I still don't understand why Kingdom hearts 3 was announced for Xbox One.
Because the 360 did to the PS3 in the US what the PS4 is doing to the One globally.
Square Enix assumes this would carry through to this gen.
I still don't understand why Kingdom hearts 3 was announced for Xbox One.
You're arguing something completely different from what i am. Its not square obligation to keep adding new games if they dont see return on xbox in any form - true. But KH3 WILL RELEASE, regardless. This isn't a discussion about trying to convince KHIII to be ported - that already happened. So yes, its Square's job to support it if they want to sell well, yes.
It's definitely not going to bomb, but they're also losing out on quite a few sales by not porting at least one of the collection games over.
People in here think that you can just snap your fingers and have a port made.
KH3 comes out in about 6 months, and the team is busy finishing up everything with that. If they wanted to port something, it would have to be 1.5+2.5, anything less than that would almost be insulting to Xbox players. In that case, they would need to port over 4 entire games and get it out the door before January.
Because tons of people will buy it. TF kind of question is that?I still don't understand why Kingdom hearts 3 was announced for Xbox One.
Because tons of people will buy it. TF kind of question is that?
Probably assumed the Xbox One would do as well as the PS4 so greenlit it. I'm sure it'll still do okay, but not releasing the collection on Xbox One while the series has no history on there certainly is a headscratcher.I still don't understand why Kingdom hearts 3 was announced for Xbox One.
There is nothing to discuss and the KH Collection should have been on PS4/One to begin with.
PC isn't getting KH3 as of now and SE usually doesn't bring their big Japanese games to Steam until they have gotten most of their sales from the console market.
Its a super expensive game. Disney also has to give an OK, and Square can only use a studio near to them for the port who is busy and therefore expensive.
Why isn't this series on PC again? Not trying to port-beg, just curious since FF and and now DQ are on there and not on Xbox. Is there some sort of legal red tape?
Pretty much this.I mean, I think it's pretty clear what happened. Square announced Kingdom Hearts III for the Xbox back in 2013, before the system even came out, when they expected it to do very well in the US like the 360 did, so it made sense to target the system. Once it was clear that the PS4 was the dominant system and the Xbox One was struggling, Square basically ended all support on their Japanese side, but kept up with the games they promised for the system. I think they feel like the collections would be a waste of time on the system and are basically just publishing Kingdom Hearts III to fulfill a promise they made 5 years ago.
Buy a cheap PS3?Honestly as someone who's had a PS4 for more than a year (primarily Xbox gamer) and has the compilation game borrowed, I'm really leaning heavily on just not buying this game. How does Square expect it to sell well at all on a console where literally no one knows whats happening in the game? And a story focused game as that.
Licenses and stuffWhat a load of bull. What conversation is there to have?
We get Nier but not the KH collections? lol Thankfully I already played the PS2 games but I would love to play them again and everything else leading up to 3.
Exactly.As has been covered before, I'm pretty sure there's weird restrictions with some combination of Disney's contracts and Utada's music (and maybe Sony exclusivity?) that makes porting these games harder than they should be. I'm not sure why they have to talk about it with Microsoft though. But it's almost certainly why the series has at least skipped PC so far, while FF gets ported hard. These games are seemingly a nightmare to move from platform to platform.
Remember they were bizarrely unavailable digitally on PS3 - something Disney liked to enforce- until with PS4 they required that games be available on the PS Store. Disney owns the series, not SE.
So while I think ports are possible, there's a lot of red tape and I'd guess they'd need MS or someone to motivate them to deal with it all and help alleviate any financial annoyances that may arise as a result.
$$$I still don't understand why Kingdom hearts 3 was announced for Xbox One.
Im sure people who jump into KH3 as their first game will know Orginazation XIII, multiple vilians, relationship between characters /sKH3 will be built for new players who are diving in for the first time. On PS4 and on XBox. Just like God of War was. Getting caught up in a desire for the old games would be a mistake.
If you really want to play a Kingdom Hearts game then surely III would be the best place to start considering it is designed around this generation of machines.
The ports of the first two are for a pre-existing fanbase that asked for them. I'm not convinced they're expecting gamers to play two substantial PS2 era JRPGs before jumping in to their new game. It could easily be counter productive.
Im sure people who jump into KH3 as their first game will know Orginazation XIII, multiple vilians, relationship between characters /s
Believe me. If first timers want to understand the story, this is the game you require to know previous games context. I dont know how can people have any idea what is going on in KH3 if they dont play last entries. Heck KH3 is the direct sequel of a non-numbered game, meaning if you only play KH1 and 2 and skip rest of the series, you wont know anything in KH3.Is having such a story dependency on games that released over 13 years ago not a big mistake? Do games makers not have to be competent at having people jump into a big story at any point and be able to play from then on?
The previous games provide additional story context but they should not be necessary.
Most people who buy this on PS4 wont have played the Collection either.
So wont make much difference.
I understand but after monster hunter we have no reason to question these kind of moves. If its a big Japanese game it will do well. Let alone the fact it has disney characters.The kind of question is the fact that there never was a game for the console after 7 entries and later SE never ported the collections so I always thought why they did that without build a fanbase in the console at all.
They're just leaving money on the table and even more odd, they;re dropping in hot with a one-off with no back catalog... which is weird when they've already ported it to another console. They just did that with FF XV and honestly I think they'd have better sales if they released the previous titles on the console first, I know for sure I'd toss my wallet at the screen for that.
Where's the PC release for any of these? Switch? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Pretty much this.
Buy a cheap PS3?
Licenses and stuff
Exactly.
$$$
The collection being exclusive was a major selling point during the Sony conference. Somehow I doubt it's just a matter of Microsoft asking for it.
Like they're not gonna make a point of saying "EXCLUSIVE" at E3 and then a few month later "nevermind Phil talked to us forget about the exclusivity thing". It's a done deal, and what Nomura is saying is sounding like good old bullshit.
Hmm, so we should believe a random internet armchair analyst over Nomura himself? I'm inclined to go with the latter.
We all know Sony does whatever they can to try to keep games off their competitors consoles but you're giving them too much credit here. With so much games losing PS4 exclusivity lately and coming to Xbox (even Crash of all things) and Sony unable to even get the DMC5 world premiere (a franchise that was primarily Playstation), I don't know what leverage Sony would have to make Square ignore Microsoft here regarding an old remaster port of a franchise coming to Xbox anyway.
square just announced *two* new PS4 console exclusives, after just announcing they are finally going to port one of their exclusives to xbox. if you don't think Sony & Square would make business decisions to keep games off xbox, youre being naive. VXIII becoming multiplat XV was because development changed and Sony wasnt about to pay Square for the money they would need to recoup. Even KH3 Square announced it in 2013 when they assumed this gen would be like the last. If KH3 was annonced even a year after 2013 it wouldve most likely been exclusive. Crash was Activisions choice, and they have never made an exclusive anything. DMC4 and DmC were on Xbox so I don't know why you think xboxWe all know Sony does whatever they can to try to keep games off their competitors consoles but you're giving them too much credit here. With so much games losing PS4 exclusivity lately and coming to Xbox (even Crash of all things) and Sony unable to even get the DMC5 world premiere (a franchise that was primarily Playstation), I don't know what leverage Sony would have to make Square ignore Microsoft here regarding an old remaster port of a franchise coming to Xbox anyway.
Don't have money for a ps3, but for a Xbox One S?What if they have shit PC's and dont have the money for a PS3/PS4?