I don't know what's more sad that your mom believes that or there are people in this thread who believe the moon actually exists.
Sure, let me clarify. So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.I'm a bit confused: are you saying that current Jehovah's Witness teaching is that evolution is real or could be real? If so that's huge: that's what initially caused me to leave the faith. Of course now there are a myriad of other things keeping me away and I'm now an atheist, but it would be very interesting if JWs truly abandoned this thought that caused me so much anguish as a child
But. Your comment isn't exactly clear if things have officially changed from the top. You say they no longer believe in creationism but even as a child I remember them saying that their belief isn't creationism even though the only difference was that they didn't teach the world as being only a few thousand years old.
So, just curious what the current status of jw teaching on evolution actually is.
Sure, let me clarify. So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.
We're committed to upholding the essential, fundamental truths of the Bible. This includes the truth that God created the universe, life, and man in his image. But when and how he did so is not started in the Bible. We do not agree with the popular consensus that blind chance could create the first life or the vast variety of living things today as Darwinism would suggest. We do, however, believe that evolution occurs within different Biblical "kinds" of living things. However, what a "kind" actually is we do not really know, but we believe it to be a very broad term.
It is up to science to uncover those answers. JWs only require their members to be united on the essential doctrines, not on secondary or tertiary teachings. Case in point, there are many Witnesses who accept the teaching of evolution, but they also believe that it required God to initiate it or even direct it in some way. Their belief in evolution does not invalidate their Christian unity because it is a secondary or even tertiary teaching, not a prime or essential teaching.
HOWEVER, in some cases (perhaps your mom), evolution can still be a buzz word. Some, with the best intentions, still remember or hold to some of the literature which was written in the 80s and what not. Not saying that's the case, but could be a possibility and a misunderstanding.
in a Slack for a professional association, someone posted a comic about how we tamed wolves and turned them into pugs in the memes channel. someone gave a "I wish no ill upon anyone but I have found the culture of this organization is at conflict with my Christian beliefs and my dedication to my Lord, Jesus Christ. i would like to withdraw membership from the association and the Slack"
While true they have recently slowed their scientific commentary they have still in recent times continued on the creation vs evolution crusade. In March 2014 they published an article "The untold story of creation". In 2010 JWs published 2 companion brochures "The Origin of Life - Five Questions Worth Asking" and "Was Life Created?"So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.
This is at least a very rosy and perhaps misleading way to describe the way JWs view differences in opinion about doctrine, teachings, and theology by its members.JWs only require their members to be united on the essential doctrines, not on secondary or tertiary teachings.
Even if this is the case and she is spouting old ideas no longer espoused by the JW organization (I believe the leadership DOES still espouse mostly rigid creationist beliefs), they still hold responsibility for hardening the minds of their members against ideas like evolution. The JW organization has for decades and decades released a number of books and articles regarding the origins of the universe and life, all of a poor scientific standard. Theories of abiogenesis and evolution are often (knowingly or unknowingly) misrepresented. Very often citations and sources are misquoted or only quoted in part that betray the intended intention of the source. All this to push creationist ideas while at the same time to belittle theories and ideas of evolution and natural selection.HOWEVER, in some cases (perhaps your mom), evolution can still be a buzz word. Some, with the best intentions, still remember or hold to some of the literature which was written in the 80s and what not.
Another story from mormon Utah, had a friend once tell me that the reason dinosaur fossils are here is because when god made this planet he used bits of other planets that just had dinosaur bones in them.
The variety of life didn't happen by blind chance though. Maybe you didn't mean that quite as literally as the sentence says, but it's good to be clear about this as that is actually a common misconception about evolution among believers particularly.We do not agree with the popular consensus that blind chance could create the first life or the vast variety of living things today as Darwinism would suggest.
So dinosaurs lived and died before mankind, and we know of their existence due to the fossils that they left behind...but they're also aliens?
Well, that just sounds like paleontology with extra steps.
When I was wanting to debunk creationist arguments I was going through Creationist YouTube to see what kinds of things they believed in.Creationists tend to combine big bang, abiogenesis and evolution into one big scientific theory they call evolution.
Or that's how I remember them from way back when Creationists vs. Skeptics was the main topic on early YouTube.
As much as I enjoy some of the super funny responses, I mostly feel very sad and also sorry for you. Having a family member that is so "detached" and seemingly also in a mental state where she feels the need to show anger torwards you, because you disagree about her take is bad. Our family had something similar (not related to religion, but still) and this escalated in a way that some of our family members totally detached themselves. Hope you will find a way through that.
Is your mom my mom? She is also in Kansas and says shit like this. My step-dad once told me that dinosaurs are not real and that the bones were planted there to test the faith of true Christians. It is pretty wacky.
When I was a little kid, I was told that Satan put the fossils in the ground to trick us (my family was part of a very religious, conservative cult). I was maybe 7-8 years old, and still couldn't believe it. The minds of creationists are something else...I tried that once. The woman got pissed and said God would never "deceive" us like that.
Then literally a few minutes later she claimed fossils only appeared to be as old as they were because God made them appear that way to "test" us and see who remained faithful in the truth that earth was only 6000 years old.
In other words, God deceived us...
This is at least a very rosy and perhaps misleading way to describe the way JWs view differences in opinion about doctrine, teachings, and theology by its members
The JW organization has for decades and decades released a number of books and articles regarding the origins of the universe and life, all of a poor scientific standard
First thanks for replying! You have a very liberal and non-rigid view of JW theology. As cool as that is, I bet you represent a small minority within the denomination. A lot of people I care about are still JWs and it's my hope that in the future they soften their views on many different things. I fear they will only become more rigid.My paleontologist JW friend and I have had conversations exactly about this topic and he himself has experienced it. Him and I both believe the Flood was localized, and that very likely that Adam and Eve lived alongside Neanderthal. People can be very slow to change, and any JW who says we're perfect and know all the answers is being disgenious.
You have a very liberal and non-rigid view of JW theology. As cool as that is, I bet you represent a small minority within the denomination
Thanks for sharing. Hey since this is our second interchange, you can call me a return visit… if you care about that sort of thing ;) hahaha