well maybe i want a sylveon party
I'm in the minority but I prefer the cries from Stadium 1/2. Animal/mechanical noises tweaked to sound pretty close to the ingame cries from the GBC games.
Only if you choose to do so though. Completely down to you if you want to make things easier for yourself, the game isn't going to force you.
I never said I don't believe you. I just don't put stock in the overleveling stuff since my experience never matches those comments. shit, I struggled against Seibold until I became overleveled. there's more ways to level up since they added catching pokemon to boost levels. I don't catch much more than I need for a party
What you fail to account for is that From Software has never really added an easy mode before, and even then, a lot of people (like me) still clamor for one. Gamefreak, however, has included the ability to toggle EXP. Share off since they added it, and there is absolutely no reason why it should be gone.
This still does not explain why they cut it whatsoever. This does not address the issue of the feature being gone, instead tries to downplay it by finding ways around it. There is no reason why we can't have both. If you find one, please tell me.
I mean, it would be Galarian Marill, though. The same way they say only Galarian Linoones can evolve into Obstagoon, they can just say Galarian Marills don't produce Azurill. Galarian Marill, Galarian Azumarill, and new evolution would functionally still be a 3-Pokemon evolution line.
They have difficulty mode built in to the game design. What weapons you use, if you're using magic, etc
Sure, it would be a ton of people. But it's a record it once in high quality and you're good to go for that pokemon. Each person would do multiple lines of pokemon and I think it would end up being a lot less time consuming/costly than you think. The cries just don't do anything for me so I play the games muted, soundtrack be damned.
Developers always think about how they can streamline things so that general players can have a better experience without having to think about it. You don't have to agree with it or like it, but that's how things work.
No, that's not a justification. I'll bring up my previous quote once again:
I honestly don't understand what you are trying to say here. Removing an options is... streamlining things?
Ok:
Well.
The creators want to make a fine tuned experience wherein they have more control over what level people will likely be. That doesn't have to—and won't—convince you, but that's the answer.
It's streamlining things for people who used to leave it on, which they say is the majority of people.
In other words you have to basically have to keep only a single Pokemon on you at all times. Completely taking away from the team building aspect of the entire franchise.
You are not addressing the issue. Even if there are more options, please explain to me the reasoning behind taking away one of them.
And? Because it is "their answer" (assuming it is) I should just accept it?
What? People that want to leave it on don't care about this in the first place. How is this streamlining things in any way?
It's an item that's given to you and requires an explanation. Then people have to wonder if it's better to leave it on or turn it off, or maybe juggle between leaving it on and turning it off just sometimes. They don't want people to worry about those things, as they feel it doesn't offer any huge benefit.
In other words they think making players think is bad. That doesn't bode well for the game.
Or, they want players to worry about things they think actually matter rather than wasting time on inconsequential things.
Ok, let's say this is their explanation. Do you agree with it or are you against it?
Being able to turn it off while the game is balanced around it being on would be ideal
But that's streamlining for us core fans! This is our game!
Exactly.
I don't mind either way because this particular feature doesn't impact me but I might feel differently if it was about something I care about, like the option to go from Switch to Set battles
Out of curiosity, have they even confirmed if set battles are in? I know it would be extremely odd to remove them, but I would have said the same about the ability to turn off EXP share.
Maybe, it's hard to say. The fact they haven't shown us the Kanto forms in game is suspicious.
Then why do you go to these lengths to excuse GF for this? Do you honestly believe that what GF is doing, according to you, is worth the loss of a feature?
Well set battles are how competitive works, and they do actually affect gameplay. I don't think they're comparable. But anyways people have played the game so if they weren't in we would know by now
I'm not excusing them. You can criticize their decision, think it's stupid, and want them to revert it back. But it's still something developers think about when making games and they didn't remove it out of spite or laziness.
