[NSFW] So Bunny Ayumi is a pedophile/pedophile adjacent.
- Thread starter Hexcalibur
- Start date
I think you meant shotokan
Which is different, and specifically refers to what their fighting style is supposed be based off of
OP
OP
Content Warning & just covering my bases with the "adjacent" because some people will fight to their last breath to not consider this pedophilia.
This has always grossed me out about the anime community. And she's doing this shit publicly. Ugh.
It's telling that you're showing me this and the only thing I can say is "....So?"
Anime is an industry and medium that fetishizes and glamorizes the fetishization of little girls. All you've demonstrated is a female anime fan going the other way. It's creepy as fuck, yes, but it is also par for the course.
So I see a good number of people dragging this out and screaming "PEDOPHILE", all pretty much right after the Mike Z thing blew up, and I can't help but feel like you're either coming at this in bad faith or you're being duped by people coming at this in bad faith.
Anime is an industry and medium that fetishizes and glamorizes the fetishization of little girls. All you've demonstrated is a female anime fan going the other way. It's creepy as fuck, yes, but it is also par for the course.
So I see a good number of people dragging this out and screaming "PEDOPHILE", all pretty much right after the Mike Z thing blew up, and I can't help but feel like you're either coming at this in bad faith or you're being duped by people coming at this in bad faith.
CW is content warning, and presumably they said pedophile adjacent because she has not, at least publicly, expressed a sexual interest in actual children.
(UO___O)7
Seriously the fuck is up with people, sometimes i forget that lolicons/shotacons are a thing that unironically exists.
Unrelated to the discussion (Really) but i disagree
How old would you say this characters are? (Using official anime art) Think carefully before opening the spoiler
This forum has this strange lack of imagination that makes people not being able to understand art styles, like, i have read a lot of people here saying that the villager in Animal Crossing is a kid
When he/she is actually a functioning adult
When i saw the thread it made me think about this, actually. It's too convenient
Seriously the fuck is up with people, sometimes i forget that lolicons/shotacons are a thing that unironically exists.
Unrelated to the discussion (Really) but i disagree
How old would you say this characters are? (Using official anime art) Think carefully before opening the spoiler
The older one, Ikki, in the back, is 15 yo, the one in front and main character, Seiya, is 13
This forum has this strange lack of imagination that makes people not being able to understand art styles, like, i have read a lot of people here saying that the villager in Animal Crossing is a kid
When he/she is actually a functioning adult
When i saw the thread it made me think about this, actually. It's too convenient
(UO___O)7
Seriously the fuck is up with people, sometimes i forget that lolicons/shotacons are a thing that unironically exists.
Unrelated to the discussion (Really) but i disagree
How old would you say this characters are? (Using official anime art) Think carefully before opening the spoiler
The older one, Ikki, in the back, is 15 yo, the one in front and main character, Seiya, is 13
This forum has this strange lack of imagination that makes people not being able to understand art styles, like, i have read a lot of people here saying that the villager in Animal Crossing is a kid
When he/she is actually a functioning adult
Theres a difference between ambiguously vague and unclear drawings and characters specifically designed in detail to look and evoke a character under the age of ten.
Thanks. Up until now, I was only familiar with loli (whose hentai-fication to me always, unequivocally, felt like creation of child porn), shonen and seinen. TIL what Shota stands for.
They had 5 posts before starting this thread.
It wasn't rocket science.
Because she has not audiencie or platform here.
And it looks like the OP was an alt, so their motives here... is weird.
I'm one of those people that gets creeped out by people using the term "waify" and "husbando" with a straight face so this is some next-level bizarro for me.
Stop trying to excuse and normalize this shit. It's disgusting. This does not take away from her accusations against MikeZ.
I mean, you're not wrong, like that 10000 years old dragon trope, but it's also true that, depending on the athor, some manganimes can be very ambiguous just for the sake of it.
Sometimes is fun to find inverse versions of said trope. This is from the same anime as before (Saint Seiya), this character is Saori Kido
She's 13 too
Interesting data: Most people don't, but anime fans are stigmatized because of the shitty pedophiles
Oh shit, you're right I noticed that! Yeah, there's something fishy going on...
I was gonna ask wtf OP meant by "platforming" her. She was harassed and there was a thread about it because of the relevance of the Skullgirls designer. I fail to see how this thread is not an attempt to "debunk" her even if OP put in the obligatory "this doesn't change her harassment" phrase.
I know what you mean. This feels gross. Of course it doesn't change what MikeZ said in those DMs, but it still could influence how people view those allegations. But then again, should we ignore that Bunny Ayumi does seem to support pedophilia? Some people like myself had never heard of her before the MikeZ drama, so the allegations would necessarily put more eyes on her, so this shit was bound to come to light.
I don't know the right answer here. I kind of wish I'd never heard about either of these people.
They succumb to the overwhelming amount of fetishized kids in anime.
OP
OP
I wasn't an alt, there was a misunderstanding
Anyway
What is the point of vague stuff like this? Are we supposed to not talk about this stuff?
Anyway
What is the point of vague stuff like this? Are we supposed to not talk about this stuff?
Oh yeah, the "totally not an underage character™" is depicted to be 18yo only for this time having their underage body.Imagine saying "drawings don't have an age" with a straight face and then having in your bio "All characters are depicted 18 years of age or older. "
Fuck Mike Z, fuck Ayumi and fuck Greatm8
Reminds me of this image on the kym page of "seems legit" :
We want to talk about the grander issues of the anime industry, we wanna start dragging lolicons and shotacons left and right, we can. I'm fine with that.
I'm simply not losing sight of the fact that the only reason this is being brought up now with her is to drag and cancel her for her accusations.
????
Genuinely curious what you mean unless I'm missing something here then I apologize
Yeah what do all of you think H-art communities means? What do you think those communities are full of?
People playing dumb about the prevalence of this stuff in hentai and other rule34 content, despite the obvious popularity of hentai and rule34 artists here based on the threads created here fairly regularly, is extremely transparent. Like someone made a thread about Sakimichan being racist a few weeks ago, people were being all disappointed by that, and she draws art of underage characters regularly. Her fucking profile picture was a pinup of one of the students from Persona 5.
Anyone who has ever been to a hentai website has seen shit like this. It's gross and harmful and it's everywhere on the internet. Stop pretending to be shocked.
Ah right, we shouldn't criticize sexualising children because everyone does it and also someone else did something bad too. Got it.
Shota's been a problem in the anime community for decades. I knew some crazy fangirls back 20 years ago who were super into it. It tends to avoid larger discussion because the fans involved in that scene are generally women and girls, so through societal mental gymnastics it's considered "harmless" in sorts and there's more leeway to engage in it.
OP
OP
Like I said, I'm active in the community and the only reason I know who she is because a cosplayer I follow that got bullied for doing a Nezuok cosplay as a black woman talked about her when it happened.
I said multiple times that this shouldn't take away from Mike Z being a monumental piece of garbage. Should it just never be brought up lol?
This ain't even a year old and she says shit like this on the regular.