Yeah this is not a $399 release
I know you get absolutely slaughtered for even hinting that you don't care about VR on this forum but I don't care about VR..I just hope it's not a big focus of PS5. Everything else sounds pretty in line with what I was guessing, Fall 2020 probably $499. Hopefully BC beyond just PS4, I'd love to see high quality enhanced PS1 emulation on this.
I didn't realise until someone pointed it out either, but by 2020 PCIE 4.0 will be standard, good thinking by Cerny to make sure PS5 has it, PS4 having Sata 2 was an issue.oh ok I didn't know it was that far along. I guess if you're planning for the future it makes sense.
Yeah I seriously want this officially from Sony. Combine a monthly payment plan for 2 years with 2 years of PS+ and you can make getting the new console day one really attractive, even if the RRP is 500 or whatever and maybe higher than is ideal. Let's say hypothetically a £500 console and £50 a year PS+ Premium, that's only £600 which is £25 a month for 2 years. Most people would jump at that sort of contract to get the console day one.Nah. It's a different market that 2013. People are used to paying $1,000+ for their phones now. A super powerful console at $500 can do just fine. Especially since they will almost certainly be a 24 month payment plan or some shit.
they are going to 7nm from 28nm. thats a 4x chip size reduction. the Pro was 4.2 tflops on a 16nm chip at $399. X1X was 6 tflops on a 16nm at $499.Ray Tracing
Faster SSD tech than any PC can run currently
8K support
etc
$1000 console confirmed? Theres is NO way they can retail hardware like this for $400-500 in a small console box at that.
Well, the OP says customs SSD faster than what's available on PC. Could be an SSD with an optane like caching solution? IDK, but yeah probably an nvme pcie.
But one thing was clear MS changed stance of strongest console for anacando to matching ps5 specs in the latest rumor round
I hope that snippet about the heavy focus on VR turns out to be false. I really have no interest in that crap.
But one thing was clear MS changed stance of strongest console for anacando to matching ps5 specs in the latest rumor round
The price was one of the lesser reasons that PS4 did so much better than XBox One at launch. And we live in a different world now, where the generations aren't as fully separate from each other. We already have two power-levels of PS4 with games fully working with both and taking advantage of the extra power, and we know PS5 is going to be fully backwards compatible. Likely most new games will be written to work on both PS4 and PS5, with more features on PS5, and only the occasional exclusive. So PS5 becomes an option for those who want to spend more money, and for people who want to pay less, they can get a PS4 Pro.C'mon if Sony launches a cent over $399, they'll show us they learnt nothing.
According to what rumor mill? Last I heard MS was still pretty confident they'd have the power edge next round.
Yeah, this basically forces MS to announce something at E3, which they may not be ready to do yet. It's a smart move.
And they got hella flak for it once MS started pumping out BC left and right. You can bet your ass they're gonna jump on that bandwagon
Navi 10 & Ryzen 3600, which will cost about $600 to build on PC, $700 with an SSD, but Sony take a loss & get a discount.
All of that sounds great!
Are they just getting ahead of the inevitable devkit and spec leaks, just like MS did with Scorpio? Maybe they also felt they had to respond in some way to all the Stadia news and Microsoft's assurance that that they will go with streaming and consoles next gen?
Either way, I like the openness even if this PS5 reveal feels a bit random right now.
No last video by Brad Sam? Soesifically said matching ps5 with ananconda and close to x with lockhartAccording to what rumor mill? Last I heard MS was still pretty confident they'd have the power edge next round.
I don't get the people wanting 399. Why do you even want a ps5?
With inflation that's cheaper than the PS4 was at launch.
I would say ryzen 2700 and RTX 2060/70.
I mean sure, and the PS5 can also be 999$, everything's possible!I don't think it is actually unreasonable.
Flash memory / SSD pricing is absolutely crashing right now, so a fully SSD based unit is probably going to be totally feasible, certainly by fall 2020.
Secondly, I must explain SSD on PC and why this is both faster than any current common PC SSD in most situations, though we should certainly see a PC implementation soon enough for faster PC SSDs as well.
Regular SATA SSD/HDD/etc is limited to ~550MB/sec or so of bandwidth, and is transferred through the chipset itself on your board, which is then passed to CPU. Can't get any faster, as that is the practical limit of SATA AHCI 6GPS.
The past couple of years have seen direct PCIe bus-interface SSDs emerge, in X1, X2, and X4 variants. These types can hit 3000+ and use the same bus your GPU uses, natively connected to the CPU for extremely fast speeds. Current spec is PCI Express 3.0, but, Ryzen 2 is supporting PCIe 4.0, basically double the bandwidth.
More crucially however, is the number of lanes. In most common consumer PCs, you have only 16 PCIe lanes. When you're using more PCIe devices than you have lanes for, a certain amount of bottlenecking is there. Now higher end designs alleviate this. Socket 20xx Xeon gives you 40 lanes. Ryzen gives 24 lanes.
Hypothetically, an 8x NVME SSD could hit 6,000MB/sec with no problem on existing 3.0 boards (20xx or Ryzen, the 16 lanes on consumer line Intel such as I have in my gaming rig may not be able to do so without compromising a bit).
Further, an 8x NVME SSD on PCIe 4 should be potentially 12,000MB/sec. Now, I don't believe this would be the case for PS5, as that would mean more traces, more PCB complexity, and thus more $$ than really necessary focused on something like that. So, much more likely this is a PCIe 4.0 X4 interface yielding ~6,000MB/sec. VERY quick, and something that IS technically faster than current PC performance, at least until Ryzen 2 pops out a couple of months from now, AND then when 4.0 speed SSDs are produced by Samsung/etc.
Yep.
Not a smart move for a console that might release in 2020. Microsoft can smile and see "you'll see" and after a few months of the too-far-off PS5 dominating the hype cycle, everybody will have eyes on Microsoft in the run-up to a release to a Sony console, and that's a poor PR cycle position to be in. It's more likely that Sony did this to put a damper on Microsoft's current goodwill momentum what with positive stories about Microsoft plentiful in the press and Sony being the target of an unhealthy amount of negative press as of late.
-PSVR2 in 2020 also,reveal with ps5,big resolution boost probably 2560x1440,120hz,220 field of view,eye tracking,wireless,battery life 4-5 hours,headphones integrated,less motion sickenss,no breaker box,much less cable management,much more focus on VR for aaa games,price around 250$
Damn…
135m? Where'd you get that from?Yes but for the 135M owners of a PS4 why would that matter?
I have a PS4 not an Xbox, what I want is an SKU that is BC with the PS4...
There are lots of rumors going around, but I'm just going by what Phil Spencer actually said last E3. Microsoft "will once again deliver on our commitment to set the benchmark for console gaming." It also seems highly unlikely both next Xbox Skus will be weaker than PS5. Lockhart maybe, but Lockhart and Anaconda?According to what rumor mill? Last I heard MS was still pretty confident they'd have the power edge next round.
This.I don't get the people wanting 399. Why do you even want a ps5?
With inflation that's cheaper than the PS4 was at launch.
Suuurreee because that worked out so well for PS3.. It's nice but less important for many people than new games and features. Also price.Backwards compatibility was the key to next gen.
Why would I, Mr Casual Consumer, want to switch to Xbox or PC and lose all of my COD, Madden, and Fortnite stuff when the PS5 will play what I already own right out of the box?