Luigi's Mansion 3 | Review Thread
- Thread starter Deleted member 10737
- Start date
Hmm I mean all that really says is that reviewers don't use the full 0-100 scale. Really people will read anything they want into the numbers. 86 can be anything from next GOTY material to a massive disappointment,.
...this builds into a ff7-esque sequel where Gooigi travels the world believing he is the true Luigi only to go on a dark journey to discover he is just a snotty clone, but eventually finding his own purpose through his own journey
How could you say something so controversial yet completely correct?
You really can't go wrong with any of them. Luckily they're different enough that you should be able to make a decision based on the kind of game you feel like playing the most!
I was thinking more of a Kingdom Hearts heartless sort of thing, but that's a great direction too. I will happily support any ending that gives Gooigi a starring role in the next game as an existentially disturbed weirdo
Another reason why assigning numbers to reviews is pointless.
You are not invincible while doing it, your slams can be interrupted
IGN really likes it. They praise the humor, say it's very charming. They also say it's about 15 hours but they also add that there's backtracking, hopefully not too much of that because 15 hours otherwise sounds good to me!
The amount of games in that range is far lower than the one Days Gone is.
Miyamoto was actually producer on Dark Moon, not Tanabe (I don't believe he was involved at all), so he should get some credit as well.
Having just replayed the original for the first time since it's release in 2001 in preparation for LM3, I actually do think it's a legit good game, and definitely a unique one, especially for it's time. But it also felt like a lot of untapped potential... It was a very brief and basic. I think the franchise could have become huge a long time ago if they would have simply followed up with it sooner. But yeah, Next Level did a fantastic job with 2 and I absolutely cannot wait to play 3 on Thursday.
OP
OP
por que no los
thanks :)
I will not tolerate this slander of Luigi's Mansion 1. That game is perfect.
(climbing up on the table)
IT'S PERFECT.
(climbing up on the table)
IT'S PERFECT.
OP
OP
Exactly, though on some level I can understand people like the numbers to get a quick idea of how something is being received. Content of a review and personal taste are more important to me in figuring out if I'd like something. Instead of getting rid of it, I can see something like cutting down the 0-100 model working.
He was an adviser on Dark Moon, but you're right in that he wasn't as involved with that game as I thought.
OP
OP
between 15 to 20 hours to finish the game, according to most reviewers.
OP
OP
Even if so, it's still close. You can turn your slams into any direction and just smash any approaching ghost. Not only does it do crazy amounts of damage, it's an extremely effective crowd control move that essentially has no cool down. I mean, if Nintendo/NLGs objective was to make the game easy enough to be accessible to everyone, then that's fine. But let's not pretend the slam move is anything less than overpowered. It's not too far away from being LM3's Funky Kong.
OP
OP
not much of a combo, fire emblem ended up at 89 and astral chain and link's awakening at 87
OP
OP
probably will have to wait until the sequels to botw, mario odyssey and bayonetta 2.
Hard to say, considering we know next to nothing of what's even coming out next year outside of Animal Crossing.
OP
OP
OP
OP
we'll see. i'm guessing 87 or 88 for animal crossing, and a late re-release/port/remake almost always gets a lower score than the original so i'm not sure about xenoblade repeating its 90+ score.
I knew there was something weird with the slam, and why the transition animation is just missing. I bet they originally had it go back and forth only which has a complete animation, but late in development decided it needed to be much faster to make things easier. But then they didn't bother changing the animation maybe because of time? It was just really odd to me that there was so much attention to detail that they would leave such a jarring flaw like that.
Anyway, I can deal with the animation thing, but hearing how easy/boring the slam makes fights, I hope they patch it. I just don't want it to be monotonous.
Hmmm, I guess the last game didn't get an 88 or anything?
Again it has a chance but I expect some reviewers to mark it down for graphics and lack of National Dex, I'm thinking 85-90.
I might be wrong, but is that the kind of game to benefit from early critic reviews? It's more of a lowkey game where the magic happens after a few weeks when you start getting addicted. And there will be little to no online presence with review copies.
I see Xenoblade easily repeating 90+. It's a remaster and then some from what it looks like. Its a beloved game. It's adding in a full brand new area at the minimum and should have QOL improvements. Shadow of the Collosus remake is higher than the original.
Anyways we can continue this as we approach XenoblaDE's release.