Because he's badass as fuck
Because he's badass as fuck
Moments of brilliance and visually stunning but brought down by a plot that is incredibly stupid and riddled with so many plot holes and character assassinations it still amazes me it made it to shooting in that form. It needed a complete rewrite.
The negative reactions to the movie will mean that Disney is going to play it really safe from now on. Which is the REAL damage done to Star Wars.
I thought the film was OK, but I can't really argue with any of that.
Having Rey basically stuck on an island for 75% of movie listening to Luke whine and "not really" train her is kinda wasting what should be the protagonist of the story, and then "mopey Luke" kinda takes over the 3rd act of the movie too.
Like yeah I get the whole "you know what, we're going to subvert what everyone expects by Luke NOT training Rey! Because everyone expects him to train Rey, so we're not gonna do that!" ... OK, yes, but then why is she basically held on the island, not growing as a character for about 75% of the movie?
If anything Luke takes over too much of the movie. If that's the direction you wanted to go in, then his role and Rey's time on the island needed to be scaled back and the 3rd act should be about Rey primarily. But they kinda wanted their cake (subvert the Luke as a mentor archetype) but eat it too (still he's Luke Skywalker, even if he's a bit of a jerk, he's going to basically take over the movie!).
Either he is a character that is helping the main character advanced her plot, if he's not, then having him hold her back (basically) for most of the movie just for subversion's sake is a plot problem.
The negative reactions to the movie will mean that Disney is going to play it really safe from now on. Which is the REAL damage done to Star Wars.
Objectively wrong loland 30% of the time deliberately "subverting expectations", but just for the sake of subverting expectations and not in any way that made sense for the story, for the characters etc.
Having Luke's/Anakin's saber became a totem of the force because it has been at the center of so many moments shifts of the balance of the Force was a really interesting element introduced in TFA....That just gets dropped or rather tossed aside in TLJ. It's one of the ways that was set to expand our understanding of how the Force interacts with worldly objects able to call to Rey and give vivid visions. Same with Vader's charred helmet being a totem of the dark side for Kylo...which also is never mentioned again.
It even goes as far as destroying the saber ending that avenue of exploration of the Force through physical objects.
There are so many details just left flat and not touched on in favor of retreading old ground to try to lazily subvert expectations.
I'm tired of reading this lazy and nonsensical bullshitwriting to script to subvert expectations just for the sake of subverting expectations
Well, the alternative to Rian Johnson writing to script to subvert expectations just for the sake of subverting expectations is that he actually is just a bad writer with a weak grasp of Star Wars lore. Maybe it was both?
Like they haven't played it painfully safe so far?? Everything they've put out has been safe, with creativity muffled --- TFA being ANH-redux, Rogue One having its director hamstrung with reshoots and composer sacked at the last minute, even choosing "Solo" as the concept for the 2nd standalone film, and then not letting the creative visionaries of Lord & Miller carry forward their work to completion, axing the extended universe and then releasing mainly sub-par quality books, Rebels & Resistance show being their only TV output, catered to undiscerning kids under the age of 10 etc.
Even TLJ, which spent about 70% of its time riffing amateurly off of ESB and ROTJ or just being painfully cliché or nonsensical, and 30% of the time deliberately "subverting expectations", but just for the sake of subverting expectations and not in any way that made sense for the story, for the characters etc.
I really liked the film. There were a couple of parts that I thought could have been tweaked, but the movie wasn't as bad as some people claimed. Star Wars fans are going to ruin Star Wars for me long before Disney will.
- Ben killed his abusive mentor and assumed control of the First Order. He failed to turn Rey, but it's clear he was planning to use her in order to kill Snoke. He succeeded in that respect.Who is Snoke - killed Snoke
Who is Rey - a nobody
Ben Solo - ... what did he accomplish? ally?
Force Vision - don't give a shit
O! Let's include Yoda for no apparent reason - profit.
That's about it.
Here's the thing, It's okay to not like it or to be unsatisfied or to think the movie is dumb, but responses like these are unintentionally toxifying the waters with dismissive vitriol. Or, you are misinterpreting things.Rian Johnson is capable of writing good movies. He is.
But not a Star Wars movie.
It's like he took every mystery out of the Force Awakens and thought to himself : "How am I going to expand on this? O wait! Let's just ... make sure I unravel the mystery in the most dumb-ass way possible in order to get it all out of the way so I can expand the universe with random shit!? Yeah! That'll work!".
Who is Snoke - killed Snoke
Who is Rey - a nobody
Ben Solo - ... what did he accomplish? ally?
Force Vision - don't give a shit
O! Let's include Yoda for no apparent reason - profit.
That's about it.
Rian Johnson is capable of writing good movies. He is.
But not a Star Wars movie.
It's like he took every mystery out of the Force Awakens and thought to himself : "How am I going to expand on this? O wait! Let's just ... make sure I unravel the mystery in the most dumb-ass way possible in order to get it all out of the way so I can expand the universe with random shit!? Yeah! That'll work!".
Who is Snoke - killed Snoke
Who is Rey - a nobody
Ben Solo - ... what did he accomplish? ally?
Force Vision - don't give a shit
O! Let's include Yoda for no apparent reason - profit.
That's about it.
Where do you guys come up with this behind the scenes fan fiction?
If you followed the development of the movie at all, you'd know Rian's approach was simple: create a challenge for each character to overcome.
Rey - a reluctant teacher and her past.
Kylo - his master (and Luke at the end, and failed).
Luke - past demons.
Poe - his own character flaws.
Finn - his own notions of right/wrong and of course Phasma.
Each character in this movie fundamentally rebuilt who they are. Think about that for a second. That's a huge achievement.
Sure, there are problems with the movie. The mutiny. Canto. But for the most part a triumphant success.
This popped up in my feed this morning, and made a great companion piece to this thread.
How exactly does a movie subvert expectations just for the sake of subverting expectations? How do you measure that?
In TLJ's case it would be taking plot points and cliff-hangers from previous SW movies and dismissing them quickly and without consequence. Granted we haven't gotten the third movie so maybe this stuff can all change.
Shit like Luke comically throwing the lightsaber over his shoulder
Rey and Kylo not doing something unique and instead reverting to series staple light side vs dark side rebels vs empire
Snoke just dead like a nameless goon
Rey's lineage not being a factor in her connection to the force
Some of those I'm okay with the outcome, mainly the last two, but I think they could have handled the execution much better.
I think that moment played well to people who didn't have a great taste in their mouth at the way TFA ended.Honestly I felt many of the moments that were supposed to "subvert expectations" were written not to serve the narrative but instead Rian Johnson's own ego.
I mean things like the lightsaber being tossed away. I actually don't mind the object not being of much consequence, but the particular manner of that scene immediately put a lot of the audience on a hostile footing. It came across as RJ thinking he was being really clever but saying "fuck the previous film, I'm doing my own thing in this one".
Some people like that kind of thing, I guess. But it's easy to see why a lot of people didn't enjoy watching a film full of literal "gotcha" moments.
Honestly I felt many of the moments that were supposed to "subvert expectations" were written not to serve the narrative but instead Rian Johnson's own ego.
I mean things like the lightsaber being tossed away. I actually don't mind the object not being of much consequence, but the particular manner of that scene immediately put a lot of the audience on a hostile footing. It came across as RJ thinking he was being really clever but saying "fuck the previous film, I'm doing my own thing in this one".
Some people like that kind of thing, I guess. But it's easy to see why a lot of people didn't enjoy watching a film full of literal "gotcha" moments.
I mean things like the lightsaber being tossed away. I actually don't mind the object not being of much consequence, but the particular manner of that scene immediately put a lot of the audience on a hostile footing. It came across as RJ thinking he was being really clever but saying "fuck the previous film, I'm doing my own thing in this one".
Wow, that's insanely disrespectful and insulting to a man who put his all into making a fantastic Star Wars movie.
Consider where Luke's character was, what he last did with a Lightsaber, and that he had turned completely away from that life. Then Rey, this random person turns up with Anakin's lightsaber. The one he killed children with, the one he turned on his master, the symbol of both his father's failure and the Jedi's failure, not to mention his own arguably.
People too often associate Jedi with lightsabers when the best Jedi were at their best when they turned away from that. Obi-Wan? Wins by lowering his lightsaber, letting Vader kill him. Yoda? Trains Luke in the spiritual side of the force. Luke himself? His real wins were when he turned his father back after he stopped using his Lightsaber, and when he saved the Resistance without a single swing of the Lightsaber, but also inspired the galaxy at the cost of his life.
Where Luke was as a character then, that reaction fit to a tee. Bitter fan reaction doesn't change that. It wasn't just for some "Subvert expectations" obsession people think he had, it just happened to subvert expectations while fitting the story and character at the time.
If you want to talk about disrespect, that is disrespectful right there. Disrespectful to the lore, disrespectful to the character, and disrespectful to the fanbase.
Imagine Luke having just cut off Vader's hand, Palpatine looming over them, urging Luke to kill his father and join him. Here are two ways the scene can go:
1) Luke stands up, stares coldly at Palpatine and deliberately and smoothly cast aside his lightsaber in defiance, indicating that he is a true Jedi, like his father before him.
2) Luke stands up, stares plainly at Palpatine and then quickly and jerkily flips the lightsaber over his shoulder, the music presents a "gotcha" moment cue, and Luke proceeds to walk away, leaving the emperor dumbfounded.
Here's TLJ equivalent:
1) Luke stands up, stares coldly at Rey and deliberately and smoothly cast aside his lightsaber in defiance, indicating that he is beyond such crude weapons, and walks past Rey, leading her to wonder just how wise and powerful Luke could be. The audience is clearly reminded of the very last time we saw Luke with a lightsaber, in ROTJ, and get major feels and intrigue.
2) Luke stands up, stares plainly at Rey and then quickly and jerkily flips the lightsaber over his shoulder, the music presents a "gotcha" moment cue, cuing the audience to laugh in a Marvel humor sort of way, and Luke proceeds to walk away with no explanation, leaving Rey dumbfounded.
1) Luke stands up, stares coldly at Rey and deliberately and smoothly cast aside his lightsaber in defiance, indicating that he is beyond such crude weapons, and walks past Rey, leading her to wonder just how wise and powerful Luke could be. The audience is clearly reminded of the very last time we saw Luke with a lightsaber, in ROTJ, and get major feels and intrigue.
Not really. Unless the definition of "disrespect" changed. Like, I understand not liking the film but there is nothing specifically disrespectful about that. Like even suggesting that it's disrespectful is basically admitting you feel the movie was a slight against your own ego which says more about you than the movie.If you want to talk about disrespect, that is disrespectful right there. Disrespectful to the lore, disrespectful to the character, and disrespectful to the fanbase.
You do realize Luke was in an entirely different place by the start of The Last Jedi than he was at the end of Return of the Jedi, right? Luke may have had his moment of rage, but he had a chance to turn this around. He still had an optimistic world view and things were changing in the universe for the better.
It had been years since Luke's failure with Ben. The loss of his students, the loss of his nephew, the realization that everything in life he spent decades working for...gone in one moment of weakness. He left everything a mostly broken man ready to live out his days on a small island in the middle of nowhere. To the Luke of that moment, being given a reminder of his failures, the failures of his family, the failures of his order before him? That world was behind him, he saw no value in it at that moment.
Context is key here.
So in the same way that R2D2 conveniently wakes up at the end of TFA to fill in a map to find Luke, Luke just happens to spend a 5-10 years away from everyone, cutting himself off from the Force, and yet there's no Yoda or Ben Kenobi or anyone that visits and mentors him to help turn him around? Conveniently, it has to wait until TLJ?
the bolded part in particular is why given all other characterization of Luke in this movie I have trouble with believing this would be a good storytelling choice
it would contradict all other aspects of his characterization at that point in the movie
even Luke had no belief in himself as powerful and wise
cutting himself off from the Force, and yet there's no Yoda or Ben Kenobi or anyone that visits and mentors him to help turn him around?
So in the same way that R2D2 conveniently wakes up at the end of TFA to fill in a map to find Luke, Luke just happens to spend a 5-10 years away from everyone, cutting himself off from the Force, and yet there's no Yoda or Ben Kenobi or anyone that visits and mentors him to help turn him around? Conveniently, it has to wait until TLJ?
Luke sure gave up everything after getting his hand chopped off, told that his father was the galaxy's mass murderer, and having his friend kidnapped. He sure messed up going to Cloud City, and that sure threw him into a downward spiral.
Luke's character arc painted in TLJ was no the be-all and -end all of paths that his character could have taken. Nor is it the most interesting. Nor is it the most broadly satisfying. Nor is it even the most sensible. Everyone who defends this choice seems to anoint Rian Johnson as some untouchable god who should be free of criticism and showered with praise.
JJ and Rian both fucked up with their choices --- the proof is in the almost 50/50 split of this poll. Better choices would have yielded significantly less split polls, and very interesting, satisfying choices could have been made to yield such results. Admit it and accept it, even if you love the choices made as they stand.