Since when Paladin Studios is first party? You mean Nintendo-published? Then it doesn't mean anything.
First party means internally developed or close (HAL, IntSys) for most gamers.
Nope, see above.
It's up for prepurchase for $40.I didn't realize they had priced it yet. The DS version was discount priced IIRC
First party means internally developed or close (HAL, IntSys) for most gamers.
Since when Paladin Studios is first party? You mean Nintendo-published? Then it doesn't mean anything.
First party means internally developed or close (HAL, IntSys) for most gamers.
Nope, see above.
I wasn't the one who said no first party games to begin with, just not stoked about what they did show. Big whoop.
I'm glad, I've been wanting Borderlands for the Switch for a while now and Bioshock and XCOM 2 releasing for the platform is cool as well.not that it means much, but the twitter response to the 2K games coming to switch is very positive.
I'm sure there will end up being a 3D World port but I'll be disappointed if that happens before Galaxy 1 + 2 HD.
not that it means much, but the twitter response to the 2K games coming to switch is very positive.
gonna try the demo. ready to be surprised tbhqh.
Clubhouse Games and Good Job! are Nintendo-owned IPs.
They are first party games.
Owning the IP doesn't mean shit, what matters to gamers are the developers behind it.
they're wrong then. a game published by a platform holder is first party. if we go by that definition fire emblem, smash, kirby, link's awakening, luigi's mansion 3, those are not 1st party either.A lot of people think internally developed when saying First Party.
Clearly not, given the numerous people in this thread calling them first party.
they're wrong then. a game published by a platform holder is first party. if we go by that definition fire emblem, smash, kirby, link's awakening, luigi's mansion 3, those are not 1st party either.
Yeah because this thread is the worldwide reference lol. Anyway, the point is no new internal Nintendo games in a while.
why does it matter if the dev is owned by nintendo or not? they're nintendo games either way.Yeah because this thread is the worldwide reference lol. Anyway, the point is no new internal Nintendo games in a while.
nope. you're just being nitpicky and moving goal posts.There's a world of difference between games made by historical Nintendo developers and newly published games by Nintendo.
this is just a nonsensical boring argument people keep having for years. everyone knows what first party games are, except some people who don't know how game development and publishing and IP and game ownership works.No one thinks a first party game has to be internally developed. If I own the IP and I own the publishing rights it's litetally mine.
Shit is ridiculous. Crafted World, Samus returns, Astral Chain and Luigi's Mansion 3 aren't 1st party now. Lmao stop.
That Xenoblade set feels like the perfect LE for me. Just an artbook without any other bits.
From the Good Job! product page:Since when Paladin Studios is first party? You mean Nintendo-published? Then it doesn't mean anything.
First party means internally developed or close (HAL, IntSys) for most gamers.
No one thinks a first party game has to be internally developed. If I own the IP and I own the publishing rights it's litetally mine.
Shit is ridiculous. Crafted World, Samus returns, Astral Chain and Luigi's Mansion 3 aren't 1st party now. Lmao stop.
Probably all delayed.Nothing new? Don't they want to show off something now that AC is out? Really weird.
why does it matter if the dev is owned by nintendo or not? they're nintendo games either way.
and animal crossing just came out, before that ring fit came out which was internally developed, and soon xenoblaDE (which is also internally developed).
Nothing new? Don't they want to show off something now that AC is out? Really weird.
Nintendo doesn't have a singular design philosophy that all its studios share.Why does it matter? Are you really asking that? So for you, Astral Chain and let's say Pikmin are both Nintendo games? Same design philosophy and so on?
Why does it matter? Are you really asking that? So for you, Astral Chain and let's say Pikmin are both Nintendo games? Same design philosophy and so on?
Holy shit, why are you still doing this despite your argument falling apart a while ago?
You can't use the "Nintendo-owned developer" argument anymore so you've moved to "design philosphy."
Yes because it's what I meant in the first place, it's my definition of first party and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
You apparently are, based on the replies you're getting while moving the goalposts with each response you give.
design philosophy? why are we talking about design philosophy? do brain age and metroid prime have the same design philosophy? (both "internally" developed)Why does it matter? Are you really asking that? So for you, Astral Chain and let's say Pikmin are both Nintendo games? Same design philosophy and so on?
you could have just said there aren't any games releasing before june that you're into, and left it at that.Yes because it's what I meant in the first place, it's my definition of first party and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Anyway, forget about the term first party if it doesn't speak to you in the same way, let's call it instead "Internally developed games or historically close studios", that's all I'm saying, no new games of that kind before June at the earliest and I find it sad.
you could have just said there aren't any games releasing before june that you're into, and left it at that.
yeah, let's.No, I really meant "Internally developed games or historically close studios", which are usually my favourites admittedly. But let's move on.
wig i know i feel that already