Also, the good news is that she got her boobs fixed. Remember how her boobs looked just like Sarah Huckabee Sanders' eyes? That's been corrected.
It's about what I expect from a radio jockey.I get her frustration. Like, your opening question is about someone's breast implant being ruptured? What do you expect?
Oh, totally. But if she went into the interview expecting not to be questioned by an aspiring Howard Stern shock-jock I can completely understand why his bullshit opening rings as nothing more than an attempt to diminish and ridicule her. And then he's baffled that she didn't giggle in falsetto and play along.
WELCOME TO THE BONE ZONELook, when you were in adult film and call a radio station called The Bone...
i guess because of the reactions?
Umm, I'd say if you are bringing her on your show to talk about sports analysis, then bring her on based on the quality of her analysis. If that's not your intent, be upfront about how the point of bringing her on your show is to make a spectacle of her prior profession as an adult film actress. And if you feel her sports analysis is below average, then just don't bring her on and avoid all this. Is any of that unreasonable or complicated?How was the host supposed to introduce her if he couldn't mention the one thing she became famous for?
I thought this on first reaction abut after reading her tweet it appears that she was brought on - at least in part - to discuss her breast implant getting hit by a puck and needing to have surgery.Umm, I'd say if you are bringing her on your show to talk about sports analysis, then bring her on based on the quality of her analysis. If that's not your intent, be upfront about how the point of bringing her on your show is to make a spectacle of her prior profession as an adult film actress. And if you feel her sports analysis is below average, then just don't bring her on and avoid all this. Is any of that unreasonable or complicated?
Umm, I'd say if you are bringing her on your show to talk about sports analysis, then bring her on based on the quality of her analysis. If that's not your intent, be upfront about how the point of bringing her on your show is to make a spectacle of her prior profession as an adult film actress. And if you feel her sports analysis is below average, then just don't bring her on and avoid all this. Is any of that unreasonable or complicated?
I just don't know how to listen to that guy's introduction and hear it as anything other than "Our guest used to act in pornographic videos. She does sports stuff now but she used to be filmed having sex. It's not every day you get to talk to someone who got paid money to have sex. And then her boob exploded. Anyway, hi Mia." I would hate being made a spectacle of on any show in which I'm supposed to be a guest.I thought this on first reaction abut after reading her tweet it appears that she was brought on - at least in part - to discuss her breast implant getting hit by a puck and needing to have surgery.
It's almost like she's suggesting she herself is vapid.
his cats are probably the ones least concerned out of all of us with what she said.
I changed what I posted because there's probably more context to that which I'm not aware of.It's almost like she's suggesting she herself is vapid.
Sometimes needlessly insulting another has its consequences.
Look, when you were in adult film and call a radio station called The Bone...
I just don't know how to listen to that guy's introduction and hear it as anything other than "Our guest used to act in pornographic videos. She does sports stuff now but she used to be filmed having sex. It's not every day you get to talk to someone who got paid money to have sex. And then her boob exploded. Anyway, hi Mia." I would hate being made a spectacle of on any show in which I'm supposed to be a guest.
-applies to Bonafide's question as well.
What did this woman do that makes her think she can throw the n-word around like that?
...oh, right.
i'm guessing mia khalifa videos are still top trending on porn hub or whatever, hell i didn't even know she was 'retired' yet
Just seems disrespectful to me in a context that clearly seems to indicate they brought her on to interview her as a sports analyst and not as a former adult film actress. I guess people just agree with that or they don't.im probably just talking for myself on this one. but i dont see a problem with the way they introduced her. she was a porn star, the only reason people know of her is that she was a pretty famous porn star. her having an issue with people knowing that and bringing it up is her problem, i could see if they had an agreement not to talk about it and he did it anyway but i dont think thats what happened.
tl;dr: stand on your square. if she had played it off and kept the discussion to sports she wouldnt look as crazy as she does now.
did this woman lay with Beastman, and was she sullied by Beast blood, and now can perform their magical dance steps and popular musical art forms?What did this woman do that makes her think she can throw the n-word around like that?
...oh, right.
Just seems disrespectful to me in a context that clearly seems to indicate they brought her on to interview her as a sports analyst and not as a former adult film actress. I guess people just agree with that or they don't.
I just don't know how to listen to that guy's introduction and hear it as anything other than "Our guest used to act in pornographic videos. She does sports stuff now but she used to be filmed having sex. It's not every day you get to talk to someone who got paid money to have sex. And then her boob exploded. Anyway, hi Mia." I would hate being made a spectacle of on any show in which I'm supposed to be a guest.
-applies to Bonafide's question as well.
I can find being an adult film star to be a dignified job while recognizing that other people who talk about the profession don't agree that it is. If her past job was a CPA, her introduction would have been very different. The radio host has a fascination with her prior profession as a person who fucks people for money. Just replace every instance of him mentioning her adult film career with him mentioning that she used to be a CPA and tell me it wouldn't sound incredibly, incredibly weird.it's only disrespectful if you think being a porn star is a disgraceful job. her not being to come to terms with whatever demons she has with her past isnt the radio guys fault imo.
i could see it if they kept wanting to relentlessly refer back to it throughout the interview but nothing like that happened.
You're inserting your own words and getting too into your own feelings about what he actually said and thus you're making it appear way worse than what it actually was in the video.
While I do think the radio host needs work on introductions and while I also feel Mia overreacted, the real blame goes to the individuals who set up this interview behind the scenes. It should have been explicitly stated from either her agent or their PR person that she didn't want any mention of that part of her life. Instead, someone dropped the ball and both the radio host and Mia look like fools.