I don't 100% buy into the idea that she would've needed to seek medical help for what she's saying to have really happened. I know countless people who have been abused that have not sought medical help out of fear/embarrassment/etc.
Possibly not, but broken glass is no joke. Doesn't mean seeking medical attention for it was necessary but there would absolutely be a lot of visible evidence of it and honestly I find it hard to believe that she would've interacted with it as she described in her story and not sustain some injuries that might require medical attention.
The issue here isn't debating that people who are abused don't seek medical attention or help out of embarrassment, that's well known established and understood. And if there were actual other evidence here to back up her claims I don't think anybody would be questioning them. The cycle of abuse is one that perpetuates shame and guilt and embarrassment and I think anybody that has a passing understanding of how domestic violence works gets that and would understand that you don't have to look or act a specific way, or have documented evidence of every single instance to believe it happened.
In this case not only is her descriptions and testimony seemingly overly performative and emotionally incongruent, but there's not a lot of actual evidence or witnesses to back up her claims at this time, of which there should be quite an abundant amount given her detailed descriptors often include other people. So far, nobody has verified any of the extreme elements of her story. When you have so many different elements of context mounting like that, it would be irresponsible to assume that all of it is just coincidental and she still telling the truth. It's just not adding up.
We have someone here who photographed a bruise that was somewhat superficial and could've come from any source, including someone physically restraining her due to her own violence, and claimed it was an example of her being assaulted by her then boyfriend Johnny Depp. That would have taken place before the situation that she described today, so we have that photo but no photos of these repeated facial traumas, other body injuries and traumas or anything else that would be absolutely noticeable.
It raises questions. You should believe a victim and investigate their claims, but all this investigation has yielded so far was that the abuser was Amber Heard, the victim Johnny Depp, and more evidence supporting that she was the instigator of violence and not the victim of it. Maybe that'll change but it's really not looking like I'm not sure what she's saying is factual to the way she's portraying it.