...I'll be in my bunk. This is downright unworldly.
...I'll be in my bunk. This is downright unworldly.
Oh shit.
Any spoilers in their review? Wanna watch theirs but I don't wanna get spoiled of course.
FortniteSo GOTY nominations at TGA this year so far - Monster Hunter World, God of War, Spider-man?
Everyone seems to be expecting RDR2 so it's probably going to be in.
That leaves the last spot and I'm not sure what it would be- SotC remake? Far Cry 5? Detroit?
Cool!Yeah I mentioned that in the pre-laod thread: https://www.resetera.com/threads/spider-man-preload-46-225-gb-is-up.66472/page-4#post-12297720
It was annoucned officially there by Insomniac but not time window for its release yet.
Ah, I see. Still! Very happy to hear them loving it so much.He's not the one who reviews it actually, that's Brandon Jones and going by the score he loved it as well. I haven't watched their review though for fear of spoilers, this was said in the weekly podcast.
The way I see it, is that general consensus and aggregate doesn't matter on an individual level. So many of these reactions and your comment is basically judging the validity of reviews purely by score and how that score compares to general consensus. But score isn't what decides if something is a troll or contrarian; the text of the review does. If a review describes why the person felt the way they did and is logical and well-argued, then a score is legitimate. That's the only thing that matters.
Furthermore, reviews shouldn't be "a good representation of a product"; they should be a good representation of how that reviewer feels, how or why it impacts them. Consider Tom Chick and Agents of Mayhem. People were calling his opinions on the game as being contrarian because the game got mixed reviews and he felt it was his game of the year. On the surface, contrarian; the general consensus says that game isn't that good. But the text of the review succinctly explains why the game resonated with him and why he felt strongly about it. The score is justified. It was very a personal perspective, rather than a product review. That's a good review IMO. That's what reviews should strive to be
Another example would be the perfect Essential review for Never Alone from Eurogamer. The game's Inupiat themes and narrative and imagery deeply resonated with the reviewer and his cultural roots. But the game has low 70s aggregate scores on Metacritic. Why is that kind of review not considered contrarian, when the reasons for such a high score are very personal and subjective for the individual reviewer?
While some might be quick to point out 87 as being rather low for a GOTY contender, I do think the sheer number of 9s and 10s is worth noting. It's the plethora of random 7s that really brought it down. So I definitely think it should be considered.So GOTY nominations at TGA this year so far - Monster Hunter World, God of War, Spider-man?
Everyone seems to be expecting RDR2 so it's probably going to be in.
That leaves the last spot and I'm not sure what it would be- SotC remake? Far Cry 5? Detroit?
In what universe is a pop tart better than a toaster strudel??Just throwing this out there for those that follow Easy Allies, Kyle Bosman had a segment on the latest podcast where they talk about upcoming games. He called it pop tart or toaster strudel, pop tart means they want it bad and toaster strudel they don't care for it really. So anyway, he said that this was the most delicious pop tart he has had this year and he can't see anything else topping it.
Yep. It will settle at a 86 in the end. 5 from Gamecritics incoming.The dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
RipThe dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
Holy fucking shit but these are almost definitely on the Pro so I shouldn't get too excited.
CGI looking pretty good for 04. I gotta rewatch this.The dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
THE GOAT
I don't think that particular moment is CG. Just sped up footage with practical effect for the metal arm.
There's where we're going to disagree. "Objective" quality should have absolutely no bearing on a review. It should be 100% subjective. If a game isn't your cup of tea, then a review should reflect that honestly. There shouldn't be some rating floor because simply because of quality.It's not about an individual review score here or there, but what the broader context of the site's review scores represent. Somebody posted a list of AAA game's and well received DLC for AAA games that GameCritic has reviewed, and while an occasional harsh score for these wouldn't raise an eyebrow to see that many very well regarded games score that lowly, it makes it hard to take the site seriously. This is especially true since if it was one person, like Quartertothree, you can say that individual just judges games very harshly. But when a site with multiple reviewers judges games consistently far harsher, then it seems as if the site either seeks out reviewers who have a tendency to judge games harshly or its a mandate - considering the site doesn't award scores on their own site but gives a score to Metacritic, it certainly strains credulity that there aren't ulterior motives.
Add in being more positive towards smaller games, and while circumstantial it's one more thing that makes me question the site.
So it's not a matter of an outlier, but rather a pattern. If a reviewer consistently is much harsher for the most popular games, then I don't know how valid that person's opinion is. Reviews are subjective, but there should be a level of objective quality obvious even if a certain type of game isn't for you, or if a blockbuster AAA isn't really your cup of tea. Does that make sense?
Doom (2016) got GOTYs and it was at an 85 I think. Spider-man will definitely get one atleast. The 6 from Guardian wrecked any chance it had of being at 89-90.While some might be quick to point out 87 as being rather low for a GOTY contender, I do think the sheer number of 9s and 10s is worth noting. It's the plethora of random 7s that really brought it down. So I definitely think it should be considered.
Maybe also Smash? It definitely wouldn't win, but it would feel weird for there to be no Nintendo game at all this year.
Yup! I'm not worried about that, but I'm just lowering my expectations slightly so as to not be disappointed.
Fuuuck. That first one!Messing around in Photo Mode. Images converted into JPEG for size purposes.
Wow those are beautiful. Does the game have changeable filters like Uncharted 4 does? Like black/white , cel-shaded?Messing around in Photo Mode. Images converted into JPEG for size purposes.
Wow those are beautiful. Does the game have changeable filters like Uncharted 4 does? Like black/white , cel-shaded?
Wait really? Just to clarify, I meant for general gameplay. Not just for the photo mode.
Messing around in Photo Mode. Images converted into JPEG for size purposes.
Fuck, this game looks incredibleMessing around in Photo Mode. Images converted into JPEG for size purposes.
Wait really? Just to clarify, I meant just for general gameplay. Not just for the photo mode.
How far can you zoom out the camera? I hope it's not like God of War's photo mode
Just...amazing. Love that movie suit.Messing around in Photo Mode. Images converted into JPEG for size purposes.
I'm re-watching 2 as we speak and got past that a bit ago.The dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
Holy fucking shit but these are almost definitely on the Pro so I shouldn't get too excited.
Ahh I would have loved a cel-shaded gameplay filter that is found in Uncharted 4. Any update on hud and mini-map customization? Thank you so much btw.Oh, for gameplay? No. Toggles for Chromatic Aberration, sliders for Film grain, Motion Blur, and Brightness.
Maximum zoom and FOV.
The dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
Yup! I'm not worried about that, but I'm just lowering my expectations slightly so as to not be disappointed.
The dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
Any update on hud and mini-map customization? Thank you so much btw.
I think they change in the game in general.Oh shit! Didn't know that the homecoming suit has eyes that change like the movie one. Thought they would be static.
Spider-Man |OT| - Ow the EDGEThe dream is over, its way back down to 87 and there's still EDGE...
Bummer. Thank you though.Nah. You can toggle the HUD background for contrast. No other options.
Oh, did not know that. Cool, cool, cool.You won't be disappointed. Resolution is the only difference between the base and Pro version of Spider-Man, afaik.
I own a Pro btw.