Why does capitalism like to control our behavior indirectly, giving us merely the illusion of freedom?
Who do we go after once everyone is vaccinated and we're still getting the sniffles?
I hope I don't get banned again for this, but I think a lot of you are not really looking at the numbers. When you look at case counts, especially here in BC, from Dec 31 to Jan 6th, 82% of the new cases were to people who were fully vaccinated. Non or partially counted for only 17.8%. Yes, more people who were non or partially were in the hospitals, but in the end, it is the people who are fully vaccinated who seem to be spreading Covid around the most. So on the one hand people want to tax those who are non vaccinated, but on the other, why are those who are fully vaccinated and seem completely oblivious to the viruses spread not taxed as well? In a way it feels like a witchhunt where society once again looks for a boogey man to make themselves feel good
COVID hospitalizations increase by 23% over the weekend
I got my second does last month, but I still don't feel safe going out into the public other than for groceries. My neighbour alone went to a ski hill, met a buddy and his gf, went skiing, got home and then proceeded to get sick with covid. His gf then caught it from him. Do you know who gave it to them? His buddy at the ski hill who went and got tested and told him he had it first. Now how many more people did that buddy infect by going to the ski hill? Its also sad that my neighbour's gf who works in health care had to stay home for over two weeks instead of the helping the patients at the nursing home.
Anyway, stay safe and keep healthy.
Why does capitalism like to control our behavior indirectly, giving us merely the illusion of freedom?
We live in a society (tm), you don't have the freedom to fuck other people up
Likely that it's easier legally and gov is broke.Why aren't governments forcing every citizen to take the vaccine? Why would such a scenario be a bad thing to have if it would save more lives than their indirect attempts like introducing a health tax?
I'm just confused from an ideological standpoint.
So the argument seems to be that anything you do that could affect other people is OK to be regulated?
Why aren't governments forcing every citizen to take the vaccine? Why would such a scenario be a bad thing to have if it would save more lives than their indirect attempts like introducing a health tax?
I'm just confused from an ideological standpoint.
So the argument seems to be that anything you do that could affect other people is OK to be regulated?
Why aren't governments forcing every citizen to take the vaccine? Why would such a scenario be a bad thing to have if it would save more lives than their indirect attempts like introducing a health tax?
I'm all on board with making the lives of the non-vaccinated folks difficult as possible, but I worry about this.
As a fellow Canadian, I totally get that because we all pay for health care, we need to do our part and the non-vaccinated are definitely adding additional costs to this. That said, I worry that taxing the non-vaccinated is a slippery slope that will lead to taxing others based on their health choices (smoking, eating, drinking, not exercising etc).
I'm not sure what the right answer is though. Even if we say "non-vaccinated have to pay for covid related hospital stays" (another thing I like), but that could also lead to "you're 20 pounds overweight.. you have to pay for the stint we just put into your heart"
The Quebec government seems to be framing it as "your choices are too expensive, so you have to pay extra" I think is wrong. I'd rather it be framed as "your choices are hurting others".
Either way. Fuck people who aren't doing their part.
I'm all on board with making the lives of the non-vaccinated folks difficult as possible, but I worry about this.
As a fellow Canadian, I totally get that because we all pay for health care, we need to do our part and the non-vaccinated are definitely adding additional costs to this. That said, I worry that taxing the non-vaccinated is a slippery slope that will lead to taxing others based on their health choices (smoking, eating, drinking, not exercising etc).
I'm not sure what the right answer is though. Even if we say "non-vaccinated have to pay for covid related hospital stays" (another thing I like), but that could also lead to "you're 20 pounds overweight.. you have to pay for the stint we just put into your heart"
The Quebec government seems to be framing it as "your choices are too expensive, so you have to pay extra" I think is wrong. I'd rather it be framed as "your choices are hurting others".
Either way. Fuck people who aren't doing their part.
We live in a democracy. Most people support vaccine mandates. Most people would not support an additional tax on people who are overweight or who "don't exercise enough", and no governement would ever get elected if they proposed such a thing. This "slippery slope" shit is all just anit-vaxx rhetoric and it's dangerous as fuck.I agree completely. But I don't believe that is how the government is framing this mandate. My understanding is that they are framing it as "your choices are too costly to the health care system" and not "your choices are making other people sick".
Plus, you can still spread covid if you have your vax
I'm all on board with making the lives of the non-vaccinated folks difficult as possible, but I worry about this.
As a fellow Canadian, I totally get that because we all pay for health care, we need to do our part and the non-vaccinated are definitely adding additional costs to this. That said, I worry that taxing the non-vaccinated is a slippery slope that will lead to taxing others based on their health choices (smoking, eating, drinking, not exercising etc).
I'm not sure what the right answer is though. Even if we say "non-vaccinated have to pay for covid related hospital stays" (another thing I like), but that could also lead to "you're 20 pounds overweight.. you have to pay for the stint we just put into your heart"
The Quebec government seems to be framing it as "your choices are too expensive, so you have to pay extra" I think is wrong. I'd rather it be framed as "your choices are hurting others".
Either way. Fuck people who aren't doing their part.
This a million times.We live in a democracy. Most people support vaccine mandates. Most people would not support an additional tax on people who are overweight or who "don't exercise enough", and no governement would ever get elected if they proposed such a thing. This "slippery slope" shit is all just anit-vaxx rhetoric and it's dangerous as fuck.
LOL this is screaming "separated from payroll".capitalism will lead the way
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jpmorgan-jamie-dimon-covid-vaccine-workers-pay/
This fucking talking point again. Alcohol and tobacco is fucking taxed. It's built into the goddamn price. Good fuck. How do you not fucking know this? I even remember growing up when the cigarette prices increased insanely overnight and smokers were bitching and moaning about it. There is nowhere in Canada where this isn't true - at least for smoking for sure. Unless you're First Nations. Pretty sure they don't have those kinds of taxes. So now you can stop spreading this false rhetoric.I'm all on board with making the lives of the non-vaccinated folks difficult as possible, but I worry about this.
As a fellow Canadian, I totally get that because we all pay for health care, we need to do our part and the non-vaccinated are definitely adding additional costs to this. That said, I worry that taxing the non-vaccinated is a slippery slope that will lead to taxing others based on their health choices (smoking, eating, drinking, not exercising etc).
I'm not sure what the right answer is though. Even if we say "non-vaccinated have to pay for covid related hospital stays" (another thing I like), but that could also lead to "you're 20 pounds overweight.. you have to pay for the stint we just put into your heart"
The Quebec government seems to be framing it as "your choices are too expensive, so you have to pay extra" I think is wrong. I'd rather it be framed as "your choices are hurting others".
Either way. Fuck people who aren't doing their part.
If you're unvaccinated, you're more likely to be in an ICU bed. That is cost. I know your quote talks about spread but I haven't looked into it enough to know whether the unvaccinated spread omicron at a higher relative rate. At this point that doesn't really matter though.I agree completely. But I don't believe that is how the government is framing this mandate. My understanding is that they are framing it as "your choices are too costly to the health care system" and not "your choices are making other people sick".
Plus, you can still spread covid if you have your vax
Canada says vaccine mandates work as Quebec's 'unvaxxed tax' leads to spike in first-dose appointments | CNN
One day after the Canadian province of Quebec announced it would financially penalize residents who are unvaccinated, the province's health minister said Wednesday first-time appointments spiked in the hours following the announcement.www.cnn.com
Front Page on CNN
Not shocked that they backed out. They already did that with the Nurses a few months ago.