subpar spatula

Refuses to Wash his Ass
Member
Oct 26, 2017
22,693
I don't know what's more sad that your mom believes that or there are people in this thread who believe the moon actually exists.
 

TheArbiter

Member
Jan 21, 2023
110
Chicago, IL
I'm a bit confused: are you saying that current Jehovah's Witness teaching is that evolution is real or could be real? If so that's huge: that's what initially caused me to leave the faith. Of course now there are a myriad of other things keeping me away and I'm now an atheist, but it would be very interesting if JWs truly abandoned this thought that caused me so much anguish as a child

But. Your comment isn't exactly clear if things have officially changed from the top. You say they no longer believe in creationism but even as a child I remember them saying that their belief isn't creationism even though the only difference was that they didn't teach the world as being only a few thousand years old.

So, just curious what the current status of jw teaching on evolution actually is.
Sure, let me clarify. So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.

We're committed to upholding the essential, fundamental truths of the Bible. This includes the truth that God created the universe, life, and man in his image. But when and how he did so is not started in the Bible. We do not agree with the popular consensus that blind chance could create the first life or the vast variety of living things today as Darwinism would suggest. We do, however, believe that evolution occurs within different Biblical "kinds" of living things. However, what a "kind" actually is we do not really know, but we believe it to be a very broad term.

It is up to science to uncover those answers. JWs only require their members to be united on the essential doctrines, not on secondary or tertiary teachings. Case in point, there are many Witnesses who accept the teaching of evolution, but they also believe that it required God to initiate it or even direct it in some way. Their belief in evolution does not invalidate their Christian unity because it is a secondary or even tertiary teaching, not a prime or essential teaching.

HOWEVER, in some cases (perhaps your mom), evolution can still be a buzz word. Some, with the best intentions, still remember or hold to some of the literature which was written in the 80s and what not. Not saying that's the case, but could be a possibility and a misunderstanding.
 
OP
OP
Bentendo24

Bentendo24

Member
Feb 20, 2020
6,061
Sure, let me clarify. So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.

We're committed to upholding the essential, fundamental truths of the Bible. This includes the truth that God created the universe, life, and man in his image. But when and how he did so is not started in the Bible. We do not agree with the popular consensus that blind chance could create the first life or the vast variety of living things today as Darwinism would suggest. We do, however, believe that evolution occurs within different Biblical "kinds" of living things. However, what a "kind" actually is we do not really know, but we believe it to be a very broad term.

It is up to science to uncover those answers. JWs only require their members to be united on the essential doctrines, not on secondary or tertiary teachings. Case in point, there are many Witnesses who accept the teaching of evolution, but they also believe that it required God to initiate it or even direct it in some way. Their belief in evolution does not invalidate their Christian unity because it is a secondary or even tertiary teaching, not a prime or essential teaching.

HOWEVER, in some cases (perhaps your mom), evolution can still be a buzz word. Some, with the best intentions, still remember or hold to some of the literature which was written in the 80s and what not. Not saying that's the case, but could be a possibility and a misunderstanding.

I think in my mom's case she literally just doesn't know what evolution is and associates anything atheistic with evolution which, as you've said, the two don't have to go hand in hand

Thanks for responding
 

Orayn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,839
I still completely disagree with "God created the universe using scientific processes" but I can at least have a conversation with someone who's on the same page about how reality works for the most part.
 

Billfisto

Member
Oct 30, 2017
16,356
Canada
in a Slack for a professional association, someone posted a comic about how we tamed wolves and turned them into pugs in the memes channel. someone gave a "I wish no ill upon anyone but I have found the culture of this organization is at conflict with my Christian beliefs and my dedication to my Lord, Jesus Christ. i would like to withdraw membership from the association and the Slack"

That's bizarre. Even the most hard-core creationists I've seen have the "kinds" bullshit that they resort to.

Did they think that pugs just sprung onto the earth, perfectly formed? How on earth did they survive?
 

The Maestro

Member
Feb 12, 2018
119
So most of our literature now or articles that come out online about creation, evolution, or other aspects shy away from commenting on scientific matters.
While true they have recently slowed their scientific commentary they have still in recent times continued on the creation vs evolution crusade. In March 2014 they published an article "The untold story of creation". In 2010 JWs published 2 companion brochures "The Origin of Life - Five Questions Worth Asking" and "Was Life Created?"
These like the older material on the subject are meant to push creationist ideas in the minds of the readers.

JWs only require their members to be united on the essential doctrines, not on secondary or tertiary teachings.
This is at least a very rosy and perhaps misleading way to describe the way JWs view differences in opinion about doctrine, teachings, and theology by its members.

What would happen if you spoke to the elders about the idea that the human race is more than 6000 years old. Showed them mountains of evidence of ancient Neolithic cultures that long predate the Bible's own derived date for the creation of "Adam"?

What would happen if you told the elders you didn't believe the flood literally covered the entire planet and killed all life except for what was on the ark? Showed them scientific evidence that proves this to be a physical impossibility?

These sorts of ideas would create problems for you. If you kept it up they could get you shunned by other members.

HOWEVER, in some cases (perhaps your mom), evolution can still be a buzz word. Some, with the best intentions, still remember or hold to some of the literature which was written in the 80s and what not.
Even if this is the case and she is spouting old ideas no longer espoused by the JW organization (I believe the leadership DOES still espouse mostly rigid creationist beliefs), they still hold responsibility for hardening the minds of their members against ideas like evolution. The JW organization has for decades and decades released a number of books and articles regarding the origins of the universe and life, all of a poor scientific standard. Theories of abiogenesis and evolution are often (knowingly or unknowingly) misrepresented. Very often citations and sources are misquoted or only quoted in part that betray the intended intention of the source. All this to push creationist ideas while at the same time to belittle theories and ideas of evolution and natural selection.
 

Sayuz

Member
Apr 29, 2019
1,021
Another story from mormon Utah, had a friend once tell me that the reason dinosaur fossils are here is because when god made this planet he used bits of other planets that just had dinosaur bones in them.

So dinosaurs lived and died before mankind, and we know of their existence due to the fossils that they left behind...but they're also aliens?

Well, that just sounds like paleontology with extra steps.

MV5BZjMwZmM5N2EtMDUyYi00NmM0LTlkYTItYWExOTY3NTUxYTY2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTAyODkwOQ@@._V1_FMjpg_UX1920_.jpg
 
Oct 27, 2017
1,164
Finland
We do not agree with the popular consensus that blind chance could create the first life or the vast variety of living things today as Darwinism would suggest.
The variety of life didn't happen by blind chance though. Maybe you didn't mean that quite as literally as the sentence says, but it's good to be clear about this as that is actually a common misconception about evolution among believers particularly.
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
8,454
So dinosaurs lived and died before mankind, and we know of their existence due to the fossils that they left behind...but they're also aliens?

Well, that just sounds like paleontology with extra steps.

MV5BZjMwZmM5N2EtMDUyYi00NmM0LTlkYTItYWExOTY3NTUxYTY2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTAyODkwOQ@@._V1_FMjpg_UX1920_.jpg

Yeah lol. I dunno why they need to explain it away. Mormons don't even really teach that the earth isn't old or anything (Its hard to say because with the whole "personal revelation stuff" in my experience you randomly run into folks who believe all kinds of shit you never heard of and swear is gospel) so I don't know why he needed to believe that dinosaurs never lived on this planet or why them being building blocks for this planet was satisfying.
 

Gameflow

Member
Apr 14, 2022
371
As much as I enjoy some of the super funny responses, I mostly feel very sad and also sorry for you. Having a family member that is so "detached" and seemingly also in a mental state where she feels the need to show anger torwards you, because you disagree about her take is bad. Our family had something similar (not related to religion, but still) and this escalated in a way that some of our family members totally detached themselves. Hope you will find a way through that.
 

the-pi-guy

Member
Oct 29, 2017
6,448
Creationists tend to combine big bang, abiogenesis and evolution into one big scientific theory they call evolution.

Or that's how I remember them from way back when Creationists vs. Skeptics was the main topic on early YouTube.
When I was wanting to debunk creationist arguments I was going through Creationist YouTube to see what kinds of things they believed in.

One of the craziest to me was this one charlatan in particular that I recall combined like 7 wildly things from "star evolution", "abiogenesis", and some others.

From what I recall, he went around the country giving this same talk.

Creationists don't seem to view Evolution as some solitary theory, but rather the foundation of an entire worldview.
 

Mcfrank

Member
Oct 28, 2017
16,581
Is your mom my mom? She is also in Kansas and says shit like this. My step-dad once told me that dinosaurs are not real and that the bones were planted there to test the faith of true Christians. It is pretty wacky.
 
OP
OP
Bentendo24

Bentendo24

Member
Feb 20, 2020
6,061
As much as I enjoy some of the super funny responses, I mostly feel very sad and also sorry for you. Having a family member that is so "detached" and seemingly also in a mental state where she feels the need to show anger torwards you, because you disagree about her take is bad. Our family had something similar (not related to religion, but still) and this escalated in a way that some of our family members totally detached themselves. Hope you will find a way through that.

Don't feel sorry. Overall my life is amazing, I love my kind mom, and have only a little bitterness for the childhood I had while still realizing that it made me who I am today and I wouldn't change a thing.

My dad is reasonable enough to keep my mom in check when it comes to indoctrinating my kids, so I'm not terribly worried about that. My kid, like others have said, is also a huge snitch so I would find out with relative ease
 
OP
OP
Bentendo24

Bentendo24

Member
Feb 20, 2020
6,061
Is your mom my mom? She is also in Kansas and says shit like this. My step-dad once told me that dinosaurs are not real and that the bones were planted there to test the faith of true Christians. It is pretty wacky.

I've only met one Witness in my life who didn't believe in dinosaurs and she was an extremely old lady with a very poor education from a poor country. Thankfully I was never taught that dinos didn't exist, since JWs believe (or not as our resident jw says) in a pseudo version of creation that doesn't include earth only existing for six thousand years.
 

JediMasterMatt

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
708
I always recommend just doubling down on the crazy and go one step deeper to make them the ones that feel they are missing out and you are enlightening them. For any lunar conspiracies, simply roll your eyes and say: "So, you are one of THOSE that believes in the moon?" Then walk away.
 

Nocturnowl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,359
337.png

Hmm, well this guy still doesn't have an evolution, maybe there's something here...
Yet moon stones cause evolution...

OP we have a conundrum
 

sakkeke

Member
Oct 16, 2021
399
Finland
I tried that once. The woman got pissed and said God would never "deceive" us like that.

Then literally a few minutes later she claimed fossils only appeared to be as old as they were because God made them appear that way to "test" us and see who remained faithful in the truth that earth was only 6000 years old.

In other words, God deceived us...
When I was a little kid, I was told that Satan put the fossils in the ground to trick us (my family was part of a very religious, conservative cult). I was maybe 7-8 years old, and still couldn't believe it. The minds of creationists are something else...
 

TheArbiter

Member
Jan 21, 2023
110
Chicago, IL
This is at least a very rosy and perhaps misleading way to describe the way JWs view differences in opinion about doctrine, teachings, and theology by its members

Rosy, is probably the right word, and I understand your point. My paleontologist JW friend and I have had conversations exactly about this topic and he himself has experienced it. Him and I both believe the Flood was localized, and that very likely that Adam and Eve lived alongside Neanderthal. People can be very slow to change, and any JW who says we're perfect and know all the answers is being disgenious. There is so much to the scientific world that we have yet to discover. Individuals are always going to have differing opinions on things - some may be more outspoken about them then others. And sure in some cases - maybe an Elder or someone else may think your crazy for believing that or making crazy talk. In my experience you just learn who you can have those conversations with and you can't, some are just more sensiitve and unfortunately close-minded. But at the end of the day - if one JW believes that God used evolution to create living things and one doesn't - that doesn't invalidate their faith in a living Creator (even if one is objectively wrong :P)

The JW organization has for decades and decades released a number of books and articles regarding the origins of the universe and life, all of a poor scientific standard

Which is why I say as of late we let science do the talking when it comes to the how. The publications in the past were of a poor scientific standard, and unfortunately people that are not scientifically inclined, still hold onto those even though they are vastly outdated on many levels. Which brings it back to the previous quote. Sometimes it's a slow circle.
 

The Maestro

Member
Feb 12, 2018
119
My paleontologist JW friend and I have had conversations exactly about this topic and he himself has experienced it. Him and I both believe the Flood was localized, and that very likely that Adam and Eve lived alongside Neanderthal. People can be very slow to change, and any JW who says we're perfect and know all the answers is being disgenious.
First thanks for replying! You have a very liberal and non-rigid view of JW theology. As cool as that is, I bet you represent a small minority within the denomination. A lot of people I care about are still JWs and it's my hope that in the future they soften their views on many different things. I fear they will only become more rigid.

You certainly have interesting views for a JW. Thanks for sharing. Hey since this is our second interchange, you can call me a return visit… if you care about that sort of thing ;) hahaha
 

TheArbiter

Member
Jan 21, 2023
110
Chicago, IL
You have a very liberal and non-rigid view of JW theology. As cool as that is, I bet you represent a small minority within the denomination

I don't think your assessment is too far off, but I'd also say that you might be surprised by how many differing views you may encounter among us on that subject. The best kept secret of JWs is that you do not need to believe everything that JWs teach to be a JW lol. And what I mean by that is for a person to get baptized they have to accept the essential teachings. Believing in a Creator who has a personal name and his son Jesus is essential. How he created everything is not. To quote my Paleontologist friend:

"If you personally decided through your own Bible study that evolution is true, that Jesus died on a cross, that mankind is 200,000 years old, or whatever, that's perfectly fine. As long as you apply Christian principles like 1 Corinthians 10:23, 24."

A person wouldnt publicly teach these views, because they aren't fundamental teachings. We try to live our lives by what the Bible says to the best of our ability, because that covers the basis for the moral principles. But science has nothing to do with morals.

Which brings up the secondary aspect of this, which really comes down to each person and what gives them "faith", in relation to the Creation and Evolution topic. Some people take things at face value, others aren't simply ggoing to go off of "because the Bible says so." For my JW Paleontologist, science actually gave him faith in a Creator, and that's because he wanted to search out those answers. Others may be content with a very simple and limited view. And that's perfectly OK- buuuuut that can lead to some frustrating conversations no doubt. Or course this is just my perspective.

Thanks for sharing. Hey since this is our second interchange, you can call me a return visit… if you care about that sort of thing ;) hahaha

Of course! I appreciate the conversation. . Lol and maybe 😄
 
Last edited: