Rayman Legends is there going for $30, sometimes $20. And it has levels from the greatest 2D platformer ever, Rayman Origins.
Rayman Legends is there going for $30, sometimes $20. And it has levels from the greatest 2D platformer ever, Rayman Origins.
The spin move is assigned to a button though.The spin move not being able to be assigned to a button and blue toad being removed is baffling. Surely both of those have to be patched at some point?
.
For whatever it's worth, Nintendo is being consistent with their own pricing. They've never dropped the MSRP, just started bundling Luigi U in. The game has technically been at 60 MSRP since its inception.Wait, it's $60? I bought it on Wii U a few weeks ago, including Luigi U, for $23.
For a Switch port, I wouldn't pay more than $40.
Sorry, but old game.
While I understand people being tired of the art style and music, this is the best in the NSMB series and a legitimately fantastic game. It's one of the best platformers this decade.
TF is obviously better, of course.
What is the better 2 player coop experience between it and Tropical Freeze?
Am I the only person that thinks Rayman is aesthetically pleasing but just simply cannot get into how the game plays.
The price is hurting this game in the reviews honestly. That and the New aesthetic fatigue. The game is brilliant, though. I agree with Jeremy Parish. He says it's the best 2D Mario.
How is it a joke? The target market for the game is towards folks that didn't buy the original game back on the Wii U, plus it's two games so that also factors into the price.
Pokemon Let's Go is a brand new game.
I don't think it's pointless. Their analysis is the most well rounded that I've seen on this game. They present their findings and give an opinion about the value of the game. In the end it seems like they feel the game is worth it for people who missed out on it the first time around while stating that the rest of us may not get as much value out of it.I just watched it and it's a good video but it is kinda pointless. It really should be a given that the port runs at 1080p@60fps without any downgrades.
Are you one of those who claimed that Splatoon 2 was a port? NSMBU wasn't a port.
As I said before in NSLU it was always the case that at least one player had to be Nabbit when playing with four players.
It's been <$30 on the Wii U for years. Also the argument that these overpriced ports being aimed at people who haven't bought the games before somehow excuses it is absurd. Only Nintendo pulls shit like this.How is it a joke? The target market for the game is towards folks that didn't buy the original game back on the Wii U, plus it's two games so that also factors into the price.
Pokemon on the 3DS was $40, and nothing about Let's Go justifies the higher price point.
Every time I see this game I hope to God Nintendo gives 2D Mario an art shake-up for the next go-around. Gimme Cuphead-like animation in this style:
The spin move is assigned to a button though.
You can press ZR to spin jump or spin while in midair.
(You can also do a mid-air spin by pressing jump a second time)
Damn, I did not know they forced P3 and P4 to play as Nabbit and Toadette. That blows. Though I can't think of many scenarios when I'd be playing this game with more than 1 other person who doesn't suck at video games, so I guess it's not the end of the world. Would probably play most of it solo anyways. Game is likely better designed that way since you can't just repeatedly fail at things and get your little bubble popped to come back in for free.
Yeah, but I'm hearing that in the base NSMB game, player 3 and 4 are now forced to be Toadette and Nabit with their special abilities. They removed the toads which were effectively reskins it Mario.
In NSLU it isn't as offensive because the game is so tough it's more or less designed for one, maybe two players.
It's too bad NSMBU doesn't atleast give the option for Player 3/4 to play as regular toads, or atleast Toadette/Nabbit minus the abilities. I'm not sure why Nintendo enforces this crap sometimes.
Every time I see this game I hope to God Nintendo gives 2D Mario an art shake-up for the next go-around. Gimme Cuphead-like animation in this style:
Pokemon on the 3DS was $40, and nothing about Let's Go justifies the higher price point.
SMM shows what kind of insane and clever levels people can make with the toolkit that puts U's levels to shame.
I feel Super Mario Maker and the later reception of Tropical Freeze have ruined New Super Mario U overtime. SMM shows what kind of insane and clever levels people can make with the toolkit that puts U's levels to shame. TF got a mostly positive reception with people preaching it's great design then. But I feel the Switch port of it has gotten more attention and many more people are warming up to TF's design and claiming that TF is one of the greatest 2D platformers out there. I mean, Gamespot went from giving TF a 6 to a 9 for the Wii U and Switch versions respectively. Seems like Tropical Freeze and SMM all are making NSMBU look safe and mundane in comparison.
No way. The toolkit in SMM isn't even flexible enough to make MANY of the stages in NSMBU
I never understand when people play devil's advocate like this. Yeah obviously if nintendo can get away with charging people for barebones online and 60 dollar ports with minimal content of course they will. Any company would.
But some companies are doing full on remakes/remasters for half the price. Its fair to criticize the blatant greed.
No, but even with those limitations plenty of people found a way to make way more interesting stages than Nintendo did with NSMBU across all the different Mario tile-sets .
CRAP.
From a definite pick-up to a hard pass. The reviews have done nothing to persuade me to keep my pre-order. The lifeless game design choices I keep seeing reviewers talk about over and over is truly disappointing. Seems like a swing-and-a-miss from Nintendo. Surprised actually. This series rocked it back in the day.
No, but even with those limitations plenty of people found a way to make way more interesting stages than Nintendo did with NSMBU across all the different Mario tile-sets .
They do it because they think they make more money by selling more than double at half price. Nintendo thinks differently and they are probably right. Both strategies are to maximize profits.
Interesting does not mean good. Mario Maker levels do not approach the Polish on display in this game.
The game is arguably the best 2d Mario game. It's not a swing and a Miss.
For whatever it's worth, Nintendo is being consistent with their own pricing. They've never dropped the MSRP, just started bundling Luigi U in. The game has technically been at 60 MSRP since its inception.
Also the argument that these overpriced ports being aimed at people who haven't bought the games before somehow excuses it is absurd. Only Nintendo pulls shit like this.
Pokemon on the 3DS was $40, and nothing about Let's Go justifies the higher price point.
I personally enjoy NSMBU but there's some rather baffling design decisions in this port. I don't understand why Toadette and Nabbit are mandatory multiplayer characters if you're playing with four people and why you can't toggle their handicaps off. Why can't all players play by the same rules?
Have you never played the Wii U version?CRAP.
From a definite pick-up to a hard pass. The reviews have done nothing to persuade me to keep my pre-order. The lifeless game design choices I keep seeing reviewers talk about over and over is truly disappointing. Seems like a swing-and-a-miss from Nintendo. Surprised actually. This series rocked it back in the day.
All right, not too bad then. Adding blue toad back in would indeed be nice though and I can't imagine why they removed him other than to appear more diverse, even though the female character is of course ultra handicapped.Not completely true, In NSMBU you can avoid using both as the other three players can be Mario, Luigi and Yellow Toad, it's forced ONLY in NSLU though Mario is unavailable in that one.