Because the range of hardware is much better than what's in these consoles? If you want a wide range of options it's PC gaming you are looking for.Why the fuck PC users can play either 4K30 fps or 1080p 60 fps depending on their choice but PS4 Pro gotta be 1080P60fps because i say so ?
it's not a 1:1 performance trade off, they'd have to optimize for different things to get 4k/30fps running smoothly vs 1080p/60fpsWhy the fuck PC users can play either 4K30 fps or 1080p 60 fps depending on their choice but PS4 Pro gotta be 1080P60fps because i say so ?
Why the fuck PC users can play either 4K30 fps or 1080p 60 fps depending on their choice but PS4 Pro gotta be 1080P60fps because i say so ?
Love the fact that they chose 60fps over 4k. This kind of game will benefit hugely because of 60fps. Anyone who says otherwise is straight up wrong.
Same. I really wish they would just give us the option.
Getting this day 1, but hope they've learnt a lot from Mad Max, which was poorly supported... especially as they are talking more like games as a service type language. Still miffed that you couldn't reset the camps and track rings in mad max, meaning achievements were a nightmare to complete (and Im not playing mad max the whole way through again as it was a boring slog doing all the activities).
Because the range of hardware is much better than what's in these consoles? If you want a wide range of options it's PC gaming you are looking for.
Exactly.Hopefully a 4K option gets patched in later. This is the reason I have an X and a Pro.
Having ID doing the shooting mechanics will make this a 1000% better game than mad max.
Its not fast pacedThe amount of people in her who want to play a fast paced shooter at anything less than 60 is dumbfounding.
Nah. 60 fps needs to be forced on people. 30 fps needs to die already.
Hopefully it won't be an issue anymore next gen. Unless someone decides that they need to do cinematic gameplay because the human eyes can't see more than 24 fps.
With raytracing being a focus next gen you're going to get more 30, not lessHopefully it won't be an issue anymore next gen. Unless someone decides that they need to do cinematic gameplay because the human eyes can't see more than 24 fps.
This is kind of my issue as well. I'm hoping this means the X version has a ton more detail, shadows, and the like.It's not about 60fps not being a good thing. The problem is quite clear... the X is faster than the pro - by quite a margin. Essentially here you have both systems running the game at the same quality and the same frame rate.
Sooo... either the pro is seriously dropping frames and is nowhere near 60fps... or the X is really pushing detail and loss everywhere...
But regardless, the systems pushing the same? That doesn't make sense. If the game is hitting 60fps on pro, then it should be able to easily hit 1440p on X at the same detail.
So I have no idea what's going on here but i really hate the way the x is given such a hard shoulder by devs sometimes. Just screams wrong to me.
It's not about 60fps not being a good thing. The problem is quite clear... the X is faster than the pro - by quite a margin. Essentially here you have both systems running the game at the same quality and the same frame rate.
Sooo... either the pro is seriously dropping frames and is nowhere near 60fps... or the X is really pushing detail and loss everywhere...
But regardless, the systems pushing the same? That doesn't make sense. If the game is hitting 60fps on pro, then it should be able to easily hit 1440p on X at the same detail.
So I have no idea what's going on here but i really hate the way the x is given such a hard shoulder by devs sometimes. Just screams wrong to me.
The amount of people in her who want to play a fast paced shooter at anything less than 60 is dumbfounding.
It's not competitiveThe amount of people in her who want to play a fast paced shooter at anything less than 60 is dumbfounding.
Everybody. There isn't a single case where 30fps is better than 60fps. Only people who will disagree are people who have never gone back and played something they are used to in 30 then play it in 60+. You will never want to go back. The downgrade is too big.
Everybody. There isn't a single case where 30fps is better than 60fps. Only people who will disagree are people who have never gone back and played something they are used to in 30 then play it in 60+. You will never want to go back. The downgrade is too big.
Everybody. There isn't a single case where 30fps is better than 60fps. Only people who will disagree are people who have never gone back and played something they are used to in 30 then play it in 60+. You will never want to go back. The downgrade is too big.
Everybody. There isn't a single case where 30fps is better than 60fps. Only people who will disagree are people who have never gone back and played something they are used to in 30 then play it in 60+. You will never want to go back. The downgrade is too big.
I mean, the X is significantly stronger than the pro. It should easily be able to run the same game, at the same framerate, at a higher resolution compared to the Pro. So it's dissapointing that the large power gap isn't being used.do you think they should do a special optimization for the Xbox One X? that is too much work, was clear from the get go that this machine won´t be pushed to the max at all because it would be much more work for developers to achieve that.
"just screams wrong" is nonsense imo, you can´t expect that devs will go the extra mile for one console, they will try to achieve an equal level for both upgraded consoles and that is it.
people expected way too much out of the X´s performance advantage...
Why can't we have higher resolution on the X. Dynamic or whatever, no need for it to be at 1080p if the pro can manage that.