troll to people who care deeply about the show, whilst being at the same time someone who cares deeply at the show.
The *real* meaning of 'Toclafane', anyone?

Edit: Actually, that may be apocryphal? I can't find anything with much provenance confirming what I remember reading ages ago.
 

Aprikurt

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 29, 2017
19,210
It's amusing that there are people legitimately upset by this. It's not like they're going to stop referencing older series or including characters/enemies from the past.
 

plagiarize

Khive rise up
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
28,931
Cape Cod, MA
Makes sense and I don't think fans will get confused because we already break the show up by Doctor or showrunner. The New New Who joke actually works really well if you apply it to different show runners in the classic era too.

I mean, you can't tell me that Bidmead coming in isn't a bigger shift than when Moffat or Chibnall came in.

Also technically, the reason the production codes etc changed in 2004 was because it was being made by a new studio. And that has happened again here. You've got the BBC era. The BBC Wales era. Now the Badwolf Productions era.
 

The Unsent

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,630
The most shocking revelation for me recently was finding out that Doctor Who was not technically wasn't a children's show. All these years I thought it was within the CBBC block of programming aimed at school kids. It made so much sense to me why the tone was the way it was, why the writing was the way it was etc. I was always so confused why people loved it outside of kids and defended it so much.
It's a family show, but there isn't really a specific tone, it changes on who is the writer.

Also I find that last part of your post a bit passive aggressive if you you haven't watched it "people loved it outside of kids and defended it so much."
 
Nov 1, 2017
923
As long as he doesn't let them film first drafts like Chibnall did, I don't really care one way or the other what season number he calls.
 

Aprikurt

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 29, 2017
19,210
The most shocking revelation for me recently was finding out that Doctor Who was not technically wasn't a children's show. All these years I thought it was within the CBBC block of programming aimed at school kids. It made so much sense to me why the tone was the way it was, why the writing was the way it was etc. I was always so confused why people loved it outside of kids and defended it so much.
I mean look at how people respond to Star Wars, a property that is demonstrably intended for a mass audience, particularly children, but has people in absolute uproar every time they make a decision that isn't well received.

Doctor Who fans aren't quite as rabid, but they still get their back up about... Pretty much any major or not major change. Similar cries of "WOKE" when they cast a female Doctor for instance
the performatively outraged are out in force on youtube as usual
I can see the 40 minute opinion pieces now "RTD ERASING Doctor Who's history with new WOKE SERIES REBOOT?!"
 

Guppeth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,115
Sheffield, UK
Do they call it Doctor Whoke? If not, I'm claiming it now. Chuds, you can use it, but you have to pay me. And I don't accept fucking crypto.
 

lunarworks

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,768
Toronto
This will be great for new viewers as the show enters a new and different era. There's clearly been big shifts in both production and direction and so labeling this as a new era does seem legitimately more than just marketing. It also simplifies how the show will be listed on disney plus. I welcome this decision. RTD is really going for it with this, I imagine it will recapture a lot of lapsed fans and find some new ones.

Can nerds start calling the eras of Doctor who Showa (Classic), Heisei (Wilderness), Millenium (Revival) and Reiwa (RTD2) now? Is that allowed? Is the fourteenth doctor the Shin Doctor? Let me have this okay
JOv7e5o.gif
It's the Charles III Doctor Who.
 

Mivey

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,221
Might follow the the new series then. Old Who lost me pretty hard a couple years ago.
 
Feb 15, 2023
4,313
As long as it's not full over over-bearing speeches and awful over-bearing music I might be in.

I only really enjoyed the Matt Smith stuff as it got a bit weird. All the rest I kind of checked out on.

I remember being disappointed in the 2005 series, with big CGI wasps. Just felt duff. It's always better when they don't play pretend Hollywood with 1/4th the budget. Christ I even remember an Event Horizon episode. Who's always better with a bit of grit and Wyndham-esque oddball stuff.

Hell I remember the space vampires, and that weird robot that zipped about in a quarry. Get fucking freaky with it.

#bringbackthequarries


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dI3BIrpxu5k

PUKING CYBERMEN. That's what it's about.
 

acheron_xl

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,584
MSN, WI
This reminds me of comics throwing out years of numbering continuity for the hot sales hit of an issue #1. I hate it there and I hate it here.
 

Trike

One Winged Slayer
The Fallen
Nov 6, 2017
2,429
Honestly, it doesn't really matter to me. The show's canon stretches 60 years and multiple mediums. They're trying to get a new audience/bring back those who used to watch it but fell off. Feeling like you're getting in on a new start rather than tuning in on the 15th season is a lot less daunting.

Dress up the new series/season however you like, I'm just hoping all of these collective changes actually end up benefitting Doctor Who. Maybe one run will have a smooth production.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
74,237
You can of course claim it's a British show so this shouldn't matter... but in the US the 05 series run is staying on Max... imagine Disney Plus launching this already clearly new Who era with it being listed as series 14... lol
 

Wrexis

Member
Nov 4, 2017
25,306
Honestly, it doesn't really matter to me. The show's canon stretches 60 years and multiple mediums. They're trying to get a new audience/bring back those who used to watch it but fell off. Feeling like you're getting in on a new start rather than tuning in on the 15th season is a lot less daunting.

This. Imagine in 2005 the new Doctor Who was introduced as Season 27.
 

PlanetSmasher

The Abominable Showman
Member
Oct 25, 2017
125,089
You can of course claim it's a British show so this shouldn't matter... but in the US the 05 series run is staying on Max... imagine Disney Plus launching this already clearly new Who era with it being listed as series 14... lol

Yeah, I think this is mostly a Disney mandate that Davies is just being cheeky and going along with because he knows it winds people up.
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
12,052
It's just a name, whatever.

Though I would expect this to be a proper fresh reboot if its gonna do this and not just a standard series to series continuation.

Like if you call is season 1 then someone should be able to just jump in. Which I would be surprised if that's the case but we will see.

Which is not to say that you can't reference older series or have plots from them or anything but like... it needs to a first series.
 

Guppeth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,115
Sheffield, UK
Like if you call is season 1 then someone should be able to just jump in. Which I would be surprised if that's the case but we will see.

I think every new Doctor has been a fine jump-in point. They explain who and what the Doctor is, and what the TARDIS is, every time. And you don't really need to know any more than that to enjoy Doctor Who. The show has an extremely low barrier to entry.
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
12,052
I think every new Doctor has been a fine jump-in point. They explain who and what the Doctor is, and what the TARDIS is, every time. And you don't really need to know any more than that to enjoy Doctor Who. The show has an extremely low barrier to entry.

Yeah but season 1 implies a but more of a full reboot.

Like you genuienly do not need to watch a single thing from old who to jump into 2005.
 

Guppeth

Member
Oct 25, 2017
17,115
Sheffield, UK
Yeah but season 1 implies a but more of a full reboot.

Like you genuienly do not need to watch a single thing from old who to jump into 2005.

The numbering is just a marketing thing, for Disney. I really think every Doctor is a reboot, not just 2005, and especially when they change the companions at the same time.

And it's happening straight after the specials, which might be impenetrable to people who didn't watch Tennant's episodes and know how they concluded. A terrible place to jump in, immediately followed by a great place to jump in.
 

OneTrueJack

Member
Aug 30, 2020
5,264
So season 1, eh? I think the reason it feels weird is because the upcoming era seems like a much more direct continuation of the current show than Rose did to either the TV movie or Survival.

There's no big gap from Power of the Doctor to sort of justify the reset. It just feels like the next series. I imagine it's more or a legal/technical thing anyway. The show is now being produced at Bad Wolf Studios, so a new production means a new series order. It is, technically, their season 1.

Nevertheless, it seems like we really are entering a whole new era for Doctor Who.

Classic (1963-1989)
Wilderness (1989-2005)
Revival (2005-2022)
Modern/Bad Wolf (2022-????)
 

The Unsent

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,630
I think every new Doctor has been a fine jump-in point. They explain who and what the Doctor is, and what the TARDIS is, every time. And you don't really need to know any more than that to enjoy Doctor Who. The show has an extremely low barrier to entry.
I don't think the 12th Doctor's was, I think it was a bit of tedious intro and meta alluding to whether Clara can see the Doctor despite their aged visage. You kind of have to already know Clara and the Doctor's pre-relationship before starting that era.