-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Rashida Tlaib boos Hillary Clinton on stage
- Thread starter bye
- Start date
There's absolutely nothing false about what she said.
Oh that's not even the best part.
The masks slip so easily the second they're questioned by PoC.
Jesus, I know I'm not saying she doesn't have a right to be angry at her. However, turning it into such a public spectacle is the problem, especially in an election year as the party is trying to beat a strong incumbent.
I was just responding about revolutions leading to worse situations. Everyone should vote for whoever is running against Trump.
The first one everyone thinks of when you say french revolution. Reign of terror to Napoleon to world war Napoleon.
Oh shit Liam was a TA back when I was doing my undergrad at Irvine. Super knowledgeable, down to earth guy, everything I know about the revolutions in the Middle East I learned from him. Anyone in the area should totally support him.
Try posting something from this decade...
Sanders has the 2nd highest percentage of "No" I will not support the nominee if it's not their candidate...Yang's support base is just...ugh.
That's all well and good but i'm talking about giving a shit about what hillary supporters think.
65 million people voted for Hillary in the 2016 election, a substantial portion of those people will be voting in 2020 for whoever is the Democratic nominee for President, regardless of whatever comments Hillary made about Bernie. Not all of those 65 million people who voted for Hillary were supporters, but knew they needed to vote against Trump. Bernie will need that segment of the voting population to win the primary and in November against Trump.
That tweet is certainly a charitable interpretation, but I think the more likely explanation for those numbers is less the Warren campaign's ability to unify the electorate and more the lack of engagement with voters who aren't reliable Democratic partisans.
Either they go out and vote or they get 4 more years of Trump. If they can weather 4 more years of the GOP literally rolling back all progressive reforms in those next 4 years they might not go vote.
Yep. That much maligned Sanders canvassing script was 100% correct. Warren isn't getting anyone who isn't a wonk to vote for her, and they were already voting democratic anyway.
This needs to apply to every voter looking to oust Trump. Which is why we need to unite with the inevitable Democrat nominee.
They will vote for whoever the Dem nominee is if they are really serious about beating Trump. If Bernie wins the nomination and they don't vote for him then they are voting for Trump and are hypocrites.
I 100% agree. Hopefully it happens. This is why Clinton speaking like she is is so disappointing.
It's not that disappointing to me, it's expected. She'll do whatever is in her power to ensure the establishment candidate is nom.
the reason this thread is still going is the polling suggesting the opposite problem.
These percentages could mean drastically different things depending on who took the poll and what the raw numbers for each candidate were. If some candidates are pulling from independents or republicans, it those No answers might be good news. But if it's a poll of just registered Democrats, no bien.
Well the poll posting in this thread could mean totally different things. Since we don't know who was polled its hard to read much into it. Its also just one poll. Shouldn't read too much from one poll.
This is also a symptom of the problem...Sanders represents a movement of people who that are hinging their paths forward on running with the momentum Sanders allows the progressive movement by winning the Presidency.
These are people who feel like Sanders is the only one who actually represents the sentiment they are trying to spread. If he loses it will deal a serious blow to the huge percentage of democratic base who have been pushed to desperation in suitably desperate times.
In this way, electing Joe biden definitely would be a risk whereas electing Sanders would get the democratic centrists who support people like Joe as well as many more independents than Biden and even conservative Republicans.