I don't think I have been that inconsistent.the ones that obey the laws of physics which seem to change after every gonzolo leak. Next Consoles wont go over 1.5 ghz! Few months later, laws of physics are bent by the will of Cerny and 1.8 ghz becomes the law of the land.
Two months later, laws of physics are set aside as 2.0 ghz becomes the magical standard.
you are not helping lol
Oberon, because It is information that was leaked from AMD and has PS4 and PS4 Pro GPU clocks listed as previous generations and the 2000MHz for the new generation. Then Oberon has Ariel GPU, which also connects Gonzalo and flute.
I've been following this set of rumors since the first tweet that mentioned Ariel = PS5?. While it seems the most probable rumor, I don't think it's yet time to declare it "absolutely correct".
Too many posters in here convincing themselves of certain specs when nothing is certain yet. Ya'll gotta chill.
Oberon is definitely PS5 because what else would have PS4 and PS4 pro's gpu clocks listed as previous generation?!I've been following this set of rumors since the first tweet that mentioned Ariel = PS5?. While it seems the most probable rumor, I don't think it's yet time to declare it "absolutely correct".
Too many posters in here convincing themselves of certain specs when nothing is certain yet. Ya'll gotta chill.
November most likely, maybe late October, but not earlier than that.So what month are we expecting next gen to arrive? October or November, or maybe as early September?
Hope it's August :D.
Damn that's at least 14 months away :(November most likely, maybe late October, but not earlier than that.
Nah, it's pretty good.
Oh man, that's the next OT title. Ya baby!
- Tom Warren Rumor:
- Scarlett die size estimates in this very thread point to 56 CUs. Reiner said PS5 is stronger which means the PS5 also has at least 56 CUs, clocked higher to get more tflops. Which could also explain why Colin said the PS5 is DEFINITIVELY more powerful.
- 4Chan leak in April mentioned 1849 mhz clockspeed which gets us 13.2 tflops. It also lines up with the gonzolo rumor which showed 18 (or 1.8 ghz). its entirely possible that gonzolo was 1.849 this entire time and 13 tflops instead of 12.9 like we all though.
- RuthenticCookie who called the Sony E3 cancellation a week before it happened also said the PS5 is a monster. That Sony is going to lose $100. This is before months the RDNA reveal. I doubt anyone was
- Jason Schrier in this very thread said both MS and Sony were aiming to top Google's 10.7 tflops number. Again, this is BEFORE we knew about RDNA. He specifically said number.
- Then there are the more less reliable leaks, but have proven to be more correct than 99% of the people in this thread. They confirmed hardware RT and SSD months before the official confirmation when almost everyone here was laughing at that suggestion.
- The project episilon leak is riddled with errors and most likely fake, but i am surprised by how much this pastebin got right months before we knew anything. https://pastebin.com/PY9vaTsR
- No Sony at E3. - GTA6 set in Miami and NYC. (this was corroborated by another gta6 rumor a few months later) - 8k upscaling (curious how sony mentioned this) - retina tracking and wireless PSVR (someone here found a sony patent for this)
So we have 4 industry vets, 2 saying higher than 10.7 tflops, 2 saying PS5 is more powerful, plus a bunch of leaks than line up with the gonzalo leaks. But almost everyone seems to ignore all of this and had no trouble believing era insiders who created threads right after the PS5 reveal claiming the Xbox Anaconda was more powerful based on no information on PS5 tflops counts. They even ignored Brad Sams who changed his tune from MS aiming to be more powerful to simply matching Sony on performance. This was back in March.
I just find it funny that when Gonzalo was first leaked to have 1.0 ghz clock, everyone assumed a 64 CU part. 8 tflops. Then when 1.8 ghz was revealed, everyone went down to 36 CUs. Once again, 8 tflops. When Navi was revealed and it looked like 40 CU might be on the cards. And now that it has a 2.0 ghz clock, we are down to 36 CUs? We seem to downgrade the PS5 after every piece of good news. Its hilarious.
- Tom Warren Rumor:
- Scarlett die size estimates in this very thread point to 56 CUs. Reiner said PS5 is stronger which means the PS5 also has at least 56 CUs, clocked higher to get more tflops. Which could also explain why Colin said the PS5 is DEFINITIVELY more powerful.
- 4Chan leak in April mentioned 1849 mhz clockspeed which gets us 13.2 tflops. It also lines up with the gonzolo rumor which showed 18 (or 1.8 ghz). its entirely possible that gonzolo was 1.849 this entire time and 13 tflops instead of 12.9 like we all though.
- RuthenticCookie who called the Sony E3 cancellation a week before it happened also said the PS5 is a monster. That Sony is going to lose $100. This is before months the RDNA reveal. I doubt anyone was
- Jason Schrier in this very thread said both MS and Sony were aiming to top Google's 10.7 tflops number. Again, this is BEFORE we knew about RDNA. He specifically said number.
- Then there are the more less reliable leaks, but have proven to be more correct than 99% of the people in this thread. They confirmed hardware RT and SSD months before the official confirmation when almost everyone here was laughing at that suggestion.
- The project episilon leak is riddled with errors and most likely fake, but i am surprised by how much this pastebin got right months before we knew anything. https://pastebin.com/PY9vaTsR
- No Sony at E3. - GTA6 set in Miami and NYC. (this was corroborated by another gta6 rumor a few months later) - 8k upscaling (curious how sony mentioned this) - retina tracking and wireless PSVR (someone here found a sony patent for this)
So we have 4 industry vets, 2 saying higher than 10.7 tflops, 2 saying PS5 is more powerful, plus a bunch of leaks than line up with the gonzalo leaks. But almost everyone seems to ignore all of this and had no trouble believing era insiders who created threads right after the PS5 reveal claiming the Xbox Anaconda was more powerful based on no information on PS5 tflops counts. They even ignored Brad Sams who changed his tune from MS aiming to be more powerful to simply matching Sony on performance. This was back in March.
I just find it funny that when Gonzalo was first leaked to have 1.0 ghz clock, everyone assumed a 64 CU part. 8 tflops. Then when 1.8 ghz was revealed, everyone went down to 36 CUs. Once again, 8 tflops. When Navi was revealed and it looked like 40 CU might be on the cards. And now that it has a 2.0 ghz clock, we are down to 36 CUs? We seem to downgrade the PS5 after every piece of good news. Its hilarious.
Accurate, Gonzalo could be 3Ghz tomorrow and it'd still somehow wrap back around to 8-9TF with the armchair engineers talking about thermal budgets and backwards compatibility.I just find it funny that when Gonzalo was first leaked to have 1.0 ghz clock, everyone assumed a 64 CU part. 8 tflops. Then when 1.8 ghz was revealed, everyone went down to 36 CUs. Once again, 8 tflops. When Navi was revealed and it looked like 40 CU might be on the cards. And now that it has a 2.0 ghz clock, we are down to 36 CUs? We seem to downgrade the PS5 after every piece of good news. Its hilarious.
where does it say that Navi 10 can only have 56 CUs?
Does Navi 10 have RT? PS5 has RT.
Why can it have RT and not have more CUs? a 2.0 Ghz clock almost assures that its on 7nm+. 7nm+ gives 15-20% die size reduction. that should give allow them to add 56 CUs without going over 320mm2. smaller than the pro die size.
Yes. 14.2 tflops is exactly what the pastebin leak back in october mentioned. 14.3 tflops was on that hilarious project epsilon leak back in April 2018. Ruthentic cookie also hinted at 14 tflops but i cant find that post.
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen what kind of performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen what kind of performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen game what kind of final performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
Ayyyyy
EVERYONE thought the PS4 would be 10-20% more powerful than the Wii U. I was just not buying it.
Any indication of advantages one may have over the other? Bandwidth, ram etc
I'm confused as to why power draw is such a concern in this thread. What's to say these boxes won't be bigger than ever before, with a new type of cooling system that they've never used before? I say, go big or go home. I want a power-hungry beast that sucks up the juice like no console before it. The thirst is real.Ok wait... people here are expecting a 56CU (52CU active) GPU????
It hasn't occurred to some said people that the 40CU 5700XT pulls in an average of 235W while powering less RAM and components than a console will need to power? Oh and also lacking a CPU.
I mean I like throwing numbers around like the best of em... but how does anyone expect any of this to be possible?
If we take a 52CU Navi GPU and couple that with 8GB it would need at least 270W to drive that GPU alone past 1800Mhz. Now let's throw on a CPU and more ram and an SSD, and that's putting power consumption at over 300W. Now lets even assume they are using 7nm+. Thats only gonna give 15% power efficiency. That's still putting the system power draw at over 270W.
How are they gonna shave off 80-120W of power draw to fit inside console ranges?
Honestly the great thing about that is that 9.2tflops is most likely the MINIMUM we can expect for PS5 if it actually is Oberon. Given that even that would be higher in game performance than my previous predictions (Vega 56-64) and we're getting raytracing and an SSD (neither of which I thought were possible), I'm going to be thoroughly pleased with whatever the final specs are and I think most people in here will too.Accurate, Gonzalo could be 3Ghz tomorrow and it'd still somehow wrap back around to 8-9TF with the armchair engineers talking about thermal budgets and backwards compatibility.
Gonzalo/Oberon/Ariel is almost certainly PS5 but all we have on that is a clock speed that keeps changing and a vague benchmark result.
Thank you!
Anything less than 20% will be negligible. That's like saying a 3-6fps drop which can be massaged out with specific coding.Just a quick question:
What is the performance delta between the two consoles that we would deem as negligible?
7%?
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen game what kind of final performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
😎
I have no idea.....I saw the game though and...I just started laughing, it looked so fucking good.....
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen game what kind of final performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
Oh, everyone is going to be pleased no doubt. Vague speculation about teraflops and RAM is fun but nobody is going to care once we see the games which are guaranteed to look amazing.Honestly the great thing about that is that 9.2tflops is most likely the MINIMUM we can expect for PS5 if it actually is Oberon. Given that even that would be higher in game performance than my previous predictions (Vega 56-64) and we're getting raytracing and an SSD (neither of which I thought were possible), I'm going to be thoroughly pleased with whatever the final specs are and I think most people in here will too.
I agree.Early PS5 devkits were likely packing a Vega 64 or a Radeon VII - i.e. the were performance target devkits - and that's most likely where we get rumors like Warren's or Benji's from. So, 12 to 13TF, higher than the 10.7TF from Stadia.
We now know that, performance-wise, the RX 5700XT pretty much aligns with that.
I'm not gonna say anything specific, but back in June, I asked a buddy of mine who is currently working on a next Gen game what kind of final performance to expect...
PlayStation 5 is not 9.2TF.
Both it and Scarlett are greater than that...
You can choose to believe me or not, I don't care.....I'm not in the gaming industry any more so....
What ? But how does it work for PS5 as everything point to PS5 having Navi 10 with 40CUs ? this is really puzzling. They really can't overclock it above 2ghz, can they ?
Oh, everyone is going to be pleased no doubt. Vague speculation about teraflops and RAM is fun but nobody is going to care once we see the games which are guaranteed to look amazing.
Ok wait... people here are expecting a 56CU (52CU active) GPU????
It hasn't occurred to some said people that the 40CU 5700XT pulls in an average of 235W while powering less RAM and components than a console will need to power? Oh and also lacking a CPU.
I mean I like throwing numbers around like the best of em... but how does anyone expect any of this to be possible?
If we take a 52CU Navi GPU and couple that with 8GB it would need at least 270W to drive that GPU alone past 1800Mhz. Now let's throw on a CPU and more ram and an SSD, and that's putting power consumption at over 300W. Now lets even assume they are using 7nm+. Thats only gonna give 15% power efficiency. That's still putting the system power draw at over 270W.
How are they gonna shave off 80-120W of power draw to fit inside console ranges?
you saw a next gen game?I have no idea.....I saw the game though and...I just started laughing, it looked so fucking good.....
😂Ah, totally fine for me. But referring to a friend instead of your uncle sure was a missed opportunity ;).
Why can't they go above 40 CU?I agree.
What ? But how does it work for PS5 as everything point to PS5 having Navi 10 with 40CUs ? this is really puzzling. They really can't overclock it above 2ghz, can they ?
Thanks for this BTW ! You spoke AND did know something !
Could you at least tell us that the target specs are very close to each other's ? I think that would put everyone at ease as there won't be a weak baseline (currently XB1) for nextgen games !Yeah. The performance figures(once Sony and Microsoft divulge them) won't blow you away but the games will!
Navi 10 has 40 CUs.
you saw a next gen game?
Did it look better than the heretic demo?
Did it look as good as this rebirth demo?
Why can't they go over 40 though? It is semi customCould you at least tell us that the target specs are very close to each other's ? I think that would put everyone at ease as there won't be a weak baseline (currently XB1) for nextgen games !
Navi 10 has 40 CUs.
I agree.
What ? But how does it work for PS5 as everything point to PS5 being Navi 10: 40CUs ? this is really puzzling. They really can't overclock it above 2ghz, can they ?
Thanks for this BTW ! You spoke AND did know something !
Yeah. The performance figures(once Sony and Microsoft divulge them) won't blow you away but the games will!
you saw a next gen game?
Did it look better than the heretic demo?
Did it look as good as this rebirth demo?