Amazing Spider-Man 3 special edition PS5.
Amazing Spider-Man 3 special edition PS5.
Console Warriors can't see anything outside of their petty internet fights.And the problem is that it seems that's what people actually want :/ rooting for more acquisitions, we'll have fewer independent publishers. I hate talking about acquisitions, but it seems Sony will need to purchase a couple of very strategic pubs like Capcom and Take Two/Bandai Namco.
You're making too much sense. If you ask some if these folks, hyperbole I'd all you'll get.
In the real world, it's far less pessimistic than that, but pub acquisitions suck either way.
It's fucking weird....Sony has always been the underdog
I agree with most of this, but I'd add one additional example of a system buyer.The question is if the industry has room for two Nintendos.
The Sony strategy on the PS4 and now PS5 already has a lot of commonality with Nintendo. Both companies dumped all their resources into a single bankable console. Both companies focus on moving that console with their own homegrown talent. Both have deprioritized ecosystem and infrastructure. Both have found a great deal of success with their own customer base.
Xbox tried to compete on these terms before they decided to upend the tea table. They introduced families of systems. They started making aggressive talent acquisitions. They have prioritized ecosystems and infrastructure. While Sony and Nintendo found success by keeping things lean and narrow, Xbox is going to start raking in the revenue by going far broader than we're seeing from their rivals.
So if Microsoft's acquisition and ecosystem strategy creates an environment where people play more and more games on Xbox and subscribe to more and more Microsoft services this sort of reduces Sony to a bit of a boutique experience like Nintendo where the real motivator for buying a PlayStation will be to play their unique exclusive games. But this places a lot of responsibility on them to maintain their quality and consistency. As we saw with the Wii U, you own your failures and go down with the ship.
I've always believed people buy consoles for two reasons:
1) To play the most amount of games possible.
2) To play the games they want to play the most.
These are not mutually exclusive motivators. Sometimes both motivators are satisfied with a single console. But what we have historically seen is people buying either an Xbox or a PlayStation (the most amount of games) and a Switch as a secondary (the games they want to play most). They use their Xbox or PlayStation as their primary gaming console and keep their Nintendo console for Zelda, Smash Bros, Mario Kart, etc. This sort of tongue in cheek console alliance has been a thing since the "Wii60" days. I think it's still a thing now. Lots of console players (and PC players) keep a Switch as their secondary unit.
If Xbox's aggressive acquisition structure produces an environment where they satisfy "the most amount of games" by default and people start buying Xboxes to satisfy their first criteria, will they still buy PlayStations for the games they can only get there? If they do, will this bump Nintendo sales down the line as people can't justify the cost of every machine? Or will people decide Xbox gives comparable enough experiences that they still stick with Nintendo and never pick up a PlayStation? Will PlayStation have to produce less expensive consoles to serve the market as a supplemental machine?
I'm really only describing a certain type of consumer here. Many consumers don't fit this bill. But we all know many do. You just have to wonder what the landscape will look like next generation. Maybe we'll look back on all the dramatics and say "wow, hardly anything changed and we all look so stupid." But I do think the players will move around and PlayStation may have to do something to diversify its revenue and grow its ecosystem if it wants to keep competing with Microsoft specifically rather than "do its own thing."
It's not just that. It's arguably one of the big salvos amongst the tech giants to buy/create their own (yuck) metaverse.The interesting thing is that it's happening now when MS with their infinite money chest could have done this at any time, but never did for some reason.
Seems Phil Spencer managed to convince the MS top brass that it makes sense to invest in Gaming in a real big way – which is something that his predecessors never managed. Instead, gaming seemed to have been in a perpetual on/off-cycle within MS since the 1990s: they would invest in something only to shut it down after a few years ago and so on. Evidently, this has changed. Might also have to do with Ballmer and Gates no longer being around; afaik they never saw gaming as being a core business of MS.
I am fairly confident rhat not a single third-party on GP would partner with Microsoft with this, like when Forza was taken down from the Geforce Now.To be fair, Microsoft are competing with the tech giants, not Sony. I'm fairly confident Microsoft would partner with Sony if it meant Game Pass was on PlayStation.
The biggest concern with Sony is their focus on the retail model. Spartacus is coming, but it doesn't seem to be providing day one access to 1st party titles.
2.2TSony is just not as big as MS. MS is a 1T dollar company. You really can't expect them to just go on a buying spree.
The biggest concern with Sony is their focus on the retail model. Spartacus is coming, but it doesn't seem to be providing day one access to 1st party titles.
The retail model will continue to become challenged over time.
Think 5. 10, 15 years in the future.
I hope so. If they want to compete with Game Pass, they need Day 1 Sony games on it.If any thing this may change Sonys mind about day 1 first party games on Spartacus on the me premium version
Don't hate me, but I think Amazon might buy Sony within like 3 years.
Now THAT would generate some threadsDon't hate me, but I think Amazon might buy Sony within like 3 years.
You have to be in serious denial to think this is no big deal and Sony can just stay the course.This is the new Nintendo = done.
That preduction fell flat on it's face, so will this.
This is indeed important, and something I tend to overlook because I am mostly a singleplayer consumer. I agree this will also become a major factor.I agree with most of this, but I'd add one additional example of a system buyer.
To play games with your friends on the hardware they own
In a world before crossplay was more common, a lot of people bough and Xbox or a Playstation because it's what their friends were buying/had bought. However we may now be approaching a world where the biggest draw for which console people buy based upon what their friends have (Call of Duty) might/will become an Xbox exclusive in 2-3 years. I don't think there's anyway for us to predict how big of an impact that'll have on US console sales in 2023 or 2024 whenever that exclusivity starts. Even in my best case scenario where CoD still comes to Playstation but only via Gamespass and crossplay exist, I still think a lot of US gamers will migrate to Xbox and stay on Xbox perpetually.
Jim Ryan should chain himself to the Acti building.
No war or something like that, but paradoxically I think it was sony that contributed to Microsoft buying out these big publishers.
Sony deprived a lot of third party content from the competition in the PS1/PS2 era which strongly contributed to the success of these consoles, they started again on a smaller scale with the PS4, but their plan with the PS5 was ambitious, insider said they approached every big publisher for exclusive content and if MS want to have these games they have to pay.
I don't think MS will be that agressive if its third party exclusives were not an important business model at sony.
You can look this thread lot people predicted what MS doing right now
Imran Khan: "Sony has locked timed exclusivity for some huge and widely known multiplatform games" News
Hbomax and NBCs Peacock aren't available on Fire TV or Roku due to disagreements about revenue and user data sharing. So people who have Fire TV or Roku and want to watch Friends or The Office are out of luck at the moment.www.resetera.com
EA or Ubisoft are probably next. I could see Square holding out for a while, or selling off certain studios piecemeal like Crystal Dynamics, etc.
They don't have enough money for that. It's impossible.Clearly the only possible way for Sony to survive this is to buy Nintendo and port their games to pc.
Nintendo: The Corporate IndieIf Nintendo has proven anything all these years, it's that you don't need to be the biggest if you play your cards smart in the video game industry.
None of those are even a blip on the radar compared to CODAll Sony needs to do is buy Kadokawa and Konami.
AAA first party Castlevania game brought to you by From Software.
Maybe they'll pick up Capcom as well. Love horror games? Gonna need that PS5 if you want Resident Evil and Silent Hill.
The future is looking soooo great for consumers, huh?
This is... not even remotely true.It was always a mistake to not have broken up Microsoft up back in the 90's. Any industry it enters, it's just too big and it bullies it.
Capital accumulation at work. This is the economic system we live in; eat or be eaten.
Eventually, Sony and Nintendo will be acquired by someone too.
apple makes 20x more sense
Sony pictures for their streaming
Sony lens's for phones
sony tech stack for IoT and smart cars
Sony PlayStation to grow Apple Arcade and gaming
from a meta verse perspective Disney could just buy PlayStation itself
Why does this matter to you? Who cares what people buy?I'm just worried that some people are gonna stop wanting to buy PS5's. From CoD fanboys to people simply waiting this out to see what the landscape looks like in a year or two. This AB deal isn't done until June of 2023 and that is a lot of uncertainty for a long time. I hate this!
No one cares about last-gen, or previous gens, or cross-play...they only wantpremium first party single player gamesremakes from Naughty dog...that much is clear!
The "Nintendoomed" situation was driven by people who thought Nintendo couldn't compete with weaker hardware and without the big 3rd party support. The flaw of this was ignoring the strength of Nintendo's first party IP and the fact many 3rd parties would still make weaker, cheaper Nintendo exclusives.This is the new Nintendo = done.
That preduction fell flat on it's face, so will this.
You have to be in serious denial to think this is no big deal and Sony can just stay the course.
This is the start of the new era for games... i can see this being the last playstation generation...
Unless a amazon or apple takes over I dont see sony surviving
lol no. Ever since Sega left the console industry, Nintendo has been the underdog.
Because Sony needs to make money and the console industry has already been disrupted by supply chain woes, and now this happens on the software/development side? That stings.
This is the new Nintendo = done.
That preduction fell flat on it's face, so will this.