not at allHypothetical question:
If the disc drive version supported BC for PS1 & 2, would people be more amenable to a $599 price tag?
Yup, as a UK fan I see zero reason to go digital. Launch day digital games are priced 25-30% more expensive than physical. I don't buying digital during sales, but day one is just a scam.
Gotcha...yeah got is on the radar...factions is not ha.
Wait what?! Your digital games are more expensive than physical on launch day?
Digital are RRP so £55-£60 but if you pre-order physical online you can get usually get games for £40-45.Wait what?! Your digital games are more expensive than physical on launch day?
Here's a question. What if Sony increased the price of PS+ by $5-10 and it's games to $70, think they'd try going lower if their game and plus prices go up So they'd wouldn't take as big of a loss?
Like, get Ps5 for $399 but pay us $69.99 for our games.
Yes. For example Avengers is 59.99 on the PS store right now. I can find it on physical from £42.99 with 49.99 being the most expensive.Wait what?! Your digital games are more expensive than physical on launch day?
Don't know about other countries in Europe but in my own country it's also between 20-30€ more expensive to buy digital day one. I really don't know why people would buy 70€ games when there are far cheaper options.Wait what?! Your digital games are more expensive than physical on launch day?
Ha ha ha.
Here is Australia digital launch at $100 and you can always find physical for around $70.Wait what?! Your digital games are more expensive than physical on launch day?
Lol I thought was samus
Don't know about other countries in Europe but in my own country it's also between 20-30€ more expensive to buy digital day one. I really don't know why people would buy 70€ games when there are far cheaper options.
The $100 price difference for a $20-30 part (optical drive) helps them recoup more toward the losses on the DE.I still don't see either PS5 model launching at $399 US. Regardless, I really don't see a gap of $100 between either model.
The $100 price difference for a $20-30 part (optical drive) helps them recoup more toward the losses on the DE.
Couple the perhaps slightly profitable $499 version (wasn't the BOM around $470?) with a few digital downloads and the loss on the DE isn't so bad- especially once the system itself becomes cheaper to make and they still charge that extra $100 on the optical drive version.
The $100 price difference for a $20-30 part (optical drive) helps them recoup more toward the losses on the DE.
Couple the perhaps slightly profitable $499 version (wasn't the BOM around $470?) with a few digital downloads and the loss on the DE isn't so bad- especially once the system itself becomes cheaper to make and they still charge that extra $100 on the optical drive version.
I'm not sure I understand; a $100 price difference will negate the $70-80 loss on the BOM of the digital edition? Wouldn't they minimize the loss by making the price difference closer to the $20-30 cost of the BR drive (like maybe a $50 gap rather than $100)?
If the regular (and more popular) version is more profitable in the long term, they can afford to loose slightly more on the $399 version longer term to market the PS5 as $399. They're going to basically charge a premium to get the optical drive.I'm not sure I understand; a $100 price difference will negate the $70-80 loss on the BOM of the digital edition? Wouldn't they minimize the loss by making the price difference closer to the $20-30 cost of the BR drive (like maybe a $50 gap rather than $100)?
Source? And I'm not talking about articles with poor assumptions of what you'd need to spend to build a PC with a 1TB SSD in it.
No, the point is to move the consumer from physical to digital.
If you put a 50$ gap, you are not going to do that.
If the regular (and more popular) version is more profitable in the long term, they can afford to loose slightly more on the $399 version longer term to market the PS5 as $399. They're going to basically charge a premium to get the optical drive.
Even after the BOM drops in price- always expect the version with the $20 optical drive to be $100 more expensive than the DE.
No, the point is to move the consumer from physical to digital.
If you put a 50$ gap, you are not going to do that.
It's not going to be $50. People will pay a premium to get the optical drive… otherwise they'll get the "cheaper" DE and all the PSN money goes directly to Sony.Unless the $50 gap is for a price point that is already looking ridiculously low to begin with...
Sony are the masters of leveraging brand recognition. The PS5 is gonna be absolutely fucking massive when it launches.Dont forget about the liquid hydrogen cooling....
They sure know how to hype up their PS5 events.
Unless the $50 gap is for a price point that is already looking ridiculously low to begin with...
It's not going to be $50. People will pay a premium to get the optical drive… otherwise they'll get the "cheaper" DE and all the PSN money goes directly to Sony.
Nintendo switch three years ago.So will this be the latest a console manufacturer ever took to reveal the price of their console? Anyone?
So will this be the latest a console manufacturer ever took to reveal the price of their console? Anyone?