Thank you for the kind words. It's a 3d model, made and rendered in Autodesk 3ds Max 2020.
Link to that interview?I don't think Panos Panay wanting to rip his head off during an interview says that at all. He's a senior editor at a large tech website where he's the lead MS writer. He does get some exclusive looks at things and writes up articles for that kind of stuff but he has also developed a nice book on contacts throughout MS that he's able to tap to learn all kinds of things that MS isn't planning on making public for a while.
Of course, but we have actual leaked numbers on the Super 2080 Ti & a proper write up for Ampere, we just know RDNA 2.0 is coming.I read some rumors on news sites that AMD are to talk about RDNA 2.0 in Januaray at CES!
Has to be frustrating for Sony fans not knowing anything while MS continues to lay their cards on the table. If Sony would just provide some info to their fans it would help alleviate so much angst folks keep feeling.
Oh deary deary me! People must really have a problem with some of the standards I have. I posted my opinion, I am not looking to convince anyone, and I am not looking towards anyone to convince me otherwise.Why .
Getting hints about certain things better than reading a thread that has been wrong about almost every single fucking thing and telling people there wrong .
I can't wait for the thread to get split so we don't have this nonsense .
Ah I see. Maybe it's so good they don't want to kill their current 5700XT sales, or spoil the surprise at a big announcement. :)Of course, but we have actual leaked numbers on the Super 2080 Ti & a proper write up for Ampere, we just know RDNA 2.0 is coming.
Thank you for the kind words. It's a 3d model, made and rendered in Autodesk 3ds Max 2020.
1. No one owes you any information.I'm discussing the ORIGINAL cancellation where we had a thread full of people stating that lockhart was cancelled 6 months before Tom Warren discover so. If everyone knew why didn't they say? I find that corny
Agreed. My only critique is that it probably doesn't have enough airflow.
Oh deary deary me! People must really have a problem with some of the standards I have. I posted my opinion, I am not looking to convince anyone, and I am not looking towards anyone to convince me otherwise.
Maturity means having discernment to know when to agree to disagree. Seems some have not come to that understanding yet.
Agreed. My only critique is that it probably doesn't have enough airflow.
lol, oh boy. Said it yesterday...right before the TGA awards, earlier that day you could see the madness coming a mile away .
1. Never said anyone "owes" me anything.1. No one owes you any information.
2. Considering the consoles were years away, what difference does it make when you find this out?
3. There is a huge difference between breaking news and confirming news.
4. It's possible to believe something is the case and not feel comfortable enough in that belief to want to share it.
All that adds up to a situation were, when news comes out publicly, "insiders" might be comfortable at that point confirming the news. And then, if asked when this happened (as was asked when this news broke), they might feel comfortable sharing when they heard about it.
There is nothing illogical or "corny" there. Would you prefer to be lied to about when they believed this happened?
I think they've learned their lesson as evidenced by Pro revisions, and MS has frankly set a high bar.
Thanks for taking the time to share what you do Matt (and same for klee, tomwarren, and everyone else). It sucks that people feel so entitled and so ready to jump on anyone for not always having 100% up-to-date accurate info so they just end up being driven away.1. No one owes you any information.
2. Considering the consoles were years away, what difference does it make when you find this out?
3. There is a huge difference between breaking news and confirming news.
4. It's possible to believe something is the case and not feel comfortable enough in that belief to want to share it.
All that adds up to a situation were, when news comes out publicly, "insiders" might be comfortable at that point confirming the news. And then, if asked when this happened (as was asked when this news broke), they might feel comfortable sharing when they heard about it.
There is nothing illogical or "corny" there. Would you prefer to be lied to about when they believed this happened?
You'd hope so but I fear Sony are too image conscious. They want their products to look pretty. Which is usually a plus but it often comes with concessions.I think they've learned their lesson as evidenced by Pro revisions, and MS has frankly set a high bar.
Exactly. Especially when the doubt is usually coming from people who don't like the info.Thanks for taking the time to share what you do Matt (and same for klee, tomwarren, and everyone else). It sucks that people feel so entitled and so ready to jump on anyone for not always having 100% up-to-date accurate info so they just end up being driven away.
It's almost like the Pro revisions never happened.I think they've learned their lesson as evidenced by Pro revisions, and MS has frankly set a high bar.
On the other hand (valid for any console manufacturer) you don't want to buy another revision for fixing issues of a console you already own.
fucking choked on my drink.
Not coming at you, just trying to explain why "insiders" might be aware of something and not choose to share that information.1. Never said anyone "owes" me anything.
2. Doesn't make a world of difference i actually agree with you wasn't my argument not sure what you're getting at.
3. I absolutely agree with #3, I consider guys like Tom Warren news breakers, you're an confirmation insider which is ok. The problem occurs when people use you( not your fault) against the words of people who break news/sources.
4. I agree with #4 not sure why you decided to come at me 🤣.
As far the the rest of your conversation please see #3. Thanks
Thanks! Here's how the back looks. Not sure my port placement makes sense though.
I think they've learned their lesson as evidenced by Pro revisions, and MS has frankly set a high bar.
You'd hope so but I fear Sony are too image conscious. They want their products to look pretty. Which is usually a plus but it often comes with concessions.
Absolutely. The Pro revision definitely helped quite a bit.
I'm really excited for the first breakdown of the Series X so we can see this wind tunnel design they have going.
Let us change topic real quick
The more we get the more people seem to argue the mundane.It has nothing to do with maturity or standards but stifling the thread .
Which has happen all to often over the years for what suppose to be a speculation thread.
The more info we get the better the speculation can be right or close
Instead of people saying not possible for years .
Yeah I understand no hard feeling taken at all.Not coming at you, just trying to explain why "insiders" might be aware of something and not choose to share that information.
Hell, most are literally choosing not the share the vast majority of things they know at any given moment.
You can make form meet function. There's plenty of SFF PCs out there that can cool 400W worth of TDP across CPU/GPU without CLC/AIO coolers.
Remember Arthur Giles? Even with developer documentation in hand he got things wrong.I think that all insiders should be taken with a grain of salt. I'll never forget Kampfheld
The more we get the more people seem to argue the mundane.
I have see debates on here as to how Sony was using Navi and Microsoft was using Vega, and going to call it Navi.
I have seen debates as to how Microsoft was going to have hardware accelerated ray tracing and Sony was going to patch something up software related.
I have seen debates as to how Sony was going to use SSD, and Microsoft was not talking about it because they had not planned for it.
I am now seeing a debate about Navi FLOPS versus GCN FLOPS as if the meaning of TFLOPS changed.
I have been here and told how porting down does not happen, how much harder it is; people disappeared when I gave them more examples showing just how wrong they were.
I have seen it postulated as to how Microsoft would not know how to clock a console high, despite the fact that the last console they put out did just that.
I have been told on here that power matters more so for Microsoft is they are to be relevant. I am on record as stating that it does not. Some of us got the XB1 when it was 40% weaker, some got the PS4 Pro knowing full well that there was a console coming out that would be better to the same degree difference as base consoles.
Please tell me I am wrong.
Great job!I made another PS5 concept. This one seems better I think. Still has the V shape.
The speculation in this thread is mostly console warring, there is much that someone can learn from educated discourse from some members, but mostly? Warring and concern trolling. This is why when you say something that does not line up with people's expectations, which happens to be a rather reasonable take.......you get the responses that I got.All of that comes down to console war .( even the speculation has that lens to it sometimes )
Which is why the threads were split when they first started .
But having more info is never a bad thing when it has sources it's to bad everything end up like that.
I'm hype for the breakdown. I remember the X breakdown was really interesting, it was cool how the MOBO was upside down in the enclosure.Absolutely. The Pro revision definitely helped quite a bit.
I'm really excited for the first breakdown of the Series X so we can see this wind tunnel design they have going.
True.On the other hand (valid for any console manufacturer) you don't want to buy another revision for fixing issues of a console you already own.
I expect the inside layout of the SX to be pretty interesting and impressive.I'm hype for the breakdown. I remember the X breakdown was really interesting, it was cool how the MOBO was upside down in the enclosure.
More like, they said twice the power and never mentioned Teraflops so why are we obsessed with Teraflops instead of discussing twice the relative power.So for you to feel better about the situation Microsoft's PR should have stated the below on all marketing materials
" twice the gpu power of xbox one x*"
* please note GPU power comparison is just simple TF mathematics. 6x2= 12 . Furthermore the theoretical TF comparison between RDNA and GCN isn't exactly 1:1 due to technological advances driven by next generation RDNA technology.
I expect the inside layout of the SX to be pretty interesting and impressive.
Not coming at you, just trying to explain why "insiders" might be aware of something and not choose to share that information.
Hell, most are literally choosing not the share the vast majority of things they know at any given moment.
I hope that it isn't because I will inevitably be tempted to tear mine down to see it firsthand, and not be able to put it back together ☹️I expect the inside layout of the SX to be pretty interesting and impressive.
Look into the new Mac Pro how that is build. While I am not so happy about their CPU decisions the system itself has a impressive and very clean setup internally! It is also reported despite the power hungry components it runs really cool and silent.I hope that it isn't because I will inevitably be tempted to tear mine down to see it firsthand, and not be able to put it back together ☹
Agreed. Honestly I'm thinking of just skipping this thread and just wait till official news comes out. Tired of all the dishonest BS.The goalposts sure keep moving. People just coming to terms that the boxes will be very similar, and it will be hard to console war. They don't want to believe the truth. Everything Klee has said has planned out mostly, along with Jason has been backing up some things.
ngl, I'm tired of repeating myself to people who keep asking "Which is stronger" and "why should we believe x"
read the damn thread and you'll find out