-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Rumored specs for NVIDIA's upcoming "Ampere" RTX 3000 series graphics cards (RTX 3060, RTX 3070, RTX 3080 and RTX 3090)
- Thread starter Deleted member 3812
- Start date
- Rumor
- Status
How did you come to this conclusion?
If it's something like comparing core counts, it's meaninglesss when not within the same gen.
A 1070 has 1920 CUDA cores for ex and is slightly faster than a 980 Ti with its 2816 cores.
edit: didn't even see that what's the source says
Still calling doubt on those...
Last edited:
I hope these are true. This would definitely be quite a bump after the stagnation we have seen in the last couple generations. The only worrying thing is that I can't really see how AMD can compete with this, performance-wise.
Me too, looking forward to moving on from 980ti.
20 series cards were really underwhelming. Looking forward to some serious gains this time... hopefully.
i dont think they can. At least not with highest end flagship gpus and its sad really , since nvidia can price whatever the fuck they want and i will be willing to pay for it
On the other hand, It also looks like the mid range and entry level GPUs will be also be quite strong and hopefully there's going to be price wars happening there. AMD ray tracing is still a mystery though and they probably can barely match current 20xx RTX.
Day one for 3080 if it's $700. I'm missing out the DLSS and RT tech with current 1080 Ti. Can't be bothered about the 3080 Ti, it's crazy to spend $1300 on a graphic card during these period. And yes, 2080 Ti is really selling $1300 here
i think it is the titan. something is really off about these specs.
It's trying it's hardest to run recently released games, but it's definitely time for us 970 folks to move on. What an awesome card that was.
That's my line of thinking aswell...
Buti really, really don't want to be pissed that i bought a 3080 if the ti launches a few weeks later and destroys the 3080.
Maybe i have to be strong and wait a bit longer. The 3080ti looks awesome.
AMD rumours seem to sorta match what they actually show, with NVIDIA it's worse lol
I think the ti will release about a year or so after the 3080. So It may be a bit of a wait.
I'm in the same boat.
I skipped the last line, but I'm ready to go all in as long as the Ti is 1200-1500 and not 2k+
For real! Nintendo keeps screwing us with their old ass technology. And thank you for the duct tape measurements!
Thank you for checking my math!
If we switched to using... uh... the Switch, I suspect we'd have very limited adoption. I bet it would be like trying to get the US to use the metric system. People are just gonna keep using the GameCube because it's what they know.
:D
Same!
On a more on topic note, I've been pretty happy with my 1080ti. I'll probably stick with it and reevaluate when the 40xx series unless I come across something that doesn't run well at 2k60 with acceptable settings on my rig. This card has been really, really good to me.
The Switch is literally listed as 1 Teraflop though, which not only makes it way more up to date, it makes it ridiculously simple to remember, and use for generic comparisons.
Oh, I agree! It would be a far simpler measure... just like the metric system, lol. Now I ask you, sir, where's the comedy in that?
I've been using my launch 1080 through the 20xx generation specifically hoping the 30xx cards get a big boost in performance.
I really hope this is accurate cause if it is then I'm in on a 3080ti as soon as possible lol
I really hope this is accurate cause if it is then I'm in on a 3080ti as soon as possible lol
I'm going to have to make sure my heart is in a healthy state before I even think about looking at the prices lol.
Interesting that Nvidia for the TI goes the way of more cores at a lower clock speed while the standard 3080 has less cores but higher frequency.
???
Wasn't the 10 series considered an outlier in performance gains for the cost within two years? The only stagnation I've seen is with the 20 series, but not because it didn't add anything new, but rather the rasterization power leap was paltry compared to not just the previous gens, but especially compared to the 10 series.
There is also bit delusion going with what kind gen to gen improvements people expect, I imagine.
Some hold with two hands to belief that gen to gen needs to be at least 40-50% gain or it's trash.
Don't forget about architecture improvements / node shrink that result in more performance per shader core. And on top of that, I'd guess more RT cores means less performance impact with raytracing, which could act as an extra little performance increase multiplier in those types of loads. So if a game runs at 100 fps on a 2080, cut down 50% to 50 fps with RT, and a 3080 at 130 fps (30% higher traditional performance) gets cut down 40% to 78 fps, then the 3080 would be ~56% stronger with RT involved.
Unsure how realistic it is to reduce the performance hit of RT by that much though, but the traditional performance increase will probably be higher anyway.
Last edited:
Wut??
It isnt. It has a max performance of 396GFlops FP32 in docked mode.
The Tegra X1 has a max performance of 1TFlop FP16 , which Nvidia used for marketing but is extremely misleading as FP16 is used nearly exclusively for machine learning and AI activites.
Well thats good to know as i intend to use this for 2 years at least
Those ~2000mhz boots clocks likely mean 2200-2300 "actual" boost clocks if 20x0 series is anything to go by.
All I know is LG better have the firmware for 4K 120Hz on the 9 series available as soon as these 3000 series card become available. No bullshitting.
TBH I wish they all had more RT cores. 3080 only has a little more than double a 2080ti (which has terrible rt performance).
256 sounds closer to the 500 I want. They're going to drip feed the RT cores. Maybe by the time the 5000 series is out we'll have the 500+ rt cores for a good framerate with ultra raytracing (which won't even be that ultra - we're not getting minecraft level rtx in cyberpunk or anything like that till next next gen, or after that).
But if the consoles aren't going to have that great rt till like the midgen refresh then it won't matter much anyway I guess.
Disable and move on. Just need intel to put up a serious cpu so I can keep 200+ fps next gen at 1080p. That's what really matters. I can't go back to 100fps competitive first person shooters. It's a different, slower, clunkier feel that just isn't right for competitive. It's fine when you haven't played at 200 for a while but when you do, it sucks ass going back.
256 sounds closer to the 500 I want. They're going to drip feed the RT cores. Maybe by the time the 5000 series is out we'll have the 500+ rt cores for a good framerate with ultra raytracing (which won't even be that ultra - we're not getting minecraft level rtx in cyberpunk or anything like that till next next gen, or after that).
But if the consoles aren't going to have that great rt till like the midgen refresh then it won't matter much anyway I guess.
Disable and move on. Just need intel to put up a serious cpu so I can keep 200+ fps next gen at 1080p. That's what really matters. I can't go back to 100fps competitive first person shooters. It's a different, slower, clunkier feel that just isn't right for competitive. It's fine when you haven't played at 200 for a while but when you do, it sucks ass going back.
Last edited:
earliest estimate seem to indicate a September launch for the RTX 3080. If the TI version comes out in Q4, then it's going to be November or December. The game comes out in September. I think if you can afford the higher end version, you should wait. That's what I am doing. I doubt Cyberpunk will run poorly on RTX 2080 ti especially with DLSS 2.0.
- Status