Assuming the jurors are normal ppl like us, then a logical conclusion would be yes.
Jurors in America let cops free without consequences for murdering Black folks.Assuming the jurors are normal ppl like us, then a logical conclusion would be yes.
Amber just burst out the F-word so naturally...not paraphrasing or anything. Then she realized and rephrased the testimony.
No, she alluded to it earlier- had to do with Pirates or some kind of album he was making I believe. There was a music single or something recorded that had Tom Waits and Keith Richards he went to make.
Many people think that marriage or kids will change an abusive partner. It rarely works that way and instead just allows the abuser more control over the abused. It is tragic.Wow, we're still talking about events in 2013.
Depp and Heard married in 2015.
This wouldn't be the first time that toxic and abusive people went on to marry. But, wow, this is so intense...
They're probably laughing at the notion that she's put forward that he's constantly shitting himself in front of everyone which is part of her absurd stereotype of describing what someone who drinks and does drugs is like.She is having this dramatic speech and Depp is laughing with his lawyer. WTF even is this.
Lesbian camp counselor. You heard right. She's referring to a name Depp called her- not sure the whole context on that one.
Wow, we're still talking about events in 2013.
Depp and Heard married in 2015.
This wouldn't be the first time that toxic and abusive people went on to marry. But, wow, this is so intense...
That was my first thought. You'd think soIs this flight attendant going to be a witness because that would be insane if true
She is having this dramatic speech and Depp is laughing with his lawyer. WTF even is this.
She's gonna have testimony from her friends and who knows who else corroborating all of this, presumably some of whom will say that saw or heard things. All of it depends on who and what the jury believes. The fact that she's much more outwardly emotional than Depp clearly doesn't work for everyone but may work for some members of the jury, which is all that matters as far at winning the case.
Yeah that's what's going through my mind too. She's being allowed to very openly speak about her experiences but how she's describing things and her own actions in particular just doesn't align with the facts at all. As you say there's stone cold evidence of her real demeanour and behaviour, as well as Johnny's, but all these long-winded and very very detailed stories don't align with any of it.I think the biggest issue I'm having with this testimony is that the framing goes so against what we know.
Heard is describing these events as her being this young, hopelessly-in-love partner to this enraged violent drunk who also happened to be one of the biggest stars in the world. She doesn't go into her anger issues or violent outbursts at all. And, in most cases, I would completely understand her lawyers wanting to skirt around all that. But the big problem with that is...
We have audio.
We've heard the tapes. We know Heard was prone to angry outbursts. We know Heard instigated a lot of the fights. We know Heard was physically violent 0n many occasions, and that Johnny's response to the occasions was to leave. This isn't speculation: it's on tape.
So to not have Heard talk about this in her opening testimony feels like an odd choice. Because Depp's lawyers are definitely going to talk about (including replaying the tapes).
Such a glaring omission can make your entire testimony feel dishonest.
From what I understand, her friends will not be there in person, just video deposition. Seems some of them have been distancing themselves from her.
I think the biggest issue I'm having with this testimony, is that framing goes against what we know.
Heard is describing these events as her being this young, hopelessly-in-love partner to this enraged violent drunk who also happened to be one of the biggest stars in the world. She doesn't go into her anger issues or violent outbursts at all. And, in most cases, I would completely understand her lawyers wanting to skirt around all that. But the big problem with that is...
We have audio.
We've heard the tapes. We know Heard was prone to angry outbursts. We know Heard instigated a lot of the fights. We know Heard was physically violent 0n many occasions, and that Johnny's response to the occasions was to leave. This isn't speculation: it's on tape.
So to not have Heard talk about this in her opening testimony feels like an odd choice. Because Depp's lawyers are definitely going to talk about (including replaying the tapes).
Such a glaring omission can make your entire testimony feel dishonest.
From what I understand, her friends will not be there in person, just video deposition. Seems some of them have been distancing themselves from her.
So this story has no emotion from her but the dog story had her on the brink of tears....sure.
Dumb question, but since she invoked Johnny's children in her testimony, could they be called to testify?
That's interesting but it can work both ways, since Depp's team won't be able to give a current cross after having listened to everything up till now.
Speaking of the dog, look who posted a video on their Instagram of her holding their dog out the car of a moving vehicle.So this story has no emotion from her but the dog story had her on the brink of tears....sure.
Dumb question, but since she invoked Johnny's children in her testimony, could they be called to testify?
Speaking of the dog, look who posted a video on their Instagram of her holding their dog out the car of a moving vehicle.
Speaking of the dog, look who posted a video on their Instagram of her holding their dog out the car of a moving vehicle.