"Mr. Biden was given time for an afternoon nap each day".
I don't even know what to say.
It sounds like Biden's condition is a lot worse than the White House is letting on.
No offense, but when we are rightfully being told democracy is on the line, it really comes off contradictory when people are being told to suddenly ignore the peril and let the fait of democracy for 300 million people come down to the counsel of Biden by unelected family members and an unelected campaign staff that's ambitions and financial incentives are tied to the president's campaign and whom all just thought it was a good idea to hype up and agree to a debate with a gish gallop machine with no fact-checkers. To think about 2028 if we must.Some people are thinking a last minute switch will beat Trump, which is borderline laughable IMO. If they yank Biden, and then Gavin/Whitmer/whoever get's wrecked, not only does Trump win, but 2028 is already in jeopardy because the people who you thought were waiting in the wings to lead the party already got a L in the Win/Loss column on the national stage. And add to that the broken loyalty and fragmentation you create within the Democratic party, which must remain 100% united. Dems would be toast. I think that's an even bigger danger than if Biden stays in it.
If Biden stays in and loses, there's still hope for a "from the ashes" moment for one of the aformentioned Dems in 2028. As bad as 4 more years of Trump will be, the last thing we need to do is set up an easy handoff to another GoPer in 2028. Plus, if Biden wins, a Dem handoff in 2028 to one of the aforementioned Dem hopefuls is a lot more likely.
Knee-jerk reactions are very very bad in politics.
Stick with Biden, win or lose. If HE chooses to bounce, then so be it. Be if he's up for it, we gotta support him all the way.
Some people are thinking a last minute switch will beat Trump, which is borderline laughable IMO. If they yank Biden, and then Gavin/Whitmer/whoever get's wrecked, not only does Trump win, but 2028 is already in jeopardy because the people who you thought were waiting in the wings to lead the party already got a L in the Win/Loss column on the national stage. And add to that the broken loyalty and fragmentation you create within the Democratic party, which must remain 100% united. Dems would be toast. I think that's an even bigger danger than if Biden stays in it.
If Biden stays in and loses, there's still hope for a "from the ashes" moment for one of the aformentioned Dems in 2028. As bad as 4 more years of Trump will be, the last thing we need to do is set up an easy handoff to another GoPer in 2028. Plus, if Biden wins, a Dem handoff in 2028 to one of the aforementioned Dem hopefuls is a lot more likely.
Knee-jerk reactions are very very bad in politics.
Stick with Biden, win or lose. If HE chooses to bounce, then so be it. Be if he's up for it, we gotta support him all the way.
It sounds like Biden's condition is a lot worse than the White House is letting on.
Not that we need anymore hypotheticals but... if the Dems do make a swap at the DNC, will any of the Red States, or even the battleground states with GOP control, actually replace Biden on their ballots with this new candidate without any pushback? Something tells me there will be an attempt to block any changes by the GoP's clown car lawyer army, it'll wind up in SCOTUS, and they will side with....who?
Potential candidates would then need to secure the endorsements of 40 current D.N.C. members, including four from each of the party's four regions, from the roster of roughly 400 members.
"Given the relatively small number of D.N.C. members," he wrote, "such a process will most likely result in not more than five potential nominees."
The party would then host two televised events for the candidates to "make their cases before Democratic voters across the country."
The process would conclude at the party's August convention in Chicago, Mr. Zogby suggested, where candidates would be formally nominated and votes would be taken among the delegates.
"The excitement generated by this process and the attention it will be given will be a plus for our eventual nominee," he wrote.
There is always hope. I don't think Trump will cancel the election. There are too many blue states with too much economic power for that to ever work. He will certainly try to sue to run for a 3rd term assuming he's still alive.Call me am optimist, but even if Trump wins I feel like 2028 will still be more like the polish elections then the Russian ones. In Russia the results where set in stone, while in Poland there was a clear thumb on the scale giving one party a huge advantage, but the opposition was able to overcome it eventually and is now starting to fix things. Not saying it will not be bad of course, because it would be. But I don't believe, or at least want to believe, that there is no hope at all for America if trump wins. It will be very hard, but not impossible.
I mean, valid excuse or not, if I did that I'd probably almost fall asleep on a debate stage too as a 48 year old in decent health. But I'm not running for any officeBeing tired from having to travel the world causing him to ... almost fall asleep on stage during a debate?
I mean, valid excuse or not, if I did that I'd probably almost fall asleep on a debate stage too as a 48 year old in decent health. But I'm not running for any office
What the hell, indeed. I'd say context is crucial, but having a convicted felon just chillaxing around the White House is insanely poor optics, not the least when considering Hunter's, well, everything.
Trump is also, thankfully, oldCall me am optimist, but even if Trump wins I feel like 2028 will still be more like the polish elections then the Russian ones. In Russia the results where set in stone, while in Poland there was a clear thumb on the scale giving one party a huge advantage, but the opposition was able to overcome it eventually and is now starting to fix things. Not saying it will not be bad of course, because it would be. But I don't believe, or at least want to believe, that there is no hope at all for America if trump wins. It will be very hard, but not impossible.
This was written June 24th before the debate…Mr. Biden is entering his fifth day of preparations at the presidential retreat in the woods of northern Maryland for Thursday's debate against Donald J. Trump. Camp David has become the epicenter for an administration and campaign effort to help Mr. Biden shake off the rust that often comes with being an incumbent on the defense, and combat widespread voter concerns that he is too old to be an effective president.
Yeah, luckily the role of President should be a cakewalk without any long days or stress. ;)Being tired from having to travel the world causing him to ... almost fall asleep on stage during a debate?
The debate was 12 days after he got back. That's an awful lot of long days to have jet lag.Yeah, luckily the role of President should be a cakewalk without any long days or stress. ;)
I know. My comment is more for the gaslighters telling us it was all fine and that everything is A-OK.The debate was 12 days after he got back. That's an awful lot of long days to have jet lag.
So he had a cold, was jetlagged and is old. Have I missed any of his excuses so far?
Haha, gotcha.I know. My comment is more for the gaslighters telling us it was all fine and that everything is A-OK.
Not that we need anymore hypotheticals but... if the Dems do make a swap at the DNC, will any of the Red States, or even the battleground states with GOP control, actually replace Biden on their ballots with this new candidate without any pushback? Something tells me there will be an attempt to block any changes by the GoP's clown car lawyer army, it'll wind up in SCOTUS, and they will side with....who?
We still riding with the NYT after they made their intentions towards Biden clear? lol
What meetings? Without context it sounds like the officials are just worried about optics.
I honestly do not understand this impetus to constantly talk about the debate failure. It just seems like accepting the Republican framing of it."I didn't listen to my staff" is like one of the worst things he could say right now.
The Republican framing? It was a total clusterfuck.I honestly do not understand this impetus to constantly talk about the debate failure. It just seems like accepting the Republican framing of it.
Here is more
View: https://x.com/MSNBC/status/1808203197695041972
They don't specify what the meetings were about just that it is unusual. Not unusual that he is at the house at times just the attending of meetings with the President's and his "senior advisors."
I agree, but I'd feel like you'd want to project strength and confidence than just apologize for it over and over. But Biden strategists might have accepted that is not possible at this stage.
Here is more
View: https://x.com/MSNBC/status/1808203197695041972
They don't specify what the meetings were about just that it is unusual. Not unusual that he is at the house at times just the attending of meetings with the President and his "senior advisors."
A historically unpopular president where most polls show that the vast majority of people do not think he should run for president. His loyal 30% or so of his parties base tell everyone that they are delusional about the president's mental health and despite what you see on camera consistently is actually fake news and the media is out to get him. This president is also very right wing on the border and full throatedly supports a brutal foreign leader who is committing unspeakable acts on an innocent populace. This president also showed up with a spray tan, to show how not old he is. Biden fucked up by not releasing a hat.This has to stop.
There are legitimate criticisms of NYT and the media in general, but a lot of the posts on Era recently ate turning into "don't trust the media!" rhetoric that we have historically mocked when the other side does it.
There's no denying that the NYT might have an agenda in what they're reporting. But we also saw it with our own damn eyes and if you think that debate was some random one-time occurance, I have a bridge to sell you.
We also have NBC News reporting that Hunter Biden is now sitting in on meetings and numerous sources pointing to their being legitimate worry about Biden's current abilities.
If you don't agree with the idea that he needs to step down, I get it. It would be brand new territory and we have no idea if it would help or hurt dems in November. But we have to stop with this "everyone is just out to get Joe!" narrative.
Admitting failure is a sign a strength.I agree, but I'd feel like you'd want to project strength and confidence than just apologize for it over and over. But Biden strategists might have accepted that is not possible at this stage.
I honestly do not understand this impetus to constantly talk about the debate failure. It just seems like accepting the Republican framing of it.
Even the reporting acknowledges that this isn't unusual. Sources are stipulating that it's the regularity of Hunter's attendance since they got back from Camp David is what's unusual.
But they got back from Camp David...on Sunday. It's Tuesday.
Someone posted this in the thread below the tweet; I'm assuming this is a legit timeline that was posted?
The France trip was June 5th through June 9th.
The Italy trip was June 12th through June 14th.
He was settled in at Camp David the week before the debate.
The debate was on June 27th, almost two weeks after his return from the second trip.