As a big Atlus fan this is so very disappointing. They could've handled it very well and mature in this version of the game, but instead they chose the route they seemingly always choose when it comes to gender and sexuality: the easy one.
So how did the original Catherine make it unscathed considering its transphobia in the first place?
Can the writers at Atlus grow the fuck up already? Persona 5 was generally okay in regards to this stuff (though definitely not perfect) but this sounds awful. Kanji should have been handled so much better in Persona 4 as well. I was so worried about Sylvando in Dragon Quest XI but the way he was handled puts Atlus to shame. They need to take some lessons from Square.
So how did the original Catherine make it unscathed considering its transphobia in the first place?
To clarify, how's that dialogue between Erica and Toby even intended to be a """joke""" or a """punchline"""? I can't wrap my head around it. Is it just "Erica didn't transition in this timeline so she's a guy now so it's ironic and funny that she implies she's a girl who's interested in Toby har har har"? If anything in a vacuum it seems like it's just reaffirming/implying Erica identifies as a woman to me (which certainly doesn't excuse anything about why she's shown without transition in the first place, but was perhaps a very, very, very bad attempt at conveying Erica still loves Toby in this timeline, as a woman).
Toby says "I'm so Jealous! I wonder if there are any other angels like her left [for me]!"
Erica responds "There might be one closer than you think!" as she puts her arm around Toby.
Atlas USA having no say in this doesn't mean that everyone working at Atlus USA aren't still super complicit in normalizing transphobia and hatred. Their job is literally to adapt a hateful work into English and market it the US. Anyone working there should absolutely be ashamed of themselves.
GTFO with this shit Atlus.
Also, I never knew Erica was trans. Didn't pick up on that and never got that ending, but always found her to be a cool character. So learning all this is dissappointing.
Same. I've loved Catherine and Persona for how unique they were, and surprisingly deep Persona can be, so it feels so wrong that they still conform to tired old anime stereotypes.Man, it's my favorite game. And I wanted this to get better because I want everyone to be able to enjoy it, and it seems like in some ways it got worse. I'm going to try to be optimistic that the more optimistic readings have merit, and really I've read enough spoilers already, but come on Japan.
Edit : I mean seriously the credits shit again? That's so easy to do right.
I disagreed with a lot of the interpretations of Ericas handling in OG Catherine. But the easiest thing to fix, the credits, was the biggest offense and I can't believe they didn't change that.
Yes but for all of that. Their games always end up reinforcing that conformity.Its so sad and ironic that Atlus is so backwards on this, given that the themes of so many of their games are about social non-conformity and subculture. Or maybe I'm missing a deeper reading of their games as more reactionary on the whole.
Atlus US have no say in the matter. AJP a very controlling and dictate how the games is translated and how they're acted.Atlas USA having no say in this doesn't mean that everyone working at Atlus USA aren't still super complicit in normalizing transphobia and hatred. Their job is literally to adapt a hateful work into English and market it the US. Anyone working there should absolutely be ashamed of themselves.
That very much comes from Wa philosophy. Which is personified with the saying. The nail that sticks up, gets hammered down.oy vey.
as a trans person this just comes off as cis developers being clueless. "wouldn't your life be so much easier if you hadn't transitioned?"
no. the fact is that many trans people's lives may not even continue if they didn't transition. the rate of suicide for people of trans experience is astronomical, especially if they remain in the closet.
Yes but thats what I'm saying. I'm not convinced by the "just following orders" defense... I dont think Atlus USA should be let off the hook at all.Atlus US have no say in the matter. AJP a very controlling and dictate how the games is translated and how they're acted.
Yes but thats what I'm saying. I'm not convinced by the "just following orders" defense... I dont think Atlus USA should be let off the hook at all.
You really are underestimating just how controlling AJP are.Yes but thats what I'm saying. I'm not convinced by the "just following orders" defense... I dont think Atlus USA should be let off the hook at all.
Weather intense criticism and not be allowed to handwave it away or pass the buck exclusively up the chain to Japan.
And what do you consider them hand waving be ? As they have zero influence on AJP whatsoever.Weather intense criticism and not be allowed to handwave it away or pass the buck exclusively up the chain to Japan.
This goes far beyond tone deaf. To just being wilfully ignorant.Yea this is pretty bad, being this tone deaf in this day and age is pathetic.
I really can't see this as tone deaf anymore. This isn't some new IP from a tiny studio, this is a remake of a game that had many years of discussion around its trans representation, and the producer explicitly stating that they wanted to acomodate how values in society changed since the first release. Then they do this.Yea this is pretty bad, being this tone deaf in this day and age is pathetic.
This goes far beyond tone deaf. To just being wilfully ignorant.
Yea I really dont know what to call this, I just know there's no excusing it. All I can really hope for is that it isnt malicious, but after them being outright confronted on Kanji being gay in an interview (which they denied on the spot) to Persona 5's treatment of gay characters does speak volumes...I really can't see this as tone deaf anymore. This isn't some new IP from a tiny studio, this is a remake of a game that had many years of discussion around its trans representation, and the producer explicitly stating that they wanted to acomodate how values in society changed since the first release. Then they do this.
Even Rin's route sounds shady. People have been saying it's actually handled well for what it is, but I can't help but wonder if that's just their answer to people's issues with Erica. "Well, if you want to fuck a feminine guy so much, here's another one for you."
And that's just a few years after Persona 5 got criticized for its portrayal of gay men. They're not just some clueless japanese old men, they know what they're doing. It really just comes down to a difference in values. It's not that they're not aware, or even that they don't care, they just actively dislike LGBT people.
I can't see any other answer, but I do really hope I'm wrong. Persona 4 is one of my favorite games of all time, and Catherine is a gem as well. And as much as I dislike Persona 5, I have to admit the portrayal of gay men didn't really impact my enjoyment that much, but this is just going too far, even for someone who usually doesn't skip games based on these things.
Don't forget how the Persona 4 anime made the Protagonist actively take part in those Yosuke jokes every time and even added in a creepy fanservice scene with the girls during Shadow Kanji's introduction since they thought viewers would be afraid of too much gay stuff on the screen, I guess.What's weird to me about the transphobic/homophobic jokes in Atlus games is that they're completely out of character, every single time
Persona 4, and its spin-offs, have massive monologues about accepting who you are and being your true self. It's literally the theme of the game. But characters constantly bring up Kanji's shadow as a joke, even though that happens with literally no other character after they're recruited (imagine if everyone was like "gonna go strip, Rise?" it'd be appalling)
The frustrating thing is they have an out for most of it too - make Yosuke closeted. It wouldn't be perfect, but that sort of deflection would actually make him somewhat realistically written - speaking from personal experience as a teen. As is the case now, though, he becomes a baffling jerk to Kanji for no reason, and no one stops him. Teddie is even worse and I think he gets way too much of a free pass for his shtick.
Same goes for Persona 5, almost everyone is great to Lala but those two gay stereotypes are to be feared/laughed at.
IIRC Lala was one of the most popular characters even in Japan so maybe that'll tip make them tweak things for Persona 5 R. But probably not.
Granted I haven't played Catherine since its original EU release but if I recall Catherine (the character) did not seem like the kind of person who wanted others to be happy, only to further her selfish goals. Her going back in time to make everyone's lives better seems so out of character for her. Translations being what they are they could easily lose certain nuances. I could very much see an ending where Catherine claims to be going back to improve everyone's lives but in actuality makes it worse, hence Erica not transitioning.
Or I could be wrong and this is another example of Japanese lack of understanding of the LGBT community.
Have they issued a statement condeming the views of this new game. They could start there.
HOLY SHIT
Always defended Erica, best girl in the game, but this is too much, I can't. Why, Atlus, why?
If they are responsible for localizing hateful content and marketing it to consumers, then they don't get to handwave all responsibility away by saying "but they made all the decisions, we're just following orders". They need to share the responsibility for the global spread of an extremely hateful product. They don't get to claim total blamelessness here.And what do you consider them hand waving be ? As they have zero influence on AJP whatsoever.
That's already better, but still really shitty to make Erica not transition for whatever reason. It's definitely not as aggressive as it first sounded like if your version is the correct one, but it's still denying her identity, it implies her transition was just a result of "circumstances", and not an expression of her true self, of who she really is and always was.That's because she didn't, she never said she was going back in time to improve everyone's lives. She goes back in time to create a timeline in which her and Vincent could meet earlier, under different circumstances.
Persona 3 had a trans woman who the cast pointed out forgot to shave, humiliating her in a public space, Persona 4 famously featured Kanji's crippling fear of his own sexuality, and Persona 5 featured a gay couple who not only stalk the protagonist and Ryuji, but eventually molest Ryuji offscreen, resulting in the protagonist mocking him after the fact.I feel it's a representation of how far Japanese society as a whole is on issues of race, gender and sexuality. At this point it just comes across as willful ignorance.
Persona 3 had a trans woman who the cast pointed out forgot to shave, humiliating her in a public space, Persona 4 famously featured Kanji's crippling fear of his own sexuality, and Persona 5 featured a gay couple who not only stalk the protagonist and Ryuji, but eventually molest Ryuji offscreen, resulting in the protagonist mocking him after the fact.
This isn't ignorance. This is malice. The series has actively made an effort to make queer people the butt of jokes, and when they're not the joke itself, it's them subjecting others to their queerness that is the "joke", such as everyone making fun of Toby for being in a sexual relationship with Erica, all because she's trans.
For everyone who is talking about willful ignorance : when is the last time P Studio/Studio Zero released a game without an homophobic or transphobic joke ?
What I don't understand is why do they always include some shit like this in their games. It would be so much easier to just avoid the subject altogether and not include any LGBT stuff.
Have they issued a statement condeming the views of this new game. They could start there.
I see what you mean.I remember all of those examples from Persona very vividly and I agree wholeheartedly. What I mean is that to me, it feels like they're not even attempting to take on the criticism they're receiving and trying to A) Understand the issues and B) Learn from their mistakes. That's why I call it willful ignorance. Of course, it absolutely comes across as malicious too. The two are not mutually exclusive.
And people expect Atlus to treat the LGBT community better in P5R re-release.
Fuck off, Atlus.
If anything you'll know they'd add more scenes featuring the two gay NPCs that you encounter twice in the game and represented in the same manner they were in the original release.And people expect Atlus to treat the LGBT community better in P5R re-release.
Fuck off, Atlus.