But you were saying its sales are proof that they should have done it sooner when we can't say that for sure as Switch has portable aspects and is treated as a portable by many
because the switch is booming. and is also a handheld thats very appealing globally
i really just cant imagine console pokemon games being a worthwhile risk before the switch
You're right, but my reference to Zelda was in reference to the animations. The only sacrifice required for good animation is development time.Breath of the Wild gets used a lot but you can see the very clear sacrifices made to reach its scope. Lack of enemy variety, no caves or small dungeons are a frequent complaint about the game.
Zelda usually has some good enemy variety and good dungeons, but they were cut to reach the scope of its vast open world.
Funny thing. I've played the entire series and I enjoyed this one more than many others. I guess you can please millions of people even when angering cynics.Good job on the boycott, guys!
Absolutely ridiculous. The most cynical, soulless games in the series selling the most since Gold and Silver.
I mean the last generation starter did 14.69 million, so it's not like this is miles aheadWell, I'm basing myself in the fact previous portable-only titles didn't had such sales rate. Sure Switch has a portable option, but if this is the only reason and console element is meaningless, care to explain why this didn't happened before?
Please, stop with the hyperbole. This is just ignoring all the QoL and other stuffs added in SW and ShNope.
All these sales tell GF is that they can continue to make mediocre games and people will eat it up.
This isn't Gold/Silver :PImpressive! 16 million people played the worst single player campaign in the whole series.
(Online battling is the best it's ever been, though...)
You're not wrong tho. The story was very lame. But I still had lots of fun with it. I mean I played already 175 hrs and actually don't know how I managed to do that. The raids are just addictive as hell and there are many very cool QoL improvements. I'm also very looking foreward to the DLCsImpressive! 16 million people played the worst single player campaign in the whole series.
(Online battling is the best it's ever been, though...)
in my previous post i made the exception of the wii.Well, I'm basing myself in the fact previous portable-only titles didn't had such sales rate. Sure Switch has a portable option, but if this is the only reason and console element is meaningless, care to explain why this didn't happened before?
DS was booming, too, perhaps even stronger than Switch, but it's Pokémon games never had such fast performance. Care to explain this?
What about the Wii? You think it "didn't worth the risk"? Well, that's some controversial opinion, for sure.
Impressive! 16 million people played the worst single player campaign in the whole series.
(Online battling is the best it's ever been, though...)
I mean the last generation starter did 14.69 million, so it's not like this is miles ahead
in my previous post i made the exception of the wii.
would a pokemon game have sold anywhere close to the handheld games if on Gamecube or wii u? not even close. even then, I think even the wii would be a stretch. perhaps pokemon is just on a rise thanks to other factors. I dont see how this means theres a correlation between the desire for console pokemon and sales
You're not wrong tho. The story was very lame. But I still had lots of fun with it. I mean I played already 175 hrs and actually don't know how I managed to do that. The raids are just addictive as hell and there are many very cool QoL improvements. I'm also very looking foreward to the DLCs
Like I was expecting quite a response to lower sales. The fact it did better than I thought and the responses to it are as they are...it's a good morning
Sun & Moon is the last generation starter...Eh... not really. By April 2014, X/Y sold 12M, it came out in October 2013. It wasn't anywhere close to Sw/Sh.
IIRC we don't actually have accurate sales numbers for Red and Blue.
Eh... not really. By April 2014, X/Y sold 12M, it came out in October 2013. It wasn't anywhere close to what Sw/Sh did in 1.6 month.
They're referring to the first new gen on a console.Like I was expecting quite a response to lower sales. The fact it did better than I thought and the responses to it are as they are...it's a good morning
Sun & Moon is the last generation starter...
Did you forget Sun/Moon exist ?Eh... not really. By April 2014, X/Y sold 12M, it came out in October 2013. It wasn't anywhere close to what Sw/Sh did in 1.6 month.
Ah yes, refering to something without actually mentioning the word Console.
Breeding's basically been unchanged for those 20 years. The only thing that's improved since then are minor QoL improvements.
Pokémon Sword and Shield is interesting in that it's a fun game, but every pre-release criticism of it was completely valid.
EVERYBODY WINS
Second worse gen for me. I feel like this game solidified that we are never getting real dungeons again. And twenty years later breeding is still boring.
I mean your on era when someone says generation 9 times out of 10 they mean console, they probably just forgot.Did you forget Sun/Moon exist ?
Ah yes, refering to something without actually mentioning the word Console.
30 millions imo. It's gonna keep selling strong decent throughout 2020 with strong boosts on June and Fall (dlc releases). By end of 2020 it will be above 25 millions probably.What is the Ceiling at this point ? we know there won't be a new game this year and the DLC will boost the game's sales, it'll outsell Gold and Silver at this point
I agree but on the other hand how do we know the backlash effect? I mean we only know how much it sold know, we don't know how much it would have sold without the backlash. For example I bought Let's Go Eevee day one but decided to skip this one. I can't be the only one and we all know of a few people who actually didn't buy the game because of the dexit. (for me it wasn't the dexit, there were other factor too and lack of communication from GF)To people being snarky, please allow me to clarify: nobody ever thought the backlash would make a difference. That's kind of why it was such an upsetting situation. Because we knew that, no matter what choice GameFreak made, it would be reinforced by massive sales and they would move forward with that decision. We weren't sad that we wouldn't have all Pokemon in SWSH, we were sad because we wouldn't have all Pokemon ever again because it would sell well regardless.
Game Freak puts band aids on problems instead of overhauling or fixing them. Remember in Sun/Moon where they purposefully put a little enclave that you could spin around in next to the breeding center? Instead of fixing the main problems of breeding (heavily RNG based, limited gameplay interaction when it comes to hatching, time-wasting), they just let you spin in a box so you wouldn't have to go back and forth down one route.Breeding's basically been unchanged for those 20 years. The only thing that's improved since then are minor QoL improvements.
Unfortunately, it feels like most of GF's attempts to fix the tedium of preparing for competitive battling are just time reduction instead of changing the mechanics to be more interesting.
I was afraid it was the wrong decision but now realise, it's the best thing they ever come up withTheir decision to go with DLC instead of a 3rd version is about to pay off tremendously
I would put it over XY lol. XY doesn't even have E4 rematches.I stand by my comment, SwSh has the worst single player campaign of the whole series. Virtually no story, no sidequests, nothing to do in each town but going to the Gym, absolutely garbage pacing, bad characters (especially coming from the great SuMo).
There were certainly people that did. Even here there have been polls as well as people claiming that the games would sell less than Let's Go.To people being snarky, please allow me to clarify: nobody ever thought the backlash would make a difference. That's kind of why it was such an upsetting situation. Because we knew that, no matter what choice GameFreak made, it would be reinforced by massive sales and they would move forward with that decision. We weren't sad that we wouldn't have all Pokemon in SWSH, we were sad because we wouldn't have all Pokemon ever again because it would sell well regardless.
Even aside from the controversy, this was a bottom tier Pokemon for me (I deliberately bought it used). It could have been absolute garbage-- there was no way that the first console Pokemon RPG would flop. People have been wanting this for over two decades, myself included. It just didn't happen in the way I wanted.
All of the games have an area near the Daycare for hatching eggs.Game Freak puts band aids on problems instead of overhauling or fixing them. Remember in Sun/Moon where they purposefully put a little enclave that you could spin around in next to the breeding center? Instead of fixing the main problems of breeding (heavily RNG based, limited gameplay interaction when it comes to hatching, time-wasting), they just let you spin in a box so you wouldn't have to go back and forth down one route.
"EVERYONE WILL THINK THIS IS FUN!" - Someone who hates me
The worst part is that despite the ability to breed nearly every Pokémon with dozens of different Pokémon of various types and species, the only unique thing breeding provides is a few select inherited moves and the boring eugenics of IVs.Game Freak puts band aids on problems instead of overhauling or fixing them. Remember in Sun/Moon where they purposefully put a little enclave that you could spin around in next to the breeding center? Instead of fixing the main problems of breeding (heavily RNG based, limited gameplay interaction when it comes to hatching, time-wasting), they just let you spin in a box so you wouldn't have to go back and forth down one route.
"EVERYONE WILL THINK THIS IS FUN!" - Someone who hates me
Well, I'm basing myself in the fact previous portable-only titles didn't had such sales rate. Sure Switch has a portable option, but if this is the only reason and console element is meaningless, care to explain why this didn't happened before?
DS was booming, too, perhaps even stronger than Switch, but it's Pokémon games never had such fast performance. Care to explain this?
What about the Wii? You think it "didn't worth the risk"? Well, that's some controversial opinion, for sure.
When you are in a pokemon thread 10/10 times generation means Pokemon Generation.I mean your on era when someone says generation 9 times out of 10 they mean console, they probably just forgot.
This is just a communication mix up.
Like I was expecting quite a response to lower sales. The fact it did better than I thought and the responses to it are as they are...it's a good morning
Sun & Moon is the last generation starter...