What card do you have sapphire? Reference? I've had a rx 480, and then upgraded to Radeon 7. outside of making custom profiles that sometimes need to be tweaked have not had any issues.
I have a PowerColor Red Dragon Vega 56 - the same model that GN Steve used to get his RTX 2070 matching results OC'd. I run mine at 1650/975, tested and stable. *I* haven't had the issues with 19.12.2 and beyond, but that's because I've been on 19.12.1 and haven't budged yet. However, I got replies to my PC review for Dragon Quest Builders 2 that it wasn't working for them on AMD GPUs, and its a known issue on both the game's Steam Community Forum as well as on r/AMD.
The Navi 1080p issues have been a consistent point of contention since launch on r/AMD, too.
I wish this would be able to contend against high end Ampere so that there could be a price war... But Ampere is just going to crush this. Jensen is probably giddy with excitement for the opportunity to announce Ampere as soon as AMD makes a press release for Big Navi.
I wouldn't be sad if AMD didn't price it at $1200 US dollars.The 2080 Ti released over a year ago and, if this is true, it's honestly pretty sad if it's only 15% better. The 3000 series will probably be out soon after this drops.
Make AMD Great Again Navi.If true I dont think big Navi does it justice, it should be called MASSIVE or HUGE Navi
17% faster than a 2080 Ti at $800 would be game changing. Absolutely game changing.
It'll competing against the next line of Nvidia cards, sure if they get this out before they can price it higher but after Ampere is out this would most likely battle against 3070-3080 so priced accordinglySome of you people... It's okay if Nvidia sells their card for over 1000$, but AMD should sell one with over 15% more performance for 200$ less. What.
But you'd feel good buying a 2080Ti at $1300?Where did I indicate that the 2080 Ti is below $400? If AMD releases this card at $400, they'd mop the floor up but they won't.
If this is supposed to be big Navi and the 5700 XT is already around $350, I doubt they are going to price this at any point where I'd feel good buying this.
Except 2080 Ti is over 750mm^2. Ampere equivalent most likely won't be viable on 7nm. Big Navi is mostly likely 3080 contender instead.Beating a two year old NV top range GPU by 15% won't be enough to compete in high end when NV will launch its new lineup.
Nvidia selling for those prices was ridiculous and should never be defended. But AMD needs to realize they will be competing with the 3000 series here (likely the 3080 at this performance) so pricing in line with the 2080 Ti would be a big mistake. $800 would be about right if they release before Nvidia, and they might need to price cut once the 3080 is launched.Some of you people... It's okay if Nvidia sells their card for over 1000$, but AMD should sell one with over 15% more performance for 200$ less. What.
But you'd feel good buying a 2080Ti at $1300?
I don't get it, if they release a card that is, say, 15% faster than a 2080Ti at, say $799, that wouldn't be a whole lot better than what Nvidia offers at the moment?
If put like this, yeah. I love AMD but ampere will crucify Navi, there is no way for AMD to release a GPU that won't be stomped by a 7nm Nvidia chip. Big unless: Nvidia is like Intel and can't get their node down if their life depended on it.If big navi wasn't better than a 2 year old gpu on a larger node, I'd be worried
If put like this, yeah. I love AMD but ampere will crucify Navi, there is no way for AMD to release a GPU that won't be stomped by a 7nm Nvidia chip. Big unless: Nvidia is like Intel and can't get their node down if their life depended on it.
But why? Going by past releases, Nvidia will have 2-3 cards faster than the 2080Ti. (The 2080 kinda broke this trend but introduced RTX) We're talking this Navi card being 3070 or 3080 range here. The 3080 would likely be in the same price range you're describing as well. Meaning there will be 2 or 3 Nvidia cards above AMDs best. Again... It changes nothing. Again...17% faster than a 2080 Ti at $800 would be game changing. Absolutely game changing.
No, its not.Who actually believes that 50% increase though... it's fairytale land.
17% more than a 2080ti and priced accordingly is a beast. The ampree ti is not going to be 50% faster.
One person said they should price it at $350-$400. How is that even possible if the RX 5700XT was $399 and was competing with the 2060 Super and 2070 Super at the time?Some of you people... It's okay if Nvidia sells their card for over 1000$, but AMD should sell one with over 15% more performance for 200$ less. What.
One person said they should price it at $350-$400. How is that even possible if the RX 5700XT was $399 and was competing with the 2060 Super and 2070 Super at the time?
Where did I indicate that the 2080 Ti is below $400? If AMD releases this card at $400, they'd mop the floor up but they won't.
If this is supposed to be big Navi and the 5700 XT is already around $350, I doubt they are going to price this at any point where I'd feel good buying this.
Videocardz.com speculates this was maybe an external GPU, or something unknown that messed with results.
Makes sense but I'm wondering if Microsoft did cancel Lockhart last minute could AMD buy the existing silicon stock for use in mobile platforms?Videocardz.com speculates this was maybe an external GPU, or something unknown that messed with results.
I'd love for this to be true.
And those laughing or locking this need to realize that we need competition.
I don't give a damn if Nvidia is best when you're paying double the competition price.
I have 2 Nvidia cards and that could change with this type of performance.
Makes sense but I'm wondering if Microsoft did cancel Lockhart last minute could AMD buy the existing silicon stock for use in mobile platforms?
ahhhh that would make sense, with the mobile CPUVideocardz.com speculates this was maybe an external GPU, or something unknown that messed with results.
The problem is that 2080ti + 15% isn't really adequate competition at the high end. It'll likely leave AMD where they are right now with their highest end card trading blows with Nvidia's XX80 equivalent for $700ish.
It is if it's a mobile card as the identifiers indicate. Or even if it's an eGPU (dGPU in an external enclosure) connected to the mobile APU. With eGPUs you can expect anywhere from 20-50% performance drop just from using the enclosure instead of having the GPU connected through PCI.The problem is that 2080ti + 15% isn't really adequate competition at the high end. It'll likely leave AMD where they are right now with their highest end card trading blows with Nvidia's XX80 equivalent for $700ish.
I thought the current rumor was that Lockhart isn't cancelled? Did something change?
17% faster than a 2080 Ti at $800 would be game changing. Absolutely game changing.
It's too damn funny you arguing about how a card that is supposively 15% faster and priced at $750 or $800 is shit when we don't know what the price of the 3800ti will be. We also don't know what the price will drop on the 2080ti and that thing launched at $1,199 didn't it? $750 to $800 isn't bad for a card that is 15% faster but obviosly you disagree.Please point to where I said "they should price it at $400"
Please re-read what I wrote instead of trying to say they should release it at $400 lol. I had posed a ridiculous hypothesis that absolutely won't happen. Them selling this at even $750 or $800 is shit when the 3000 series is out so soon.
Continue trying to argue that this is supposed to be a win for AMD lmao
Can't wait for NVIDIA to price the 3080 Ti at $1500 because AMD can't get their shit together.
The next time an AMD GPU leak actually pans out will be the first time. But it would be a great time for that to happen lol
I remember a bunch of small leaks the past few months which panned out. Benchmarks which foreshadows 5500 and 5600 etc. People just rarely talk about those.The next time an AMD GPU leak actually pans out will be the first time. But it would be a great time for that to happen lol